Hi, my name is Raishma.

I’m a lethal gas poisoning survivor who just fully healed her lungs in Costa Rica, where I made many fascinating friends on Nostr.

I’m a white hat & this was mostly a venting/AI/burner account/social/art experiment. I went to #nostrica to see what this was all about. I’ve helped startup several tech companies.

I’m also an intense Astrophysicist.

I want to use social media to talk about Music.

I wish I could share more about my thoughts on physics but generic talk kills me & ppl are stealing my dissertation ideas like sprouting mushrooms 🍄

Anyway, ilu 🫂✨

Patiently waiting on next zenstr drop 🤙

#proofofwalk

✌🏼

thank you, the name may not be nostr or bitcoin related for that coolness factor, but it’s going to be one hell of a time.

hosted by me

on #[1]​

coming soon nostr:note1c6my8daj0teq6dgj0eep602up4gck7kfa43lhj4qsr4axfchu36qwkgx72

The Peatles 🫛

My Morning Packet

GM Seth☕️🤙🏻

Id suggest intent is actually the definition of art.

For example- If a human uses a tool to create an image, and it’s intension is to be art, then it would be art. If the same human uses that same tool with an intention to advertise a product, it is not art, but an an advertisement. In my field of photography, I define the latter as “work”.

This is also similar in other arts that become work, for example- another art I participate in is fire dancing. My partner now has a side gig where she performs this art for pay. While it is an art, when performed for pay it becomes work, and the “artistic expression” one has is limited by clients’ desires.

Therefore, I’d make two claims- A- AI cannot create art, only a human using an AI as a tool can do so, by using such a tool with the intention to create art. B- art has no relation to a viewer’s experience, emotional or otherwise, positive or negative, but rather the creators intent.