Avatar
SimplifiedPrivacy.com
ac3f6afe17593f61810513dac9a1e544e87b9ce91b27d37b88ec58fbaa9014aa
Give me Liberty, or Give me Death. HydraVeil is our Revolutionary New Linux app that allows you to create different isolated profiles, to resist AI Browser Fingerprinting from Cloudflare & Big Tech. Another feature of HydraVeil is routing your traffic though your choice of WireGuard or a Tor->Socks5 proxy (to evade Tor blocks), and to fool CDN packet speed tracing with different IPs for each profile. Additionally, we provide VPN service for Android, iPhone, Windows, Mac, and Routers. Tune in to our Podcast to combat Big Tech surveillance. Help me, help you. Hashtags: #Cypherpunk, Open source, #Linux, DeGoogled Phones, self-hosted services, #Monero, #Security, and more!

There are currently multiple Haveno networks

Guest Post by my friend, nostr:npub1m5s9w4t03znyetxswhgq0ud7fq8ef8y3l4kscn2e8wkvmv42hh3qujgjl3

Quote:

At least 2 separate Haveno networks have launched as of today. One is called Reto and the other is called HardenedSteel. Those are the only ones I’m aware of right now, and things are happening pretty fast.

The haveno software was designed with the assumption that only a single network would be operated. People could fork it and run their own networks, but they wouldn’t interact directly at all. But it looks to me as of this moment this is not how it is going to play out.

The client has the network info hard coded. So to use more than one, you need two copies of the client. This means that for most people they have to pick one. And, users might not understand this, just google “haveno” and pull the first git repo they see. This has significant, fast moving and quickly ossifying network effects with big repercussions.

We need to be very vigilant right now, as we are about to witness the very swift rise of a major power broker in our community. We don’t want to start using a Haveno network run by scammers or authoritarians. Each network is it’s arbitrators, and soon, the merchants on each one.

I think it’s probably a good idea to figure out a way to connect to multiple networks, and to show listings with details about which network/arbitrator set a user is trusting when taking up a listing.

I’m cautiously optimistic, Monero has gotten rid of powerful people without a hitch before. But it is a bigger community now and that will be much harder to do. If we are vigilant during this time and we get through this successfully I think we become unbeatable, but the road directly ahead of us is treacherous, the next few days are going to move very fast.

Source:

https://monero.town/post/3138955

Mister_Monster's Nostr:

npub1m5s9w4t03znyetxswhgq0ud7fq8ef8y3l4kscn2e8wkvmv42hh3qujgjl3

Internet structure is lame:

a) Domain names are the government's opinion of your identity

b) SSL Encryption is not even based on these flawed domains, even worse than that, it's based on locations, so the cloud host owns everything

c) Even worse than that, not just the cloud host owns it, but on top of that Cloudflare sees everything. You submit your password, Cloudflare's CDN sees it. They own every account you thought you owned.

d) Even worse than that, Websites won't even let you JUST have a password. You need to email to verify, which is completely insecure nonsense that is now having a different 2nd cloud company own your account on the first one's servers.

e) Web browsers are running whatever code they want. You're a bitch that just has to accept their code.

f) Web browsers are dominated by Google & Mozilla, both left-leaning anti-privacy companies.

I reject this.

Instead, I promote the idea of Agnostic Encryption as Identity. And what this means is:

1) Using Encryption as Identity with open source clients.

2) Empower the end user with choices among both clients and protocols.

3) End users have all the power. Servers are an irrelevant commodity

4) Avoiding tying identities to particular servers

5) Communication between keypair systems to reduce the number of clients or extensions the person has to download. We assume disagreement, if you curse me out then you prove my point.

6) Cross-communication to increase the access and availability of content, and the network effect of all encryption as identity.

yeah sure, tell that to your co-workers and boss doing collab docs

This lawmaker doesn’t even make sense, if someone is protesting cruel conditions, how does it make your cause more just to put them in the very conditions they protest? You’re just proving them right, that you are insane and inhumane.

nostr:nevent1qqsqqqqrunhqyapnlwjwcjkg5pflvnysjynuh2ax5dj0mmdtq4c23rgpzemhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2un9d3shjtnrdakj74vh2f2

Got a friend new to Nostr?

Send em this. One of our readers made original cartoon art to show how it works. I wish I had seen this when I first started, it makes it so simple. Even the Tor Onions:

https://rebelnet.me/news/49b239288887089cfc18

Monero Wallet built into Signal

This uses the Molly client fork. Molly interacts with Signal’s official AWS servers, but is a more free version code wise, and has better local security. Now someone has added an XMR wallet to this.

https://github.com/mollyim/monero-wallet-sdk

fair enough man, thanks

Not AS BAD as google docs, but still horrible. Still data collection. But not as malicious use and intent. consider switching to Free and open source =)

Cryptpad vs NextCloud: the anti-Google.

Google docs is so toxic, because it fingerprints your writing style and keyboard mannerisms, to permanently and maliciously identify other new accounts as you. [1] They will claim this is to show you “relevant ads”, but we’ve documented numerous times their contracts with governments to mold society’s opinions and jail users. [2][3]

In order to make sure they can maliciously identify you for profit, Google docs will not display correctly, unless you disable aggressive fingerprint blocking techniques. For example Brave browser on “Strict Fingerprinting” will cause Google docs to be unreadable.

