Not sure if you're trolling or intentionally turning a blind eye to one of Bitcoin's flaws.
Fungibility has nothing to do with "choosing to see or ignore information" or "choosing to treat some coins as new". Any information that CAN be known is the problem. In Bitcoin the entire coin history can be known. With cash, the entire history cannot be seen. No matter what you choose to believe, there literally is no record of who held the coins and when.
Cash and coins are mostly fungible. When you accept cash or coins, there is no record attached showing where they have been.
Monero is probably the best crypto for fungibility, but it comes with a scalability tradeoff (not that Bitcoin is much more scalable though, tbh)
Agreed, this book is for all skill levels. Whether you've worked in bitcoin for 10 years, or if this is your first time even seeing a computer, this book will have something for you.
#plebchain
Will someone please make ChadGPT? Its like ChatGPT, but 1000% based.
#plebchain #grownostr
When it comes to #bitcoin, all I have is entry points. #nevergonnaexit
#based
Not sure how that relates to the OP, however, sacrificing objectivity does not empower decentralizaed consensus. At best you'll get decentralisation without consensus (e.g. everyone forms their own truth), but more likely you'll get centralization. As it pertains to OP, idk how this can be considered an improvement to Bitcoin
And then pull out phone to check if the gentlemen tipped you or not? Idk if that'll work in the club, boss
QR on panties, then pull out your phone and check if a payment was received? Hmmm, not sure that'll work
I hear you about fixing degeneracy and what not, but Bitcoin has to work for even the most degenerate or criminal uses for it to succeed as money. This was kinda a silly example, but the point was serious.
Ethereum maxis will even admit this... its not exactly controversial. Ethereum sacrifices objectivity to save electricity. #bitcoin burns electricity for objective consensus, because Bitcoin was built for the real world, where you can't trust your peers to be honest.
Idk how you can say its objectively better. PoS is literally subjective consensus. Not sure if you're being ironic, but here's a short lesson if not:
In PoS validators can build two different ledgers at zero cost, and the only way to know which ledger is the real ledger is to connect to the network and see which ledger all your peers consider to be valid: i.e. subjective decision
In #bitcoin, there is an objective way to determine which ledger is correct: choose the ledger with the most work. No matter what your peers say, or what the devs say, you know the 'best' ledger is the 'heaviest' ledger. No subjectivity allowed.
If #bitcoin is the future of money, how will strippers collect if there isn't any paper bitcoin to tuck into their underwear? Are stripper's just going to get a receive address tattooed to their ass cheek? Then do they pull out their phone to check if you tipped them?
If it cant be stuffed in someones underwear, can it ever really become money?
#plebchain #freedom #stuffbigcoininmyundies
#bitcoin
Hypothetical question: if a new technology came out that was better than #bitcoin in every way (decentralisation, SoV, coin distribution, or whatever else you can think of), would you embrace it, or reject it and keep pushing Bitcoin?
Before I get flame roasted... I don't know of any such technology. I'm just posing a hypothetical to see whether people are backing 'the general idea of Bitcoin' or just backing the specific Bitcoin ledger we all know today.
And hopefully no Google Play dependencies for those of us running Calyx & GrapheneOS