Avatar
Heather_860
afb367080fffcd79ba47b20e36a8adf2030b01876c4eb23cfb2a0a879ad6d924
I abhor pernicious neo-Puritan ideology - - - - - I don't accept zaps. You can support me by posting a link to my YouTube: https://youtube.com/@wild_heather_860 or PeerTube: https://tube.xy-space.de/c/heather_860 channels :-) thanx

Women should marry when they want and you have exactly zero right to any opinion on what anyone else does with their life.

Define "boys" and define "sodomy" 😀 😀

It seems that someone has been lying to you about California laws 😀 😀

Or maybe you have a bizarre definition of "it's ok for...."

Did that young man take advantage of a completely hammered, extremely sexy, very rich woman, simply because he could?

I don't know. I wasn't there.

but it's just as likely a scenario as the reverse.

You start by saying that thinking about having sex with someone is "sexualizing them" (this is a basic thought crime) (also for clarification, is it necessary to say something? like if I tell someone "I'd love to fuck Hasselhoff" then I'm 'sexualizing' him, but if I only think it and keep those thoughts to myself I'm not?)

but then your third paragraph says "Bayside deliberately sexualized their characters" which is clearly a different meaning. Can you get more precise about what you mean here?

Is either one of these meanings negative? Is it a bad thing to do?

No wonder Gen Z is so neurotic and lonely. If they don't solve consent calculus problems correctly they'll be rapists.

(yes, fame, and money, and a dozen other things are also forms of power. but these idiots don't know that having power =/= abusing power)

do you think that "find someone sexually attractive" = "sexualize them" ?

"guys id like to remind yall I was raised to believe gay ppl were sinful, and I had a disgust reaction against gay people.

Luckily, I questioned my disgust response. I needed a concrete, clear harm in order to justify it.

If you don't operate like that, you're the kind of person who would have held horrible beliefs throughout history"

Aella

This ridiculous argument is very common.

The age of consent is not 18.

and in the few places where it is, there is literally no reason for setting that age.

and we are not talking about the legal age of motherhood

calling it "the horrors of motherhood" is fear-mongering bullshit

suppressing young adult sexuality doesn't benefit anyone.

Abstinence Only failed miserably

Is 36 year old David Hasselhoff sexual?

or am I sexualizing him by noticing that he's very attractive?

THE PEER-REVIEWED STUDY WE'VE BEEN WAITING FOR FOR 16 YEARS!

'Independence Therapy' Could Revolutionize Treatment for Child Anxiety

Pilot study encouraged parents to let their kids go Free-Range.

By Lenore https://reason.com/2024/06/21/independence-therapy-could-revolutionize-treatment-for-child-anxiety/

There will never be "a serious conversation about power dynamics in dating"

because "power dynamics" is total bullshit.

having power =/= abusing power

Creepy is a feeling.

I have no trouble at all respecting your feelings. But I also firmly believe that we as a society should hold this discussion on a *rational level* and use objective criteria.

You may be satisfied shouting your feelings on the internet. I am not.

Sexual attraction is a function of biology not of bureaucracy.

The Department of Motor Vehicles doesn't give you a license to be sexy.

If anyone actually believed this we'd never let anyone under 25 get a tattoo, join the army, or have children.

In the 1950s all the prudes claimed that Elvis Presley's gyrating hips on stage would cause the total moral collapse of civilization. (society did just fine)

But every generation has to have it's moralizing idiots screaming "SEX!! SEX!!! STOP ALL THE SEX!!!!" 😀😀😀

The Hippies were right.

Countless lives could have been saved. Trillions of dollars not wasted on senseless brutal incarceration. If we had listened to them 50 years ago.

The Neo-Puritans are trying to impose their sex-phobic bullshit on our society.

Stop them.