I havenāt tried, but I wonder much of the process ChatGPT 4 would be able to help with as far as being the tech savvy friend.
Way to go btw. Iām looking forward to doing the same at some point
Endurance #bookstr
nostr:note1l4dpp5cw5ux7vzywac4yy5r72u4apws3w2d04k2h0y7vlgaa4vmsruznhm
Everyone is different, why wouldnāt you? Does that include not doing zap splits?
Estimate being 1/100 with surgery to ānormalizeā appearance estimated at 1/1000
Chart please š
I totally get that. Yeah, for one not having access to the very best models will produce that frustration. Also experience leads to better prompts (to avoid past frustrations).
For now, there are some specific limitations, like being able to think about a specific large code base all at once. But there are paths to overcoming that, some of which are live if difficult to use at the moment, like vector embedding databases that really start to overcome that. Another path would be automating the creation of these councils/swarms of AI agents allowing you to spin your an entire corporation of LLM individuals in seconds.
But yeah basically every day I write at least one prompt which gets me exactly the kind of āpreviously had to be in the hands of humansā result. I donāt know if we really need another 100x in capability or just more mature infrastructure to use what we have. Blows my mind. And also convinces me that humans are on our way out of the economy unless we stop playing with this new kind of fire. š¬
Precisely. The ordinal can be on a single sat I think
Totally agree on the thought that lots of people will never question what it says.. even though itās right in front of their face that by changing their prompt up they can get it to answer in contradicting ways.
People too are not faultless though right?
One thing you said caught my attention, maybe Iām making something of nothing but when you say āsourcing scriptsā it makes me want to emphasize that I have it write on a nearly daily basis scripts that Iām quite sure donāt exist anywhere on the internet.
It *understands* in some non-conscious war, because understanding is a better way to score well during training than memorizing.
Iām a heavy LLM user, my perception is that the state of the art models as of today make mistakes less frequently than nearly all the humans I interact with both professionally and socially. But even better is the fact that itās always available and responds instantly. That takes communication cycles which previously would have been between me and a human down by 10-1000x, for pennies. So much better.
On the mistakes topic, not sure if youāve tried this before, but ask it to put on a new persona and critique what the other LLM persona said and it can form a council of unique individuals critiquing the ideas and working to find the best answer with whatever method you like.
I tried the same thing with molten steel and I have to say, Iām confused.
English still rules the world, but thatās not necessarily OK. Is it time to curb its power? | Michele Gazzola | The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/dec/27/english-world-power-language-linguistic-justice
Wow, an English tax is provocativeā¦ should there similarly be a tax on bitcoiners to help to support poor BCH users to support fairness between monetary networks? Or an email tax to support people not using electronic mail yet?