Avatar
boston wine
a80455732d5bfa792f279011a8c871853182971994752b9cf1169611ff91a578
🍷⚡️🤙 This nostrich was hatched on 12.24.22. Backup npub if this gets hacked - please follow: npub1y223ur9kptz3wk6530u8ymtjry2y984s3lg2magw7nu9zwxryauqadfu0s

Sorry! Long press on the zap button on a comment, then hit “public” at the top of the zap customization screen

Click public and then there should be some text that appears and says “make default”

Anon #zaps as default in Damus LFG

⚡️🥷🍷

Ooooh let’s get him

Let’s anon zap the fuck outta this note. What say ye?

note13uuhx9y6rgr9j5wvkyjtyw2c5usk82rkq7vwduhyklh9vzke2r8qs8g4f5

👐🖐️🤞✌️🤌🤙

NFTs and “digital collectibles” are widely regarded as greater-fool scams in the Bitcoin community, and using the Bitcoin blockchain doesn’t change the fact that it’s a borderline predatory practice to sell one sat for a Bitcoin, just because it’s “special”.

Bitcoin Magazine should be free to operate the business as desired… but backlash and disappointment from a (what I assume is) a large segment of your core audience should not be a surprise.

I absolutely agree that growing the Bitcoin user base is important, and there a ton of ways to achieve that.

But Bitcoin Magazine *selling* NFTS doesn’t strike me as a particularly useful way to spur adoption. It feels icky, if anything.

Are you specifically looking for exchanges?

If not, Robosats is very easy to use, secure, and very private.

Oh cool! I see now

Might be better if it were more self evident