And that will impact the ability of private companies to manufacture and distribute. Sanctions can be placed on the few companies that make them. Furthermore restrictions will be placed on who can own them.
Once it is only the government that can secure the network we have given them total control. This is totally antithetical to the reason bitcoin was created
Keep it on the 1 thread. Let's start here
#[16]
Please just stop with the book PR. Do you understand my point here or not? Explain my position to show me you understand it.
You're missing my point. Not ending or attacking the protocol. The restrictions on ownership manufacturing and distribution or movement of the asic miners. I'm not sure how many times I can explain this.
Not sha256. PGP. Just read the details and how he printed encryption on a t shirt and crossed a border.
Come check out a regular nest. If you want nostr to rival Twitter spaces you need to support it!
#[0]
You are ignoring my question purposely now. It figures as Lowery himself does.
If you want to have a honest conversation, address my points. Do you even know about the PGP case? This is just pointless
Totally refute this. Once you agree that speech is violence you are allowing the government to dictate who can use it.
The 2nd amendment us being trampled on. I gwce to examples of restrictions(bump stops, barrel lemghts) niw think of hiw thus could be applied to the manufacturing, distribution amd ownership of the ASIC miners that secure the network.
You're helping enable thought crimes here. Once you accept that mathematical equations and code are anything more than speech, a whole new door is opened.
Tell me hiw this is in anyway different to the PGP case in the 90s
You have totally ignored my question with a word salad Lowery would be proud of.
Once again. Can you tell my why we should entertain this new attack vector when code is speech and nothing more?
Know your history and realise thus has been long settled by the Phil Zimmerman case and PGP.
I've had many a debate over this. Can you add something here?
#[3]
Didn't read this one. But I'm familiar with his game and happily recommend!
This guy does great work. Worth a follow!
#[0]
Cold card > trezor > ledger(without ledger live). Not familiar with the others
He just sounds confused. Time to put him out to pasture
Balance!

Wild to think about how dark the outlook would be without it
Drunk settings π should be able to toggle it on before you start a night out.


