Avatar
palladion
af9ba3328df76a34fd6d8e18f6aa5320c42d72a587ffa056eb616a26b556ec65
netrunner in Glass

You know that this was due to the implementation of “unsolvable math” so your point is moot. Would happen on any device unless you use brain math or something that does not require an implementation of some sorts.

A lot of positive energy, we are early, there is much to be built, make UX better; let’s get to work.

nostr:npub1sn0wdenkukak0d9dfczzeacvhkrgz92ak56egt7vdgzn8pv2wfqqhrjdv9 🫂

Replying to Avatar waxwing

Interesting to observe that Schnorr's protocol for proving knowledge of discrete log (which for the TLDR people is kind of the "primitive" behind the Schnorr signature) is really actually a tweak on a pre-existing idea from a paper by Chaum, Evertse and van de Graaf in '87.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-39118-5_13.pdf

Specifically the construction `s = k + ex` is already present in that work. The main tweak is that Schnorr proposes the variable `e` being a "full" random group element, whereas that paper proposes iterations with `e` being only a bit. It's the same basic thing.

Schnorr actually references it in his original paper on "Efficient Identification and Signatures for Smart Cards", and he also develops the idea more than that, so I'm not accusing of plagiarism or something; just pointing out yet another reason why having a patent on this is so stupid.

(I mean patent aside, it's also of historical interest. Yet another example of Chaum being "the GOAT" as the kids say).

Didn’t the patent expire already? So alls good, the genie doesn’t go back into the box.

Saw the history of money in the Kunsthistorische Museum Vienna today. There was everything in there except Bitcoin—that’s the future. https://nostrcheck.me/media/public/nostrcheck.me_8868684459024324901691872702.webp

Started to ask at every place whether I can pay with $BTC—I am doing my part anon.

Replying to Avatar Beautyon

If anyone interested in Bitcoin's aims wants Bitcoin to succed, they're going to have to temper their OCD impulses and understand the true nature and severity of threats. There is a never ending list of potential threats both demonstrated and theoretical that can harm people, but the truth of the matter is non linear and related to scale.

Micro$soft Winblows was known to be insecure out of the box for decades. The NSA had encryption keys delivered with every copy of Winblows, sold or pirated. Winblows 10 is the most popular version of Winblows, with over 1 billion active users. That means there are a billion people on an insecure operating system that violates their privacy and their rights.

And yet...

The world keeps spinning. People make use of the Internets. Passwords get stolen, people lose data, but none of it is enough to stop all the systems that rely on Winblows and the users. Everyone is getting their work done, being paid, managing their money and living normal lives.

And this is the key. You can live a normal life if you use Micro$soft Winblows. It doesn't matter that it is imperfect, or that someone can get your password just by hearing you type Blink182 on your keyboard. Security is a good thing, and it is better to be more secure, but it is not the purpose of computers and using them to get work done.

Bering this in mind, what is the utility of spreading fear to ordinary people who are easily frightened and who take the word of experts as gospel? Who does it help to tell people that if they type in their own homes, someone can reconstruct their private writing? What's worse is telling people this and then not offering any answer other than, "BE VERY FRIGHTENED".

This relates directly to Bitcoin, in case you didn't know. If these same people are listened to, no one would ever touch Bitcoin, because they see the world only in terms of threats and negative outcomes that are grossly exaggerated. The vast majority of people will never experience any problem with Bitcoin, just as the vast majority of iPhone users never experience any problems.

Since the iPhone 1, 2.4 billion iPhones have been sold world-wide. This is a staggering number of satisfied customers. Bitcoiners (or at least, people claiming to be Bitcoiners) must think before they open their mouths to spread FUD about Bitcoin. Bitcoin is very safe, just like the iPhone is, and if the tools being used on it are well written and designed, Bitcoin can be very safe; certainly safe enough to change the world.

Part of what's coming with "Consumer Bitcoin is"If you're not already mitigating the risk of someone *hearing* you type your passwords, you should probably start... It always seemed like a probable risk, but now it's confirmed:

If anyone interested in Bitcoin's aims wants Bitcoin to succed, they're going to have to temper their OCD impulses and understand the true nature and severity of threats. There is a never ending list of potential threats both demonstrated and theoretical that can harm people, but the truth of the matter is non linear and related to scale.

