Both the left & right support digital IDs
It's critical to the UN tyranny agenda, that the CBDC is linked to some form of digital ID
Donald Trump markets this as "input output biometric ID", to stop illegal immigration. He used to be for a physical wall, but now it's facial recognition, backed by Palantir AI with Peter Thiel giving him money.
The left markets this as "vaccine passports", to save lives from horrible infectious disease. And to distribute "universal basic income".
It doesn't matter what form this ID comes in, please my brother and friend, resist it with everything you got.
They will promise you money.
They will promise you access to something.
They will promise to solve immigration.
But the only thing it will solve, is their current problem of free speech.
[Shoutout to the: Independent Media Alliance, with Whittney Webb, Ryan Christian, and Iain Davis. We stand with you]
Monero bouncing back
We survived the Kraken EU delisting
You're calling me a shitcoin, And that's ironic,
Because the look of you holding in your anger everytime we stay alive, looks like you're constipated
ALL BITCOIN WALLETS ARE CUSTODIAL WALLETS ON WINDOWS.
If you're using Stock Google Android, iPhone, and/or Windows,
You're wasting your time with SimpleX, Nostr, Bitcoin, and Monero.
I know you don't want to hear this and the truth is grim. You can enjoy liking memes and shit, but if your private keys are owned by the adversary:
It's all just for show at that point.
Freedom tech on top of a bad base, is like a skyscraper on quick sand.
But there's hope: Linux is free and you're smart.
Value is subjective and exists in the mind of the consumer.
If you are able to make a living solely off accepting and using Bitcoin, good for you.
But it sounds like you're earning using fiat banks and just happen to own a tiny amount of Bitcoin. In which case, you're a slave in the system. And in fact, promoting government propaganda. Sounds like you're rolling in the grass because you're homeless.
Microsoft Tyranny Agenda:
1) Create a culture where you're discriminated against employment unless you have a Linked-In
2) Force you to verify your real details on Linked-In.
3) By agreeing to be on Linked-In, you agree to train AI on your data, and monitor the web of all human interaction
4) Allow radical woke socialists to view your real job details, so they can cancel and control you. This purges "freedom speech" from positions of power.
5) Pressure you take drugs (labeling it a vaccine), to keep the job.
The end goal is to crush freedom, by forcing anyone who isn't self-employed to be cancellable. And by controlling everyone's visible on the platform, they control the flow of funds.
The answer is clear: Start a business, accept cryptocurrency, and communicate through means you control.
so don't use "shitcoins", at the end of the day you can swap it into whatever you want. So if you want to limit your customer base and miss out on all the other websites I listed, no problem. you can be poorer
nostr:npub14a6q6xvt4wuv0wpdpfr336e4fweldtu6np3ehpw55h83xuw2h2zsgyz6rn would be happy to help you
like my personal products, or the idea of debanking via using crypto?
WordPress Civil War!
Wordpress.org and Wordpress.com are fighting in court
The non-profit .org blocked the for-profit .com from accessing critical resources, like plugins from being updated, because they claim they aren't "giving back", in other words, paying money for using the name and trademark.
Who is right? They both suck, I don't care about the complex history! This highlights that external plugins are barely under your control, and wordpress is bloat.
It's bad enough that people rely on some random developer of a third party plugin, but then on top of that, to wonder if the dictator WordPress organization will block your DNS access to that random developer's update? This is essentially allowing the WordPress organization to own your VPS.
Death to WordPress on Cloudflare
Long Live Hugo on Arweave
it is. but what about spending and earning.
If there was more bitcoin job sites, I'd be happy to post em
Fighting about the forex only divides us
notice I did not make any reference to "buy". I said "earn" and "spend"
the bitcoin culture of "hodl" is fine for long term savings... but doesn't address the issue of getting off banks
who said you got high bills? it's $1 bills you gotta count, and some dirty nickels
first directly via garnet, a client with XMR tipping, but the bigger way is through promoting a business that accepts any crypto
Other issues with cash:
-Can't transact instantly with anyone on the planet.
-More difficult to verify authenticity on-the-fly.
