what makes you say that?

& to qualify, I (nvm) don't claim to be nvk (@`DETERMINISTIC OPTIMISM 🌞`)
thank you for the context
this is the reference:
"What did communists use for lighting before candles?"
"What?"
"Electricity"
🥁
🎶 "Power grids plus Bitcoin grace:
A tunable load in time and space!
From stranded watts to surplus power,
Optimal use, each second, each hour!" 🎵
https://nvm.io/suno/The%20Goldbug%20&%20the%20Goose%20(kazoocapella%201).mp4
https://nvm.io/suno/The%20Goldbug%20&%20the%20Goose%20(acapella%201).mp4
https://nvm.io/suno/The%20Goldbug%20&%20the%20Goose%20(swing%201).mp4
https://nvm.io/suno/The%20Goldbug%20&%20the%20Goose%20(rock%20opera%201).mp4
"How can Bitcoin balance grids, if it's worthless as you claim?"
https://suno.com/song/f5ebd120-5769-4999-bc06-1f9b98040b06
https://suno.com/song/a2a403dd-d398-4fef-a7d4-7d7533ab60e3
(never mind)
You said that, not me!
I was implying the overall corpus of code copilot was trained on is unlikely to be pristine enough for many, but gigo is more succinct.
A second point would have been about difficulties modeling the utility of "no signal" in a giant system of weighted averages.
A third point would have been that the field overall is still so nascent, nearly all current human opinions are likely to be very far off the mark of what will end up being relevant.