Micro$soft Winblows was known to be insecure out of the box for decades. The NSA had encryption keys delivered with every copy of Winblows, sold or pirated. Winblows 10 is the most popular version of Winblows, with over 1 billion active users. That means there are a billion people on an insecure operating system that violates their privacy and their rights.

And yet...

The world keeps spinning. People make use of the Internets. Passwords get stolen, people lose data, but none of it is enough to stop all the systems that rely on Winblows and the users. Everyone is getting their work done, being paid, managing their money and living normal lives.

And this is the key. You can live a normal life if you use Micro$soft Winblows. It doesn't matter that it is imperfect, or that someone can get your password just by hearing you type Blink182 on your keyboard. Security is a good thing, and it is better to be more secure, but it is not the purpose of computers.

Bering this in mind, what is the utility of spreading fear to ordinary people who are easily frightened and who take the word of experts as gospel? Who does it help to tell people that if they type in their own homes, someone can reconstruct their private writing? What's worse is telling people this and then not offering any answer other than, BE VERY FRIGHTENED.

This relates directly to Bitcoin, in case you didn't know. If these same people are listened to, no one would ever touch Bitcoin, because they see the world only in terms of threats and negative outcomes that are grossly exaggerated. The vast majority of people will never experience any problem with Bitcoin, just as the vast majority of iPhone users never experience any problems.

Since the iPhone 1, 2.4 billion iPhones have been sold world-wide. This is a staggering number of satisfied customers. Bitcoiners (or at least, people claiming to be Bitcoiners) must think before they open their mouths to spread FUD about Bitcoin. Bitcoin is very safe, just like the iPhone is, and if the tools being used are well written and designed, Bitcoin can be very safe.

Part of what's coming with Consumer Bitcoin is the diminishing of the hysterical, anti-human, deranged and delusional voices that cast the light of fear on Bitcoin, replacing them with Apple style thinking and attitudes which are pro consumer from the bottom up. This change in culture, or more accurately, the replacement of Bitcoin Culture, is going to form an essential part of the mass onboarding. the diminishing of the hysterical, anti-human, deranged and delusional voices that cast the light of fear on Bitcoin, replacing them with Apple style thinking and attitudes which are pro consumer from the bottom up. This change in culture, or more accurately, the replacement of Bitcoin Culture, is going to form an essential part of the mass onboarding.

I always liked that when I did academic research. Either find fringe security issues and show what is possible or work on issues where the cost/benefit is heavily tilted towards making people more secure with simple methods.

Issues only arise if someone wants to sell their rare security issue to the masses through fear. I tend to liken it to an immune system. Yeah we might get sick from time to time, we even might get a serious illness, to optimize for a good life, one should focus on living their lives and not be stifled by fear over what might happen. Live healthy, and deal with the rest as it comes up—or have some basic security measures down, and that’ll protect against most threats.

What’s the use case for a mobile bitcoin node? Archiving? I have an unused drive but already run a BTC node on an Intel NUC so I don’t understand the benefit in that case.

Anyone wanna work on a FROST BTC wallet?

This will be coming to the friendly enslaved EU country near you as well. In some form it is already in place for Banking with even lower limits.

Replying to Avatar PlebLab

https://streamable.com/l/if9zxs/mp4-mobile.mp4

🤙Introducing the NostrDev course.

In just under 8 hours, we'll guide you from being a novice to becoming a proficient Nostr developer, enabling you to create resilient, censorship-resistant decentralized networks.

🤙 Who is this course for?

• Anyone wants to start learning how to code on Nostr

• Anyone who is trying to learn to code

• Those looking to develop on freedom tech

• Digital privacy enthusiasts looking to expand their knowledge

• Anyone wants to build a Nostr Reddit

https://www.pleblab.com/nostrdevs

Which language is going to be used? Rust?

I hope the drain wasn’t there when they designed it. Not very effective at keeping intruders out.