nostr:note1kt2yrl5e954l3xgwlmzzst5jf9qq7y8aknhx5fve2c9dhu3tf88svf6uky

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Proof of Work doesn't solve spam because spammers have more PoW than regular users. In Bitcoin it is effective because its 1 against the cumulative PoW of all others. Also, its effective against redoing history, not spam - see ordinals.

There is no cumulative PoW in nostr, so easy win for the spammers.

This is not an "us versus spammers" POW, it's suggesting that clients must provide a POW in order to submit a post, as nostr:npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp laid out here:

https://blog.lopp.net/protect-contact-forms-from-spam-with-proof-of-work/

see how cock.li impemented proof of work for anti-spam on mail registrations, it is amazing

lopps solution works because spammers dont care about his blog specifically. When Google replaces their (re)captchas with PoW it will fail within a week.

Michael Saylor’s ‘orange check’ suggestion a while back might be the better solution?