Avatar
Creature
9e5a3a1a019db4e13338cd0939acaee05eca128f3dc1c2e864b34095ed414e8d

"Wife said these are great fun. Gonna try sime our for myself"

GM, #nostriches

Linux is making me wanna punch faces again. 😡

Replying to Avatar Chris Trottier

One thing I hate about the Web? You need to know three separate programming languages, each with wildly different syntax, just to build something relatively simple: a webpage.

"But Chris, you don't need to know CSS or JavaScript! HTML will do just fine!"

Okay, how many times do you visit a website that only uses HTML? Almost never! It's almost always -- always! -- made in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.

And about that JavaScript, I guarantee a good portion of it is made with a framework like React or Node.js. Why? Because JavaScript is such a pain, it now requires pre-written code just to build a structured foundation of that website.

I can already hear you piping up, "But Chris, the modern web is built on highly complex apps, not the static webpages made in the early 90s! Its complexity is a feature, not a bug. We've evolved better scalability and interactivity as a result"

All right, you know what else can output simple *text* to a file -- but also give you coloured backgrounds, and build you apps? BASIC. Here you go:

```

10 CLS

20 COLOR 15, 1

30 PRINT "Hello world!"

40 END

```

You see that? I just accomplished all that in four lines of BASIC code.

And you know what else is interactive? BASIC again:

```

10 SCREEN 12

20 CLS

30 PRINT "Do you want to see a bouncing ball? (Y/N)"

40 INPUT A$

50 IF UCASE$(A$) <> "Y" THEN END

60

70 X = 160: Y = 100

80 DX = 0: DY = 5

90

100 DO

110 CLS

120 CIRCLE (X, Y), 10, 14

130 Y = Y + DY

140 IF Y > 180 OR Y < 20 THEN DY = -DY

150 SLEEP 1

160 LOOP UNTIL INKEY$ <> ""

170 END

```

Wow! Just now I made a simple interactive program -- with graphical elements too -- with 17 lines of BASIC code.

Yet think about all the many, *many* lines of code that modern web devs use to make something as simple as that -- because I guarantee that a good many people would just use React to make something as simple as "Hello world!" or a basic interactive bouncing ball, and then use 100MB of RAM in the process.

Is JavaScript more scalable than BASIC? Well, I question how scalable something is when it requires *more* lines of code, even with a framework, and guzzles system resources like its Barney Gumble sitting by a barrel of beer.

Am I suggesting that the entire Web be built on some flavour of BASIC? No, not at all. BASIC is built for a local machine, whereas HTML, CSS, and JavaScript are made with a distributed environment in mind -- sending data to a variety of devices with differing screen sizes and resolutions, all with differing accessibility requirements. And even then, you have to consider security.

Believe me, I get it.

Nevertheless, what's simply ridiculous about the modern Web is that it requires so much overhead for what should be a simple thing, and the inefficiency is staggering. Why do we need to overengineer a basic project?

Why do we have this culture of excessive abstraction, bloated dependencies, and unnecessary complexity for something so *simple*?

And it should be a simple thing to build a basic functioning website. You should be able to learn it in one afternoon. You should also be able to accomplish this with one language, not three.

Now I have a lot of hope for WebAssembly. I also think HTMX is pretty darn cool. But what also needs to change is the *culture* of Web development: *everyone* and *anyone* should be able to build a webpage.

Abstraction gives you re-usability. Separation of concerns is a good thing. With modern computers getting more and more RAM, processing power, etc, overhead is becoming less and less of an option.

Hmmm. Maybe they're not translated but just ppl or bots writing bad english or random stuff. Idk.

Look at the very bottm, under the post. It's in very small font and the color tends to blend in with the background a bit. (I'm on dark theme and the background is black and that stuff is in small dark gray font)

Do you want it to not translate certain languages that you know how to read or completely off? Because you can tell it to not translate certain languages.

Notice how "Auto" word in "Auto translated" is a link? Tap it and it'll show you options.

I think random characters is an encrypted string that the app client you're using hasn't been made to properly handle (I doubt it's the signature, but could be).

Random stuff is probably (poorly) auto-translated text. I know Amethyst auto-translates. We for real need to start using AI LLMs for translation. They understand context, regular translator applications do not.

Replying to Avatar The Bird

nostr:nprofile1qqstxwlea9ah3u6kjjszu6a7lrnhqkfh8eptp2z6v0e9558tlkkl2rgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9mhwden5te0wfjkccte9ec8y6tdv9kzumn9wshszxnhwden5te0wfjkccte9ekkjmnfvf5hguewvdshx6p07xr4s5 ? For you. Wallet is freezing up when trying going to scan and when selecting send option. This started this most recent update. I'm going to uninstall and recover to see if it helps. Any other ideas?

Just tried it and it works ok for me. (Android 15)

Replying to nobody

I don’t mind paying a bit of a premium for my US dollar priced nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm hub hosting because I am doing it as a means to support lightning development and propagation of the network. But I’m not going to lie, with the US/CAD exchange rate being what it is, paying nearly $20 CAD for monthly hosting to mainly just make zapping seamless on Nostr and V4V podcasting and media apps is feeling a little steep compared to say, a monthly bank service charge. Between an online game service subscription, a VPN subscription, streaming service subscriptions, natural reader (awesome) and an online AI service subscription, it adds up.

A lot of this stuff could be cancelled tomorrow because I’m mostly using a few of them for testing and experimentation purposes so that I know how to use the tech. But I can definitely see a divide being created between the level of technology access that various socioeconomic groups can expect to have in the future.

Not complaining, just making an observation.

What is "natural reader"? Is it like an e-reader subscription?