Avatar
Tony Carrera
a6dcb481ecebfe58c06c8e48c8c1efe89571c559a06e4df5ca98bdb1109b145f
I sell lights @ apogeehouse.com, an architectural lighting, fans, & controls distributor. Fan of financial markets, tech & BBQ. Always learning. Using nostr to share what I have learned. Nothing I say is financial or medical advice. Assume everything I say is wrong. Do your own research.

Seeing Twitter turn into X is a little like seeing your kid hanging out with the wrong crowd and slowly slip out of control. You only hope it all works out in the end. Glad Nostr is here!

I'm not interested in politics but I do think what Mr. Kennedy is saying in this clip is important.

"The first amendment was not written for easy speech, it was written for the speech that nobody likes you for."

https://youtu.be/g1npE-oRMQo

I think when people hear the word "inflation", they either tune out or don't understand how evil it is. Evil because it's a hidden tax. Hidden because it's easier to inflate than raise taxes which is politically harmful. Your money is worth less over time because of inflation.

FOMC inflation target is 2% per year, which actually upset Paul Volcker many years back because it cuts the purchasing power of a generation in half. Example: $100K in cash, in about 35 years is worth $50K. If inflation rises to 10%, $100K is worth $50K in only 7 years.

People with no hard assets/quality stocks/passive cash flow, will be working for most of their lives. How do you beat inflation? Increase your earnings (be the best at what you do) and own quality cash flowing businesses. Consider saving in bitcoin and (some) gold. #BTC

Cherry on top. Here's what Warren Buffett had to say in his 2022 meeting: "Inflation swindles the bond investor... swindles the person who keeps their cash under their mattress, it swindles almost everybody". And an older video with Buffett on inflation:

https://youtu.be/nHEgg-VGWhk

I was raised to have low or no debt. Historically that made sense. The last decade taught us debt gets you to the next level, with low interest rates and easy money. What will the next decade bring? I still think sound money principles win in the long run.

Appreciate the things you have. Get the things you need. Worry less about what you want. Forget the rest.

Replying to Avatar nym

Multi-signature Bitcoin wallets are not inherently more resistant to quantum computers compared to single-signature wallets. The resistance to quantum computers depends on the underlying cryptographic algorithms used in the wallet.

The security of Bitcoin wallets relies on cryptographic primitives, such as digital signatures, which are vulnerable to attacks from quantum computers.

"No, ECDSA and EC-Schnorr, as well as related schemes like EdDSA, all belong to the class of elliptic curve cryptography. Their security is based on the assumption that the EC discrete logarithm is unfeasibly hard to compute. This assumption is not true if a sufficiently strong general-purpose quantum computer would exist." [1]

Quantum-resistant signature algorithms do exist, but they often come with larger signature sizes, which may make them impractical for use in Bitcoin.

"Quantum resistant signature algorithms do exist, but they all rely on very large signatures - which may make them unfeasibly expensive for purposes like Bitcoin." [1]

The migration to quantum-resistant cryptography will be a slow process, and it requires users to proactively upgrade their wallets.

"The process of migrating wallets and certificates to quantum-resistant crypto will be a painfully slow one, as any new standard adoption in security." [0]

The public key associated with a Bitcoin wallet is not actually exposed in modern Bitcoin addresses, only the hash of it. This limits the capabilities of an attacker using quantum computers.

"The real reason why (most) of Bitcoin transactions are not (much) threatened by quantum computers is that in modern Bitcoin addresses the public key connected to the wallet is not actually exposed (so, not really public), only the hash of it, which limits a lot the capabilities of an attacker." [0]

There are ongoing efforts to develop quantum-resistant blockchains and related applications, but it is not a straightforward process.

"There is ongoing work to design quantum-resistant blockchains and related applications, it's certainly feasible, but it's not as straightforward as the guy puts it." [0]

How close is a quantum attack? Seems to me the most vulnerable part of bitcoin is an actor with quantum power able to drain small accounts. No one would notice and it would be in the attackers best interest. Lost accounts would be blamed for poorly storing their seed or installing bad software.

Michael Saylor’s ‘orange check’ suggestion a while back might be the better solution?

The bubble bursting here is going to keep the funeral homes in DC busy.

Would it start with merchants starting to accept BTC? Seems like one of the few legit ways this comes to happen.

You did a good job. I watched his WBD interview a few times and I feel like he’s 70 percent there in getting his idea across. Not sure if nostr:npub14mcddvsjsflnhgw7vxykz0ndfqj0rq04v7cjq5nnc95ftld0pv3shcfrlx could have let him finish explaining his thoughts, or if it was just an incomplete thesis. His perspective is interesting nonetheless.