But you can ditch the tyrannical dystopia with Cryptpad or NextCloud. BOTH of these are great for team collaborations, and we can add email and chat to both of these. This is open source software that’s run on a VPS (virtual private server), aka your own tiny cloud. Let’s compare the pros and cons:

Pros of Cryptpad:

--end-to-end-encryption on shared documents

--Less resource intensive, you can have a smaller VPS and save money

Cons of Cryptpad:

--Focus is on docs, it can do other stuff, but it’s not really focused on it

--It has to be in a web browser, no apps to download

--Hypothetically the server admin could spoof the whole website to phish incoming decryption passwords, but this true for ALL web browser services.

Pros of NextCloud:

--Direct integration with to-do lists, calendars, email, and Video chat integrations make it great for business teams. (Our Cryptpad setups for have email and chat too, its just a different panel)

--Great for documents and a variety of other files

--open source mobile apps

Cons of NextCloud:

--No end-to-end encryption. Much less secure than Cryptpad

--Zero protection from the cloud host

--Takes more resources and therefore costs more to run

--Requires optimization for speed

In general, we recommend Cryptpad for smaller businesses or individuals, and NextCloud for larger teams. Simplified Privacy is proud to offer setups for either, jammed packed with email and chat on your own VPS. You pick the domain name, you pick what kind of chat (XMPP, SimpleX, ect). And you get handed over ALL credentials (root access), which you can change afterwards. See some pictures: https://simplifiedprivacy.com/email-cloud-combo/

If morality is subjective, what is the purpose?

As that means I can commit crimes, and say that to me, it subjectively feels right.

If we were to have a vote, mob rule might swing to move law in a certain direction.

Be that bomb Palestine.

Be that Hitler’s camps.

Be that starve Yemen.

Whatever, 100 examples...

The point is the foundation of individual liberty is to have rights regardless of the majority’s vote.

The only way to maintain these freedoms against the majority is with an objective standard.

nostr:nevent1qqs8jdvf3c590wpk370x0xzutx53s4syqmg5kvustrnutqpef5wykegpzpmhxue69uhkztnwdaejumr0dshszyrhwden5te0v5hxummn9ekx7mp0qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uy9nvue

The Session group has grown bigger, it's now the most active of all our rooms.

If you ask tech/privacy questions here, you'll get interesting discussion. You go to “Join Community” and add this URL:

https://session.simplifiedprivacy.is/simplified?public_key=ed33150048005a9237708314785af91f5dfe0d9eafd8a66df6e9977cc9619431

What are ethics? Ethics are a subset of heuristics for desision making. The subset consists of decisions that affect other sentient beings. Many decisions don't (should I drink water now or later) but some do (should I steal this motorbike).

The moon has no ethics. Algae probably has no ethics. Mice have limited ethics, generally related to how their decisions affect fellow mice.

Ethics are mostly hardwired into you when your brain developed, and they were determined genetically. If we didn't have this hardwiring, the cost of thinking through a decision would be overwhelming (the game theory is incredibly deep) putting you at a huge survival disadvantage. But ethics can be learned from society (necessary adaptation!) and also consciously chosen. Although I'd argue that we have far less ability to consciously choose our ethics than we think we do.

Because ethics come in part from society, children have big wide openings in their underdeveloped ethical systems. Children will often believe that stealing, murdering, cheating, etc, might be the smartest move. It takes parents and/or life experience to discover this is almost always incorrect. Some adults have "arrested development" and continue to operate with under-developed ethics. These people tend to be in and out of the prison system. We could argue about whether this is genetic or developmental or environmental or societal, but that would make this post far too long and more controversial than I was intending it to be.

The ethics that a Christian has and the ethics that an athiest has are different:

1. Athiests don't believe there is any ethics to praying, going to church, or paying tithe to the local minister, keeping the sabbath, not eating pork, or any other god-given rules from a god they don't believe exists, wherein the rule is esoteric and doesn't affect their fellow sentient beings.

2. Athiests feel it is unethical to disrespect the non-standard sexuality of a person, whether homosexual or transgender, whereas Christians appear to believe it is unethical to have non-standard sexuality in the first place.

3. When it comes to treating others with the "golden rule", the ethical systems are virtually identical, except:

4. Religious people have some carve outs for stealing and murdering (as evidenced by Israel).

If I have a choice of dealing with an atheist or a theist, I feel safer dealing with the atheist.

I've heard some Christians who believe the world would be much worse if it were not for Christians. That without Christianity, people would partake in all kinds of activities they feel are unethical: stealing, cheating, murdering, etc. But if it is only your religion that prevents you from doing those things, that frightens me. I would *hope* you were born with (and developed) ethics that prevent you from doing those things just because they feel very wrong. So for people who think they would benefit from harming others, please keep going to church!

I don't know any Palestinians. I don't think I even know any Arabs. And yet I feel great empathy towards Palestinian women and children and doctors and aid workers when they die. If atheist's ethics were only selfish, I wouldn't feel like this.

Yeah I agree ethics are hardwired for survival to be part of a group. Yes I’d agree on the words “game theory” are a good way to frame it.

What do you think of Ayn Rand and Objectivism? With objective morality

Farcaster's Warpcast app is total bullshit.

--Forced payments via Google play store. No Degoogled phones.

What is the purpose of Ethereum if it’s forced Google play.

--Bans Tor. Since when is something decentralized if a single provider has the power to ban specific IP addresses?

--Forced link to email. The whole point of Ethereum is we don’t want government domains

--I don’t mind paying nodes or network fees, but not a central gatekeeper on Big Tech.

What are you smoking bro? How are we going to set it up without having the SSH keys.

Then we hand it over to the customer (which I’m assuming isn’t going to be you because you’re a spamming troll), and then they can change it.