a4
iliketurtles
a4531aff74892a872b4757fe8a84dfa5813b18ee5e37ca721d828eadcc93bc5f

I paid full price for a collectible Blu Ray movie only to discover my PS5 has the wrong region code. Tried for 3 hours to get it to work and gave up.

The ā€œAIā€ race is mostly just about securing compute for the US. It’s a chip war. Generative AI is a parlor trick to get the most hash rate possible on US soil. That compute is then used to mine bitcoin or secure another proof of work digital currency. Elon is smart enough to know you need digital gold baked by compute, not digital fools gold backed by IOUs and empty promises.

You don’t mint globally. You have reputable mints with understood purities of metals in the coins. The most successful mints are state mints (US coins, Canadian coins, British Coins) because the reputation of the people and their ability to trade is tied to the purity of their coins. Private mints don’t get the same traction but can still compete largely for reserve status rather than daily trade.

This works best when you have high trust societies with enforced borders. (This has been a challenge over the past twenty years globally. Some may say this is being done by design.) Within those borders, counterfeiting is punished.

You’re asking questions like ā€œhow will this workā€ when commerce is and was conducted in this fashion for long periods of time.

Key management for crypto is ridiculous. The attack surface is global. Theft can’t even be prosecuted due to the coin mixers everyone here praises. The result is everyone is just a ā€œzapperā€ with off chain ā€œtrust me broā€ transactions facilitated by Strike.

Primal and NOSTR will be remembered, in hindsight, as marketing arms for privatized central digital currencies claiming to be facilitated with Bitcoin. We are joyously enslaving ourselves to a global tyranny.

Precious metals already scaled globally as coins. They also scaled as gold certificates aka US dollars. This was prior to being taken off the gold standard. It was so powerful it became the petro dollar and used globally for trade.

Crypto wallets are easily blacklisted from exchanges. Just wait until they are blacklisted by brick and mortar merchants who want to remain ā€œlegal.ā€ Everyone is obsessed with building the prison and linking the chains used to enslave future generations in a techno feudal future.

Replying to Avatar Anthony Accioly

GA Nostr.

https://youtu.be/jE_CNezjV7o

Why not basically give root permission and all of your data to 5 or 6 companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, X, DeepSeek, Google, etc. (along with their thousands of partners, and the authorities they’re bound to) just so you can receive semi-useful functionality that works 30% of the time?

And why not contaminate the Nostr ecosystem with code written by these same agents, while putting your trust in the hands of folks who haven’t given you any proof that they can understand and review the very code they’re deploying? Let’s rawdog our nsec or hit that ā€œI fully trust this applicationā€ button in your remote signer right away.

Good deal, no?

#GM #Nostr #AI #AiAgents #Security #Privacy

Deploying code you didn’t write and don’t understand is negligence.

Thank you ā˜ŗļø

The victims of stolen funds are the people who had their funds stolen. That is who the victim is. Coin mixers don’t ā€œallow people to transact,ā€ they hide stolen funds. That is what it is used for.

If you create code to meltdown a nuclear reactor or kill people in cars, you’re responsible to the victims. If you create money laundering software, you’re responsible to the victims.

If you think you’re getting off on a technicality, wait for the pitchforks. You’re a human in meatspace and not immune to consequences doled out by enraged victims and their families. If you don’t want the state to do it in a civil fashion on their behalf, just wait and see.

Swear to god you guys are complete morons.

Not at all. You’re not answering the question because you know your argument doesn’t hold water.

I’m talking about the person who wrote the code to meltdown the reactor. Not the person who executed the code. Is that speech yes or no.

Oh yeah my bad you’re right. Coin mixing is legitimate and is not used primarily by criminals. Phew!

Replying to Avatar Ava

Welcome back! You're right that more people are starting to realize there are real challenges here.

As for the specific retention issues...

Onboarding. The fact that self-hosting requires some technical know-how and equipment, and the alternative is to pay to play.

It's easy to pay more than a verified check cost on X when you factor in media hosting and spam-resistant relays.

Network effects. People are already established elsewhere and their friends aren't on Nostr. You're posting into a void initially.

Bitcoin echo chamber. Most people talk about Bitcoin ad nauseam. It really is the main topic of the entire protocol. If you're not interested in Bitcoin maximalism, there's still very little content diversity to keep you engaged.

Reach. People want to be heard. The daily active users hover around 10,000-15,000 "trusted" pub keys. Compare that to any mainstream platform and you're talking about a fraction of a percent of potential audience.

If you're trying to build a brand, promote a business, or just want your voice to matter in broader conversations, Nostr simply doesn't have the numbers.

But here's the thing that really gets me—according to nostr.band data, retention of trusted users trends to 0 within 30 days for recent cohorts. Think about that. We're not just failing to onboard people properly; we're losing the ones who actually make it through the initial hurdles.

The message-to-market mismatch is glaring. The marketing focuses on censorship resistance, but most users aren't posting anything that would get them banned elsewhere. The value proposition doesn't match the user experience for the average person.

And then there's the technical complexity that nobody wants to talk about. Even basic features like follow lists don't scale properly, and the relay model creates consistency issues that confuse new users.

I could go on, but these are the main structural hurdles I see that need addressing before Nostr can move beyond its current niche.

To be honest NOSTR is where bad people go to pretend to be good people. You’ve got people defending drug trafficking and theft because technically there is a use case for Silk Road and coin mixing outside of that.