-Not as easily divisible (Need to carry specific denominations and change)
-Can't trustlessly exchange for crypto (no atomic swaps)
-Can't have multiple people with simultaneous ownership and control over the same cash (multisig)
"HOW DO I GET MONERO?" 👇
https://paste.sethforprivacy.com/?e839f39d0171a97b#Cx6NMmUdH25dmkq2ux54gu6h4vEND28hkPohQY9aEEej
"WHERE CAN I SPEND MONERO?" 👇
https://paste.sethforprivacy.com/?3eac26d0ca24bfa7#8eeQGJMxpFxz4cYXPBZhH5pcLNWzUSVzArErXqcndGqj
thanks good points
sure, we offer setups of this including the domain, first month of the VPS, and a full year of support:
https://simplifiedprivacy.com/email-cloud-combo/index.html
Unlike the other softwares out there, you get more than one service on the VPS,
and at the end, we hand over all passwords
Earn:
XMRBazaar, BitcoinTalk, MoneroMarket(io), MoneroTown, Monerica, Nostr
Spend:
CakeWallet, CoinCards, Bitrefill, MoonPay
The issue with credit cards is:
--Full surveillance
--You own nothing, government is your master
--Banks urinate on you with inflation
--FDIC is worthless in an interest rate financial crisis, look at what happened when the Fed jacked last round. Cali banks went bust.
--World Bank and IMF trap the third world in perpetual debt. And you're enabling this slavery by placing value on the promises of the oppressor
The issue with cash is:
--You're carrying a large amount of paper
--Easy to lose it
--Easy to get robbed
--Harder to track & control your spending
--Still inflation urinates on you, and you get 0 interest.
--Counting large amounts sucks, you're literally all day counting paper from one hand to another? Your hands hurt, you can't jack off.
Protonmail is propaganda, as it encourages centralization. Yes the self-host VPS provider can see it, but so can proton. This puts all eggs in one basket, which is a corrupt and easily accessed basket. Please see the following I wrote earlier:
~
First, Proton is NOT end-to-end encrypted. As per own their blog:
https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained
(Please note, I only changed the CAPS)
Quote:
"The email is encrypted in transit using TLS. It is THEN UNENCRYPTED and re-encrypted (by us) for storage on our servers using zero-access encryption. Once zero-access encryption has been applied, no-one except you can access emails stored on our servers (including us). It is NOT end-to-end encrypted, however, and might be accessible to the sender’s email service"
Second, they do scan it for spam and phising.
They repeat this with:
Source: https://proton.me/blog/encrypted-email-spam-filtering
"Emails that come from third party email providers obviously CANNOT be delivered with end-to-end encryption, but upon reaching our mail servers, we will encrypt them with the recipient’s public key before saving the messages(new window). All this is done in memory so that by the time anything is permanently stored to disk, the email is already un-readable to us. This gives us a very limited window to perform spam filtering on incoming messages."
Then they further elaborate,
"Secondly, the message is passed through our customized Bayesian filters which marks suspicious messages as spam.
Next, we generate checksums of incoming messages and check them against a database of known spam messages. If there is a match, we mark the message as spam. The checksums are done in such a way that it is also effective against mutating spam emails."
So they claim to have it unencrypted, then have a "limited time" to stop spam, but then also claim to encrypt it, and then after compare the hash to spam hash. If their own claims were true, then why do they only have a limited time?
Third, they hand over huge amounts of data. If it's encrypted, then what do they have to hand over?
From their own transparency report:
https://proton.me/legal/transparency
"2023
Number of legal orders: 6,378
Contested orders: 407
Orders complied with: 5,971
2022
Number of legal orders: 6,995
Contested orders: 1,038
Orders complied with: 5,957"
While as with a self-host VPS,
With a large amount of effort, the VPS provider could in theory snapshot memory to get access to emails. But this data is being sent through SSL encryption, so passive general surveillance is protected against. It would have to be work (and money wasted) for them to get the data.
Google is Totalitarian.
The police dragged Google’s internal employees out of the building in handcuffs, just to get them to stop protesting.
As we’ll get to in a moment, that’s just the visible physical world, the real censorship you never hear about is digital.
This article directly benefits you, because you need persuasive examples to convince your friends, co-workers, or family to stop using Gmail or docs. It takes two to tango.
