If developer flags txns that come to his pool, and the role of the coordinator is to have the biggest pool possible, then even if coordinator is foss there is still a control of utxos that come into it. Why do they flag income tx that they think at bad or whatever? Yes I can run your own coordinator but that defeats the purpose of being in the biggest pool possible. Are you suggesting that I run my own coordinator and mix with myself? That is why sparrow wallet is using whirlpool and it’s pools and not their own. Because one want to hide and stay hidden in the biggest pool available. So ANYONE by themselves defeats the purpose of staying hidden.

Zeus is just a remote controller to your node, most likely you have a problem with your node and not Zeus. I never have problems with Zeus.

https://opreturnbot.com

https://github.com/benthecarman/OP-RETURN-Bot

Star9 is NOT FOSS nor UMBRELL again you do not do your own research. Wasabi foss but coordinator is not because it blocks certain txns again if yuubise wasabi yuu are a customer.

If your Bitcoin node package software isn't FOSS, you're only a customer. You're not sovereign.

https://sovrnbitcoiner.com/why-bitcoin-can-only-be-as-free-open-source-software/

They won’t go to war with Russia they only go to war with countries that are weak and don’t have air/water/land superiority. Did Iraq, Syria, Libya, Yemen, Yugoslavia, Vietnam had air power or rocket power of course not. They can only talk but cannot walk.

The reason calyx is used or recommended because of the fis about grapheneOS developer. But most people are sheep and don’t do their own research just like with wasabi scum.

How can it be Freedom money when everyone kyc themselves and take selfies for government sats? Be specific kyc free bitcoin is freedom money!

So If I am accepting sats for goods and services and I know that there is on 21mil bitcoin therefore I don't need to even bother converting to legacy system. it's irrelevant. I set my price for goods and service that I provide or get based on that fact. so why fiat denomination matter. It does not.

First of all it needs to be kyc free.

where are wasabi scumbags go?

Tell me what is your opinion about this fundamental formula of mixing.

It defines the difference between strong mixing and weak mixing. If you don't understand this difference, you can't understand the design choices made for Whirlpool. And you can't understand why the design choices made for Wasabi will always lead to a weaker form of mixing.

First of all SW coordinator is blinded run over tor so even if Samourai can track xpubs they don’t know entities ip and even if they do they have no idea about what happens post mix txns.

For equal outputs to exist there will be change and coordinator is blinded (soon decentralized) It doesn't know the links between a coinjoin's inputs and outputs. That was one of the major goals of the zerolink framework. Also doxxic change is completely unaffected by mixes since it has never been mixed.

Every SW user knows exactly what to do with that doxxic change so there is no combining with other doxxic change that didn’t come from the same source.

The Tx0 makes all your UTXO's share a tx hash, which prevents them from mixing with each other, preventing an "accidental" Sybil attack from entering a large amount of BTC, Samourai separates the coordinator fee in the Tx0 no fee flagging in the fee addresses. Every communication between Alice and the coordinator is made with a different Tor identity. It's transparent for the coordinator if one of the messages is actually sent by Bob, so when Alice sends her clear output to the coordinator it's made with a Tor identity different from the Tor identity used to submit the input and the blinded ouput. Who is using this Tor identity is transparent for the coordinator. It’s two separate Tor identities. This was even in the original zerolink docs IIRC.

So once coins are mixed, they are segregated and can't "accidentally" make their way back to unmixed section of wallet. You have to manually generate a receive address and send from postmix to get utxos back there, which obviously you shouldn't do. This is the only way to have true ZeroLink, where a user can't spend mixed and unmixed together. SW doing ZeroLink original spec, whihc is simultaneous denominated pools, max entropy mixes for the number of inputs/outputs, never 2 or more same previous tx in a same mix, and unequal amount coinjoined spends post-mix if the user chooses.

So no they will not be able to demix everyone. If that happens then why wasabi users were arrested but not sw or sparrow?

If one really talking about privacy wallet then one should never rely on somebody else’s node and run your own. If you say that they are not larping to be totally private right?

Use your imagination instead! 😉😂😆

If you ever want to chain anal your own txns read this series of research or forget about your privacy and ID yourself onchain forever.

https://medium.com/oxt-research/understanding-bitcoin-privacy-with-oxt-part-1-4-8177a40a5923

https://medium.com/oxt-research/understanding-bitcoin-privacy-with-oxt-part-2-4-20010e0dab97

https://medium.com/oxt-research/understanding-bitcoin-privacy-with-oxt-part-3-4-9a1b2b572a8

https://medium.com/oxt-research/understanding-bitcoin-privacy-with-oxt-part-4-4-16cc0a8759d5

The best mobile bitcoin wallet in the world there is no comparison besides sparrow for desktop. Get yourself familiar with it by watching these series and shove your they know my xpubs down your you know what. Use your own node. I can argue the same they know your xpub with ledger live or trezor software or coldcard with public Electrum servers they all will know your xpub if you DON’T run your own backend

The street wallet since 2015 there are no alternatives with zerolink protocol

https://bitcointv.com/w/p/5ZEkK2GUHNL4aLUmnGrZqq

Ther is no eliminate the first step - private keys must be online to sign tx that opens the channel. Anchor amount of sats that stays on chain is hot so in case one needs to bump the fee if it’s too low when yuu opening a channel.

I don’t know what’s ltd? one must create an onchain tx to your LND, c-lightning implementation etc… wallet before you can create channels, private key must sign tx to open a channel, which is an onchain tx to begin with. Whatever left and not in channel are hot utxos.

No, you can have onchain without being inside the channel. It’s a hot wallet. How else you fund the channel? it must be an onchain tx before one can open a channel.