Honest question though. What difference does it make? Isnât the wine âfinishedâ when you package it?
Iâm sorry, I apologise unreservedly
Since you made the initial claim why donât we start with you showing us an example of a species of tree that has a trunk with vertices.
But 1/2 of your argument is that only biology can make geometric shapes. That has been shown to be a false claim which casts doubt on your entire argument and therefore the burden of proof is on you to prove that these formations cannot be formed by geological processes.
Lava does not harden into hexagonal shapes.
Only biology does that.
Take all the time you need... https://video.nostr.build/c29b61f4f7a4861a6d877c4b8b86b11b970a920f7a590dbce4114f486e195b2a.mp4
So many follow up questions. If they were so big how did they become petrified stood up?
The problem with everything being a conspiracy theory is that you canât see the wood for the trees. Well played CIA, well played.
Not getting irradiated because of the lack of atmosphere and dying of cancer.
Interstellar jizz missiles - love it đ
If I push a candle in a direction and itâs not in a closed container the flame will not move in the direction of the force. Anyone who has ever carried anything with a flame on it will tell you that is true.
This phenomenon is caused by the flame being in the sealed container. From the candles point of view the earth is accelerating towards it. From the earths point of view the candle (+the jar and air inside) is accelerating towards it. The physics that explain both are the same. Therefore we have to look at other factors to decide which is actually happening. Is the earth moving up to meet the container or is the container moving down to meet the earth. Since we know from many observations that the earth is a sphere, unless it is expanding it cannot be moving âupâ in every direction at the same time. If the earth was expanding it would be observable and measurable, and this has neither been observed or measured therefore itâs reasonable to conclude that it is no the earth moving to meet the container but the container moving to meet the earth.
My reply to this would be what does the flame do if itâs not in a sealed jar? Not what we are seeing here.
So are you saying that when something âfallsâ towards the earth it does not accelerate?
I did an experiment at school when I was 13 using wooden cars, ticker tape and weights to demonstrate that acceleration due to gravity is not affected by mass but they all did still accelerate.
Iâm not trying to be a troll but you are going to have to explain in much simpler terms what it is that I donât understand here.
I understand orientation.
Iâm asking you to explain to me how the world can be moving âupâ for everyone at the same time unless itâs flat.
As an extreme example, how can it be moving âupâ for someone on the North Pole and someone on the South Pole at the same time.
Just to avoid confusion I do not think the earth is flat, itâs demonstrably a sphere and I canât tally that with your assertion that when you drop something it doesnât fall down but the earth moves âupâ to meet it.
You have lost me.
If itâs not flat how can we all be moving âupâ at the same time.
I downloaded an accelerometer, when I drop my phone it shows that itâs accelerating.
The flat earthers who went to the South Pole and observed the 24hrs sun.
Anyone whoâs ever been into space.
Eratosthenes
If itâs moving upward for me how can it be moving upward for some on the other side of the globe?
I agree with you.
I never intended to take the position that tariffs are a good thing.
Iâm 100% behind the notion that government should be small and have limited power.
I still stand behind my initial assertion though that economists are only making their best guess on whatâs going to happen because itâs not a science.