In this juicy article, we’ll cover:
a) Election Manipulation
b) Surveillance and Substitution to “Program the population”
c) Removal of Dictionary Translation Words for politics
d) Blocking the keywords “cure cancer”
e) Suppression of small businesses, even unrelated to politics
f) Firing and arresting their own employees
Manipulated Elections
It likely won’t surprise you to hear that Google and it’s employees are among the biggest donors to Kamala Harris, with well over a million in donations, but yet they have given zero to Donald Trump. [1] But what you may not be aware of, is even mid-level employees are confessing to abusive election manipulation.

Ad Manipulation
In a leaked viral video, Google’s Growth strategy employee Dakota Leazer, openly admits to a stranger on a dinner date that the company actively manipulates the ad results to favor Kamala Harris. Their manipulation strategy is to pretend that ads that Kamala is paying for, are from third parties such as PBS to hide the bias in her favor. In this leaked video, Leazer confesses the company looks to ABUSE FEAR tactics in anti-Trump ads to make more money. [2]
Supression
There are so many whistleblowers we can not even cover them all. Zach Vorhies, was an engineer who worked for Google’s AI and search divisions. He was so shocked by their totalitarian manipulation of search results, that he leaked over 900 pages of Google slides, emails, and memos to the DoJ. These documents show how they purposefully surpress certain news outlets, viewpoints, and data. [3a]
SEO is a Lie
Many people mistakenly think that Google ranks news articles based on how many keywords or inbound links they get or match. Vorhies leaked internal slides clearly demonstrate the truth behind SEO, which is that each news outlet is given a direct ranking score, based on management making a subjective opinion on the “channel’s quality”. The largest factor in the rankings is how much it aligns with the political views they wish to push: [3b]

Removing Translation Words
The cataylst for Zach Vorhies to speak out, was when he saw Google removing translation words from the Arabic to English translation dictonary, for the purpose of making Donald Trump’s tweets seem crazy. Then in coordination with the legacy media, the 25th Amendment could be invoked to argue Trump was unfit for the presidency, because he was tweeting nonsense. [3b]
Profit from Violence
As I have pointed out previously, Google is a military cloud contractor. Given what we learned from both Vorhies and Leazer’s testimony, it is not unreasonable to think that, in the future, they would remove Russian or Arabic translation words to prevent peace, as Google profits from war.
Program People
Also within these leaked documents, was clear references to “programming people”. As Vorhies explained in an interview on the Jim Rutt podcast, the goal was to serve the user the inputs (via search results), and have them produce their own content (writing/podcasts/videos) as the outputs. Then this user produced content could be promoted by the algorithm, to reinforce the belief that the agenda Google’s executives picked was widespread and societal. [3b]

Fake Buttons
Zach Vorhies also leaked internal memos suggesting that a method to make users feel comfortable with censorship, was to give them fake buttons, to give users a false sense of control. The idea was to give the users fake dials that didn’t work, or did some minor trivial change. So the user felt like they were still in control, even though the censorship remained. [3b]
Cure Cancer Blacklisted
Vorhies slides discuss the blacklisted search phrases that can’t produce real results on Youtube. Shockingly this includes “cure cancer” and “cancer cure”. Not any particular person with bad information, but the entire idea. Likely this is because Big Pharma buys search ads.
Selling Manipulation
By talking about this, I risk having our entire business suppressed.
Moonshot CVE
Google’s Jigsaw division has partnered with Moonshot CVE to sell search engine manipulation services to the US government. They openly store IP addresses, addresses, names (if they can get it), and search queries for the general population. And then if they label you an “extremist”, forward your traffic to what they deem to be the truth. [9][10]
Extremists
And what defines “extremist views”? They pretend that it’s just violence, but it extends far beyond that to include vaccine hesitancy, researching Waco, distrust of harder immigration policies, and gender views. They are comparing violent jihad extremists to questioning the covid “vaccines”, immigration, or gender surgery on social media. And treating them the same as terrorists in their redirect program. [10][11]

Leaked Github code shows they use Chrome Browser to track real time clicks and movement on pages, which makes it easier to manipulate you: [5]

Even Gmail
Some mistakenly think that because they aren’t a public Youtube figure, they will be allowed to speak. But Google surpresses even Gmail from eldlerly citizens. A 76-year-old woman in Jacksonville is suing Google for deplatforming her about an hour after she emailed members of her pro-life group calling for a peaceful Catholic Mass and gathering in front of A Woman’s Choice, an abortion business in Florida. [4a]
11 Years Lost
“Trudy Perez-Poveda says Google targeted her after she sent the correspondence through Gmail. Google refused to allow Perez-Poveda to access her more than 11-year trove of stored emails, photographs, calendars, contacts and other data, her attorneys say.” [4b]
Even not political
Github Leak
Some mistakenly think that because they aren’t talking about politics, they will be given a fair opportunity in life. However, leaked Github API code demonstrates that Google’s algorithm openly favors larger corporations for SEO, even if the smaller blogger offered more specialized expertise. [5]
Even worse, the leaked code showed there was literally a sandbox for smaller websites, despite Google employees previously denying this.
