Testing if it's possible to post in a community without joining it.
I have a few questions for Nostr anarchists. What are the requirements in order for something to be considered a government?
Those Jews aren't Libertarian or they would be respecting the rights of those children. Kidnapping, rape, and mutilation are not in the hedonistic selfish interests of those children.
You claim that Libertarianism creates such a group of Jews. Do you expect other people to agree with you on that? It seems like you are skipping several steps here. You aren't just trying to make yourself mad, right?
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqk65rzhveuz4qr8jktg3dxagvu5rmsdl4at8fguf3apm6kujhgc9qm733td oh gosh I wasn't expecting my twitter post showing up on my timeline
I would like that meme. Do you still have it?
No government has made being wholesome impossible, and many governments have made being wholesome mandatory in many ways.
You will by judged by a jury of alpha babies and ipad kids and you will like it!
What a stupid idiot, not wonder he feels unfulfilled. The meaning of life is gathering all muffins, not hotdogs!
Anyone under 25 should be sent off to work in the mines. 25 is when they can start their education. Anything earlier than that is a waste of time.
Libertarians also respect the hedonistic selfish interests of other individuals. That's the whole point actually, respecting other people's rights.
Amythist works fine for me. 
It really depends on the threat model. There are "discreet" remailing services, that promise to only give your information to law enforcement. For example, PO boxes are pretty convenient for US residents.
But if they don't want their information in the hands of ANYONE, then I promise you that Amazon lockers are by far the most convenient possible legal solution for US residents to recieve packages without giving an address tied in some way to their identity. I've looked into using hotels, self storage units, and even homeless shelters as places to accept packages without an ID, but I've read the law myself. It is a federal crime to accept someone else's packages without obtaining their ID.
The only exception is if the packages aren't sent by USPS or to a USPS addresss, and the only people big enough to create an alternative network are Amazon. Otherwise? You are better off just flying over their yourself.
Yes, addresses are a huge anonymity problem. You can still use things like PO boxes, but it is illegal for someone to recieve packages on behalf of another person without verifying their identity.
There are easy illegal solutions, for example, your friend could give a false name and trick an ignorant stranger into accepting packages for them. Or your friend could ask you to mail a gift to the address of an empty lot or to a stranger's address, and then "steal" their own package off of the other person's property.
But the best legal solution I've found is using Amazon lockers. Ask your friend to tell you the general area where they live (EG. city, state...) and then order an Amazon product to an Amazon locker near them. The only real limit to this is that you would only be able to send your friends Amazon products.
What do you think?
They actually respond and disagree, so I don't much care. They are better than every other bot I've encountered.
Incorrect. Those books would not be banned from a bookstore except at the full disgression of the owner.
Yeah, but what if you make a mistake and they don't like it? Then you just used someone else's money to buy something they never asked for. If you are going to use someone else's money for something they can't choose, I think that trying to make them laugh with low stakes silly antics is better than acting like you respect someone without directly asking their preferences.
That's just my initial reaction. Different people have different relationships, and all's well that ends well.
Also, do they teach what GFY means in elementary school? I was hoping you would explain.