Remember #bitcoin is only worth something if you hold it and use it directly. They can still print dollars for free to buy paper Bitcoin, whereas you have to work for dollars to buy it.
That also means they can use printed dollars to short it and play around with the market in other ways. People say 'oh they wouldn't do that because then they'd get rekt'. Well, they can, they have, and they will, because there's no consequences for doing so.
To a certain extent I agree as in life you get out what you put in. However, something about your post hasan feeling of giving up, on the idea of more adoption and of more upside.
That worries me as for Bitcoin to succeed we must still by definition be so early that there is still a huge amount of upside left, even for every 4 year cycle of this century. Otherwise what is there to first attract people?
And even worse, for adoption, if they will miss the new things that Bitcoin enables, then extremely few people will be using those things and they'll struggle to survive (business model, contributors, network effect etc).
Also I like you, but I only got in to Bitcoin in 2020. Since then I've been non stop buying, and even harder on every single dip (and with glee on the very lowest days). But although I've made good gains now, for a long time I wasn't even in the green. And your post is hard for me to swallow, getting in as apparently late as I did. I can't even imagine how I'd feel reading your post if I had just got in now, or even in 4 years' time. Probably like a fool who had been duped.
There can't be spite in Bitcoin, unless our success is so complete, our dominance over other forms of wealth so absolute, that we can just afford to say fuck you, and then even if that drives people away, still fuck em anyway because we're unassailable. But whilst that might be true even now from a tech and sovereignty perspective, it's certainly not true financially, and so it's way too early to be pulling up the proverbial ladder behind us.
And honestly, if you're feeling like that, you should maybe chill, enjoy your gains, take a moment to get a fresh perspective, and come back with a new angle. Because being harsh, what you said contributes nothing, and being kinder, it makes it sound like you need something to refresh your mind.
Just reading The Count of Monte Cristo, easily my favourite book of all time. I'd really recommend it if you haven't read it.
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7126.The_Count_of_Monte_Cristo
This is why I still buy Apple:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42260379
---
[ axoltl ]
I happen to have some first-hand knowledge around the subject! In 2014 someone did a talk[0] on disabling the camera on some older Macbooks. It was fairly trivial, basically just reflashing the firmware that controlled the LED. I worked on the security team at Apple at the time and in response to this I attempted to do the same for more modern Macbooks. I won't go into the results but the decision was made to re-architect how the LED is turned on. I was the security architect for the feature.
A custom PMIC for what's known as the forehead board was designed that has a voltage source that is ALWAYS on as long as the camera sensor has power at all. It also incorporates a hard (as in, tie-cells) lower limit for PWM duty cycle for the camera LED so you can't PWM an LED down to make it hard to see. (PWM is required because LED brightness is somewhat variable between runs, so they're calibrated to always have uniform brightness.)
On top of this the PMIC has a counter that enforces a minimum on-time for the LED voltage regulator. I believe it was configured to force the LED to stay on for 3 seconds.
This PMIC is powered from the system rail, and no system rail means no power to the main SoC/processor so it's impossible to cut the 3 seconds short by yoinking the power to the entire forehead board.
tl;dr On Macbooks made after 2014, no firmware is involved whatsoever to enforce that the LED comes on when frames could be captured, and no firmware is involved in enforcing the LED stay on for 3 seconds after a single frame is captured.
0: https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/usenixsecurit...
That is impressive
I agree with most of that, only with the exception that most colonialists were religious, and many acted in the name of religion (bringing religion to the savages).
Also mentioning fiat food is slightly irrelevant because it's not explicitly incompatible with religion.
But on the whole I take your point.
So what's it called?
Also just wondering what GUI are you using there for Ollama? Thanks
As the proud owner of a real Jag, I couldn't be more disappointed.
When I was 8 years old, my granddad whp was my hero had one of these, when they were brand new and the coolest thing ever. I always said I'd get one in honour of him, and 10 years ago, I did.



One ring to rule them all...
Coinkite is attacking open source btc devs again, after Foundation and Seedsigner now Btcclock with a cease and desist that blocked Djuri dev's github.
We need a decentralized github so that what happened to nostr:npub1k5f85zx0xdskyayqpfpc0zq6n7vwqjuuxugkayk72fgynp34cs3qfcvqg2 does not happen.
I always go against the grain, when all bitcoiners say a hardware wallet is good it is usually the opposite, Coinkite has proven to be a shitty company that uses closed and flawed secure elements and also takes advantage of other free software projects, as they used trezor code, but attacks others dishonestly.
I've seen a few people say this and I'm worried, what is insecure about the ColdCard mk4? And what's a good alternative?
100%, fuck patents, fuck intellectual property, fuck copyright.
You can't copy Bitcoin. You can copy other information, end of.
Well there is one way around that, which is to sycophantically to those handful of npubs in the hope of being noticed.
In all seriousness though, reading replies to those top npubs is how I discover all the smaller accounts to follow. So you're acting as a sort of social coordinator.
Also though there various lists, hasjtags, and discovery services. Not tp mention other app types.
17/24, I think I could've done better.
I'm going through the same at the moment, and we're going to the Netherlands for a month. So I'm preparing for maximum darkness, rain, and downsizing 😬
#gm #nostr from
Jessie (who is nearly 15!)

and Blue (11 but thinks he's a puppy)

Wow thanks! I had been meaning to start a Youtube channel for years, but I just couldn't work up the motivation. Now that I know there's these alternatives I'm much more excited to actually do it.
What the world desperately needs is a Nostr based alternative to YouTube!
Exactly, it didn't all work perfectly, it wasn't all instant, but all the people were real. And it felt like there was a real link between what happened online and what happened in the real world. You could actually meet a girl online *gasp*. And that's exactly what Nostr feels like, a link to the real world through the internet. Which is ironic because the accounts on here are just cryptographic keys, whereas fiat social media (sorry I know it's cringe to call everything fiat, but it really is fiat social media) feels so disconnected from the real world, even when people have their real identities on there!
That is insane. Can other similar planes do similar maneuvers?
The UK left the EU for just that reason. It's so frustrating to have your 'leaders' not representing you, and then whenever they get called out they just say 'oh well we would've done the right thing, but the nasty EU wouldn't let us do it'. So it's good to take away that excuse at least. Although of course they have infinite other excuses.




