My receiver might be busted again. Anyone mind doing a small zap for me? 🙏 will zap back with interest
GIVE ME SOMETHING TO ZAP
Oh? Say more…
?cid=2154d3d72foq8ckqst4cuf9snjobxw5fxego2qpcc79xkqgc&ep=v1_gifs_search&rid=giphy.gif&ct=g
Oh fuck. That zap zap zap script for the Damus TestFlight is incredible.
This or similar: https://a.co/d/0bWYHY7
If you do take a lot of video calls and share a workspace with other people or any noisy objects I highly recommend https://krisp.ai/ — it’s an AI plugin that completely cancels out all noise except the sound of your voice. I work five feet away from my wife and my coworkers hear nothing. It’s like $110 for a year long subscription which I think is well worth it. #wfh #ai
Liberal statist here 🙋♂️
I am in favor of replacing many key functions of the banking sector with bitcoin for the reasons you mentioned.
While that’s a reductive analogy, I’ll give it to you on the premise that you reject the authority of an elected government the same way that you reject the authority of a hostile crime syndicate. It’s a bit different to me but sure, not far off of you really boil it down.
So I have nothing else to add here because this gets at a fundamental disagreement between us that we simply can’t get past. I think guns in too many hands is bad, government is not inherently extortive, taxes are not inherently coercive, and I don’t think violent revolution is the answer to anything because when does that ever work out well for the people?
But I will say that were this exchange to have happened on Twitter, one or the other of us would have resorted to name calling or Hitler references before the third volley.
I admit I’m a fish out of water on Nostr in terms of my political views but this is a good place 🫂 💜
Ok two things here. First, theft is theft. Someone steals my shit and I get nothing for it. Taxation funds a lot of stuff, but also the provision of public services—to you and also to other people. We can argue until the cows come home about whether that’s right or wrong, or whether you get enough in return for your tax dollars, but show me a person who is aggro about their taxes and I’ll show you someone else who benefits from a government program. The fact is it’s a value exchange. This is a core belief of mine, however lop sided the value exchange might be today.
Second: sure, if there was some massive public version of kickstarter that could direct my funds to the things that matter most to me, hot damn, sign me up. But—keeping the examples to public works, since that’s my jam—to my knowledge there is no way for me to contribute to redevelopment of the northeast corridor, or expansion of New York City sewer capacity, or public schools or the construction of a nuclear plant. So for now my best bet is to pay my taxes and vote for the people that care about the things that I do while I stack sats.
Fair, but then ask the finance people on those projects whether they would ever be financially viable without subsidy, eminent domain, etc and lmk what you learn too.
To be pedantic, roads are comparatively easy. High speed rail, not easy at all. Like literally impossible without government intervention even in the best cases. But it’s hard to argue that *in certain cases* (such as Japanese Shinkansen for example) society was worse off for it. Government funded public works can be the engines of society.
I like you.
Disagree. That doesn’t work because people are inherently selfish. Put too many of them in a room with competing interests and nothing will get done. A decade in corporate leadership roles has taught me this. That’s the entire premise behind representative government.
Ok yes you’re right, I hate freedom and human rights. Long live slavery!! Silly argument.
Look, I fundamentally disagree with “taxation is theft.” In fact I think high earners should be taxed even more than they are. I make a half a million a year in the fiat mines so I’m including myself in that set. Tax me!
But I also think that our political system is failing us. If the choice is between trump and biden then fuck me.
That’s actually not what Lenin said at all. The quote was, “The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency,” and that quote was falsely attributed to Lenin by none other than John Maynard Keynes. Taken at face value—if Lenin had indeed originated it—that could even be seen as an argument *against* inflationary monetary policy, in alignment with the views of many bitcoiners.
Also, I’m not saying that a socialist state would not capture the mint of given the opportunity. Any government would do so. The point is that if it are impossible for a socialist state to control the money supply, it would not necessarily render the state powerless.
To be clear here I majored in economics 15 years ago, with a focus on public property rights and international trade. And the only universal truth in economics is that there is no universal truth in economics. Sure, it’s easy to say that production cures all ails but the secret sauce is in how to incentivize production of the right stuff in the right places. A major role of government in an ideal sense is to cut through local comparative advantages and the misalignment of incentives that inevitably arises in a diffuse structure of governance. I fundamentally believe that there is a role for government, maybe even “big government,” however different it may look from what we see today.
Thanks for the recommendations, will listen. Should have known you were OP’s sibling 😂. So who’s the smartest one?
Sir, I think we question each others’ understanding of bitcoin here. If you think that bitcoin and guns solve the issues in our society then I can’t get on board with what you’re preaching.
Non-socialist with a economics degree here. Fiat money is not a socialist concept. It’s a facet of all manner of modern economies. The central pillar of socialism is collective ownership of the means of production, which in practice results in the direct intervention by the government in all aspects of the economy. Control over monetary policy and issuance is not a hard requirement for a socialist state to function; the state would simply adapt to their lack of control over money supply by exerting control in other areas.
