Avatar
N of 1
a874c8d3c6ce8886ef8b3bcb004869d61b632d56b3540d420e2298247b4af3ff
I follow my heart and let my mind light the way. Founder of Liberty+ https://libertypl.us https://t.me/liberty_plus

Way to go #Milei !

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

It's not the case for everyone, but for a lot of people, participating in something that they perceive as bigger than themselves is really important. They want to leave a tiny mark that goes beyond their own life in some way in terms of reach or in terms of time.

Sometimes it's religion, sometimes it's patriotism, sometimes it's a certain political/ideological movement, sometimes it's a professional guild, sometimes it is advancing technology, sometimes it is advancing art, etc. Could be any number of things.

Mine is mixed, but it's basically the intersection of technology and human rights. I want to support technologies like Bitcoin and Nostr and others that empower individualism and human rights. People should be able to engage in transfers of information and commerce largely unrestricted. They should be able to protect themselves from currency dilution. They should be able to do this regardless of their race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or whatever, as long as they are not actively trying to hurt others. It should require probable cause and the allocation of deliberate resources and time by authorities to prevent bad people from doing these things, rather than being automatically applied to everyone as a matter of course. And this can't really be asked for; the technology has to be built and shared so that the burden of difficulty is on those trying to make it otherwise.

And for me, that means educating people about these technologies, providing capital or economic guidance to people these technologies, otherwise doing whatever small part I can to help improve the success or adoption of these technologies.

Other than that, I just want to leave my little slice of the world better than I found it. I want to help rather than hurt. I want to beautify rather than destroy. I want to unify differing views through objectivity and open talk and help create collaboration and coexistence, rather than sow unnecessary division. This doesn't scale as well and can't win as decisively as technology can, so it's mainly just my side thing.

What's yours? What is the thing(s) that you want to participate in that are bigger than yourself?

Oh, and to answer your question at the end, the bigger thing for me is my family and friends. My desire to defend them manifests politically as libertarian activism focused on fighting for the same freedom of association for white people that other peoples already enjoy.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

It's not the case for everyone, but for a lot of people, participating in something that they perceive as bigger than themselves is really important. They want to leave a tiny mark that goes beyond their own life in some way in terms of reach or in terms of time.

Sometimes it's religion, sometimes it's patriotism, sometimes it's a certain political/ideological movement, sometimes it's a professional guild, sometimes it is advancing technology, sometimes it is advancing art, etc. Could be any number of things.

Mine is mixed, but it's basically the intersection of technology and human rights. I want to support technologies like Bitcoin and Nostr and others that empower individualism and human rights. People should be able to engage in transfers of information and commerce largely unrestricted. They should be able to protect themselves from currency dilution. They should be able to do this regardless of their race, religion, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, or whatever, as long as they are not actively trying to hurt others. It should require probable cause and the allocation of deliberate resources and time by authorities to prevent bad people from doing these things, rather than being automatically applied to everyone as a matter of course. And this can't really be asked for; the technology has to be built and shared so that the burden of difficulty is on those trying to make it otherwise.

And for me, that means educating people about these technologies, providing capital or economic guidance to people these technologies, otherwise doing whatever small part I can to help improve the success or adoption of these technologies.

Other than that, I just want to leave my little slice of the world better than I found it. I want to help rather than hurt. I want to beautify rather than destroy. I want to unify differing views through objectivity and open talk and help create collaboration and coexistence, rather than sow unnecessary division. This doesn't scale as well and can't win as decisively as technology can, so it's mainly just my side thing.

What's yours? What is the thing(s) that you want to participate in that are bigger than yourself?

I like your use of the term “bigger than yourself” as opposed to “greater than yourself”. The former permits mutually beneficial synergy between the individual and a system/group; thereby maintaining respect for individual rights whilst the latter suggests that a system/group takes moral precedence over the individual.

I know that he hates white people and apologizes for their ongoing replacement. Nothing else about him can offset the enormity of that defect for me.

The “dangerous” information I base the relevance of Maher’s race on is the compendious research of Dr. Kevin Macdonald, as presented in his three books applying sociobiology to jews. All three are available as free pdfs on my website: https://libertypl.us/books-articles-creators/

A significant reason why most us are libertarians is belief in meritocracy. This belief is only held consistently, however, by a subset of white people, specifically by those of Northwestern European ancestry. Notwithstanding libertarian intellectual luminaries like Ayn Rand and Murray Rothbard, jews are overwhelmingly among the most ethnically nepotistic race on earth. Conservation of meritocracy requires using our freedom of disassociation against nepotists of all kinds, and disassociation from jews, who are not only nepotistic but also globalist totalitarians in the outsized political influence they wield, is for these reasons expedient to the advancement of liberty.