Oppress Small Businesses
Detailed and elaborate research from the small business “HouseFresh” on their own SEO, demonstrates Google’s incredible bias against smaller competitors, even if their prices are lower and their product is objectively of higher quality. [6]
Degrade Search
In a different study entitled “Is Google degrading search?”, Yelp’s statistical researcher, Tim Wu, focused on eCommerce and found Google promoted it’s own content above organic results, but when objectively tested, audiences were 45% more likely to engage with search results that were organically determined. [7]
Google is a raging hypocrite because they both:
a) Manipulate the results to favor Democrat politicians, who supposedly want to end inequality
b) Manipulate the results to favor large businesses at the expense of smaller ones, which literally creates inequality
https://simplifiedprivacy.com/posts/big-tech/google-totalitarian/images/protest-google.webp
Silence their own employees
Over 50 internal employees were fired for protesting Google’s work to design AI that murders Palestinians by drone. [8a] Eight had to be arrested to get them to stop protesting. [8b]
Only after the police dragged these employees out in handcuffs, and Google’s management released statements about removing opinions from the workplace, was the company able to continue their profitable Palestinian AI-drone slaughter.
Let’s bring it home…
Google’s only power exists in your mind.
It’s only because you use their services, do they have any control over you. It’s hard to avoid given other people’s choices, but not impossible. This article gave you some sources and ammo to persuade those who try to force you. But you’ve got to spin it in terms the person you’re trying to convince cares about. I believe in you.
Links to our YaCy search engine instances:
https://simplifiedprivacy.com/search.html
List of DeGoogle Alternatives:
https://simplifiedprivacy.com/degoogled-life/index.html
The sources for this article can be found here:
https://simplifiedprivacy.com/sources/google-totalitarian/sources.html
It doesn't surprise me that,
SimpleX is under attack by corrupt liar Wired:
"Neo-Nazis Are Fleeing Telegram for Encrypted App SimpleX Chat"
https://www.wired.com/story/neo-nazis-flee-telegram-encrypted-app-simplex/
What DOES surprise me is the reaction of developer Evgeny Poberezkin,
Here's the quote from the article:
"And Poberezkin believes that the current limitations of his technology will mean these groups will eventually abandon SImpleX.
“SimpleX is a communication network, rather than a service or a platform, where users can host their own servers, like in Open Web, so we were not aware that extremists have been using it,” says Poberezkin. “We never designed groups to be usable for more than 50 users and we’ve been really surprised to see them growing to the current sizes despite limited usability and performance. We do not think it is technically possible to create a social network of a meaningful size in the SimpleX network.”"
This is surprising because Evgeny told us that groups could scale by reducing the reliance on a single invite link, so anyone could enter via any group member or "super members".
In fact, even from his own tweets, just 2 days prior:
"We agree that once group can scale, they will help growth."
Source: https://xcancel.com/SimpleXChat/status/1841561127320199583#m
This is the danger of doing cypherpunk stuff, with government money venture capital and registered LLCs. At the slightest push from the mainstream media, he changes his tune.
I like Evgeny. He's a good guy. And I DON'T blame him for trying to stop his company from being associated with bad actors. But we need to be honest here, he's trying to have his cake and eat it too. He wants to be a cypherpunk, but collect the paycheck of a corporation.
What he should have said to Wired is: "This technology is like the printing press. It improves our lives and offers all of this freedom. But once it's made, the inventor can't control what people say. Do you really want to live in a world without the press, Wired?"