Avatar
mark tyler
9baed03137d214b3e833059a93eb71cf4e5c6b3225ff7cd1057595f606088434
Bitcoin & šŸ«‚ Oh and dimly trying to think through interesting issues. I think that I don’t have a right to force you to do anything other than not harm me or others. Seems like most people I interact with in the real world disagree with this statement. To be fair.. the devil is in definition of ā€œharmā€.

#decentralization

nostr:npub1hte85nxymfyez0nlmmxf287nh9cujfuetxhk9vptwcdqg0pn8pxqxasw3d

I saw a guy driving around today and had to snap a shot.

I didn’t see the passenger for as long but i kid you not it looked like jb55

Isn’t what you’re saying, here more geared, toward who do we penalize for a specific death? I guess what I’m thinking is that on an individual basis the morality of whether or not to drive doesn’t require knowing exactly who it is who dies as long as you know gwhat their death is like so that you can assess the morality of driving.

I’ve watched a few videos of Australian farm life and yeah. It’s wild out there.

Replying to Avatar StackSats.IO

So #AUStriches Federal Government is introducing new vehicle emissions standards which would ban the sale of new Toyota Hilux and Ford Rangers amongst others in 2025.

This is all being supported by Covid-style modelling from University of Melbourne’s Climate Futures Academy - check this link to their site to see the kind of postmodern neo-Marxist garbage this government-funded institution is pushing: https://www.unimelb.edu.au/climate/news-and-events

The ā€œestimatedā€ premature deaths are fucking nonsense and yet politicians and academics are going around parroting the findings as though they’re gospel. No-one in the media is challenging it either.

In the real world this is going to force people into buying EVs which are completely unfit for purpose, driving up prices on cars and home batteries, and literally leaving people stranded in this giant country.

The parasites literally have no clue how the real world works but they’ll make #AUStriches find this out the hard way..

Link didn’t work for me, but just curious what level of verifiable negative impact on other people’s lives driving a car could produce before one should stop driving, and what the gap between current claims and ā€œverifiableā€ claims are.

One thing that makes the think it’s satire is the whole epistemology around how he goes from seeing (really anything to making conclusions, but specifically) airships anchored to buildings to deciding that they are charging, and not only are they charging, but charging without paying any money for electricity. In the script he makes it sound like of course they are charging, but I think that’s just playing on how when normal folks plug stuff in it’s usually to charge. Also, check out the watt-hour per kg density of batteries of the day. It was not suitable for lighter than air travel. Still isn’t even though it’s improved immensely.

Taking a step back, why does he not just believe it’s just anchoring given how easily wind can blow airships around? Wind is still the number one problem preventing airship adoption. Otherwise they are fantastic modes of travel. Still not free of course.

šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚

That’s some excellent satire.. at least it 80% sure it is, 20% think it might be serious lol.

Replying to Avatar mattaroo

50% chance of payout every 7 days with current hash rate I think, so not too surprising right?