nostr:note1kt2yrl5e954l3xgwlmzzst5jf9qq7y8aknhx5fve2c9dhu3tf88svf6uky
Discussion
Proof of Work doesn't solve spam because spammers have more PoW than regular users. In Bitcoin it is effective because its 1 against the cumulative PoW of all others. Also, its effective against redoing history, not spam - see ordinals.
There is no cumulative PoW in nostr, so easy win for the spammers.
This is not an "us versus spammers" POW, it's suggesting that clients must provide a POW in order to submit a post, as nostr:npub17u5dneh8qjp43ecfxr6u5e9sjamsmxyuekrg2nlxrrk6nj9rsyrqywt4tp laid out here:
https://blog.lopp.net/protect-contact-forms-from-spam-with-proof-of-work/
Michael Saylor’s ‘orange check’ suggestion a while back might be the better solution?