Avatar
Lee
b0558b2d085010a6755ca42f707bf5cc536d00053b486119d6fe99c3c4cb11e3
AML compliance officer at a top 10 (US) bank. Send a note if you're a bitcoiner or a bitcoin company having AML issues with your bank. I am happy to help to the extent possible (as a personal endeavor... not/not as an officer of the bank). NO ALTCOINERS!

Entonces, muy amable, pana.

thanks I think 🤔

is that a gift for me?

pretty cool, regardless

Similar to "dusting" with btc from a sanctioned address, in a way...

Interested to see more answers to your hypothetical, Semisol.

This would be nice... though tbh I only understand 80% of what you just said I can point to a potential use-case with a ready made user base(s)... no need to wait for the adoption curve.

...Wondering how one might implement an 'internal nostr' for a company to replace the typical suite of Microsoft products (outlook, office, teams, etc.).

///skipping past all the general and specific requirements you might want to dump into Jira for your agile story... straight to a potential limiter (with silver lining)///

This might imply need to 'translate' items in & out to support external comms for business, etc. Or, could simply not translate at all in order to 'compartmentalize/sequester' the company nostr instance (to prevent spillage of any sort).

Banks, university researchers, healthcare, government... all endeavors that might consider inviting the Lost Boys Kiefer Sutherland character in the front door b/c they see advantage. (Give it some time and shake lightly, et voila! You've made bitcoiners.)

Happy birthday, Mr. Nakamoto, wherever you are!

thanks for sharing that.

I was unaware of the charges being dropped in a separate jurisdiction.

"I would never join a platform like Nostr if there's no way notes can be deleted"

"Why is that?"

"Depending what kind of platform it wants to be, if you have content creators like on tiktok or Instagram and someone disagrees with what they say, on these platforms people go as far as finding out addresses and phone numbers and post them in the comments. Mods remove such things. If notes can't be deleted, such information stands there forever. It's dangerous and a no go"

Had a talk this morning following yesterday's discussions about safety on Nostr. This reply is hard to argue with. If you're a nym it doesn't concern you much. If you create "social media content" like videos or images and people even know or recognize you, they might do the worst things for the worst reasons and there currently is no way to prevent or stop that.

Thinking about this a lot today. It's a fine line between censorship resistance and people feeling safe to use the protocol in a way they see fit.

If we want to always have a couple of Bitcoin anons, ignore what I said. If we want mass adoption it's a topic we need to address.

Can it be addressed tho? Yes, but we would need to shift from absolute censorship resistance to something compromised. Maybe some community based reporting mechanism that relays comply with in terms of deleting said notes. We would still not have a central instance but the community guiding such things.

Should it be done? Up for discussion. Especially now that we have a main focus on the outbox model and blastr, it would make it way harder to implement something like that as notes get spread out on many relays that all would need to comply to some mechanism like that. Almost impossible if it's not a standard part of the protocol.

I know this is not a popular topic. I'm interested what people think about it tho.

I'm here.

This is me.

I wouldn't say anything here that I wouldn't also say to a room full of strangers.

Sincere question here: did he (Ross) or did he not solicit (and pay for) a murder for hire? I'm not asking whether it was entrapment or whether there were extenuating circumstances. I just want to know whether the reporting was accurate about that element.

Need an audio warning on something like this in future. Maybe, "Warning! Do not play this audio more than once unless you want to throw up a little on your mouth."

I waiver between the long-form email with action items clearly marked, etc. andthe professional yet pithy equivalent of "let's discuss."

What's your preference?

What you say makes sense.

Do you also see the possibility that game theory will make 'zero KYC' options an attractive offering both for individual companies/merchants and for jurisdictions?

All one needs to do is to break the seal and recruit first followers like Sampson Maow (sp). is trying to do.