I’m not a national socialist or any kind of socialist for that matter. I’m a doctrinaire libertarian like most others here.

Bill Maher is a typical white-hating media jew. In a recent interview with Sharon Osborne he celebrated the demise of English culture; with Joe Rogan he said his home state of New Jersey was “bad” for being white back in the day.

The overwhelming belief in the necessity of "taxation" is compelling evidence against its necessity. Presumably just about everyone who believes in it would voluntarily pay for the services they believe necessary for the state to provide.

Want to do well by doing good? Invest with an eye to tax efficiency.

An enemy of your enemy can still be your enemy. The lesser evil is still evil.

Replying to Avatar pam

Loving the wishlist request and making the most of it. Perhaps a wider setting to the story would be great.

1. Historically, the influence of religions on politics is evident, especially from the 1800s Christian missionaries and colonization to the recent 70s and 80s in Northern Africa, with the rise of anti-American Islamic movements - there are traces of resurgence in liberal Muslim countries enforcing nationwide Palestine peace agenda while demonizing Israel. Is this a global political or religious movement, or both ?

2. This period 70’s / 80s saw the emergence of more militarily oriented Islamic movements originating from Turkey to South Asia, middle east, northern Africa which eventually became liberal when referenced to a more conservative Islamic movement establishment in the 90s such as Talibans. How is Palestine divided between the right and the left ? What’s the influence of Sunni-Shia fight on Palestine ? How are the Mossads integrated into Israel?

3. American influence on global politics, particularly in Muslim countries and the oil industry, gained prominence post WW2, conquering nuclear power lead, and especially after the formation of the CIA. What's the oil agenda / nuke agenda here ? The US is not initiating peace. What’s the game plan ?

4. The BDS (Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions) movement (Chomsky cover’s it well), has both pros and cons. Has it been effective in building world pressure and recognition ?

5. Is this a tipping point for the Palestine movement that has been growing globally over the years ?

6. Would it kill the UN, the US, and people of the world to recognise Palestine as a country ? Were the past efforts truly considered efforts? Or ostensible ?

7. Disparities in livelihood between funded and prohibited regions (Israel - Palestine) and the growth / decline seen through generations

8. Religious teachings preventing contraceptive use as a means to grow religious groups over the years, have now become a political agenda and advanced paternalistic traits. What is the impact of this on the rate of growth of population for both Israel and Palestine?

9. People globally have strong reactions with very little input nor wanting to look at both sides (sometimes I imagine them as furious cute robots emitting smoke emitting smoke out of anger) - what is the underlying psychology behind this and can be linked to early beliefs instilled by local education and media - and is this for the purpose of establishing political grounds? Similar to the concept of “communism is evil” and “Democracy is Hail Mary”.

10. The perspective of conservative Jews and liberal Jews, and the historical impact of the Holocaust on their identity

11. Why are the Jews among the richest in America and yet consider themselves the most oppressed ?

12. A less-discussed angle involving Russia's role in saving Jews during the Holocaust, being the strongest opponents to the Nazis, and their open door policies to the Jews even today is worth exploring.

I am for peace too. But people are too triggered, so I avoid having this conversation all together. Thanks nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a. Good luck on the piece

Good suggestions! The "Holocaust" is mostly Soviet and OSS war propaganda but belief in the propaganda is certainly a driving force in the conflict.

In this era of digital interactivity there's no reason why professional reviewers cannot allow their readers to weight product feature scores given by the former to produce a composite score that reflects the latter's tastes and preferences.

FYI you can bypass YouTube ads by setting your VPN to Moldova.

Eric Striker’s latest entry in his wet dream diary. He’s delusional enough to think that the end of Israel would make any significant dent in the Arab invasion of Europe (the overwhelming majority of Arab refugees are not refugees of war but simply of living in a third world country). He also is delusional enough to think the State Department wouldn’t be able to find a way to waste the future former state of Israel’s foreign aid dole on the 100s of other foreign governments that already receive American taxpayer money. Though of course ZOG will be looking to start WW3 in a Zionist reconquista effort before it even came to that. https://www.unz.com/estriker/four-ways-the-destruction-of-israel-can-benefit-the-west/