Avatar
TheFreeQuaker
b39b8e83d9287fce3d258786dfcbd0043098f964d0d9e4fcaab5660c0e391257
A Quaker into decentralization, permaculture, simplicity, peace. Exploring the world one step at a time. Seeker of truth, separating facts from fiction. Always curious, often wandering. Here to learn, listen and grow. Opinions are works-in-progress. Will walk long distances for good conversation.
Replying to Avatar roya ୨୧

For me, this is a beautiful description of sin, or separation from God and that of God all around us.

nostr:note1h8n6yhnteyjkwxzalsdkasjd8s8xdjw6u9cew3gy62nmlap94vnstwr9un

True technological advancement doesn't merely change our world; it transforms our hearts and minds towards righteousness.

Replying to Avatar TheFreeQuaker

Great episode. I really enjoyed hearing nostr:npub1jfn4ghffz7uq7urllk6y4rle0yvz26800w4qfmn4dv0sr48rdz9qyzt047 discuss NVC (non-violent communication).

When my daughter was a toddler, we did an NVC course. I left with two strong feelings:

1) NVC is extremely important

2) Without inner transformation, NVC can be manipulative

Later, when I joined a Quaker meeting, I found folks who embodied NVC without sounding like it. They'd done the inner work. NVC was more than just a means to an end. A lot of listening and deep concern for speaking Truth to/with others in a compassionate way.

Thanks nostr:npub14kw5ygpl6fyqagh9cnrytyaqyacg46lzkq42vz7hk8txdk49kzxs04j7y0 !

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzptvaggsrl5jgp63wt3xxgkf6qfms3t479vp25c9a0vwkvmd2tvydqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqg8f9ysnf3uhvl96696nuyreqcnns6arefs6xaqe2ygz6wy5cz3tq5svyl9v

(One of my NVC classmates shared that their workplace implemented NVC training for all staff. Surprisingly, he described it as the most toxic environment he'd ever experienced, rife with passive-aggressiveness.

I've noticed a similar pattern when encountering NVC language from those deeply immersed in woke politics. No inner work. Just another way to get what you want.)

Great episode. I really enjoyed hearing nostr:npub1jfn4ghffz7uq7urllk6y4rle0yvz26800w4qfmn4dv0sr48rdz9qyzt047 discuss NVC (non-violent communication).

When my daughter was a toddler, we did an NVC course. I left with two strong feelings:

1) NVC is extremely important

2) Without inner transformation, NVC can be manipulative

Later, when I joined a Quaker meeting, I found folks who embodied NVC without sounding like it. They'd done the inner work. NVC was more than just a means to an end. A lot of listening and deep concern for speaking Truth to/with others in a compassionate way.

Thanks nostr:npub14kw5ygpl6fyqagh9cnrytyaqyacg46lzkq42vz7hk8txdk49kzxs04j7y0 !

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzptvaggsrl5jgp63wt3xxgkf6qfms3t479vp25c9a0vwkvmd2tvydqywhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68ytnzd96xxmmfdejhytnnda3kjctv9uq3xamnwvaz7tm0venxx6rpd9hzuur4vghsqg8f9ysnf3uhvl96696nuyreqcnns6arefs6xaqe2ygz6wy5cz3tq5svyl9v

Replying to Avatar gladstein

Here's my profile for Reason on Nostr and why it could very well change the world

Pasting a few paragraphs here, you can find the rest at the link

Feel free to spread far and wide 😉

*************

Can Nostr Make Twitter's Dreams Come True?

Twitter's founder says Nostr is “100 percent what we wanted”—an open, ownerless network

Alex Gladstein | 8.13.2024

Virtually everyone agrees that social media is broken. On Facebook, X, Instagram, and TikTok, people fear out-of-control algorithms, fake news, state actor censorship, and propaganda. Google and Meta collect vast troves of personal information on their users and receive hundreds of thousands of requests every year from governments around the world to access that data. YouTube has become arguably "the most powerful media platform in the history of humanity," yet its algorithm is an ever-changing black box to the creators that populate the platform with videos. During the pandemic, federal officials were in contact with every major social media platform, coercing them to remove content.

The problem is centralized control. We can't trust companies to run our primary communications infrastructure. Government regulation only makes matters worse because it creates new legal barriers to entering the industry, which protects incumbent players and stifles innovation.

What if there were an alternative, not owned by Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, or the Chinese Communist Party? What if there were a way to control your own data to prevent companies from harvesting and monetizing it? What if you had granular control over what you see in your feed, with the freedom to choose your own algorithms? What if you owned your identity, which could be accessed seamlessly across different clients? That way, if you disapprove of the changes that Elon Musk brought to X, instead of closing your account you could take your handle and followers elsewhere.

That alternative exists. It's called "Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays"—or Nostr.

The Decentralized Solution

Invented by a pseudonymous programmer and overwhelmingly funded by grants from non-profit foundations, this decentralized, free, and open-source protocol has been quietly evolving for the past three years. Like bitcoin, Nostr is a community-run digital network highly resistant to censorship and corruption. It has 40,000 weekly active users and a growing ecosystem of clients and applications ranging from social media to long-form publishing to payments.

Nostr is only necessary because our existing internet is so broken.

Fifteen years ago, social media seemed destined to decentralize the world and give power back to the people. In 2009, we watched as Arab Spring activists used Twitter and Facebook to organize, coordinate, and help topple several long-standing dictatorships. The promise was that these new social platforms, designed by Silicon Valley entrepreneurs, could help liberate the masses.

It was intoxicating—but turned out to be a mirage. The Arab revolutions stalled out when brutal military regimes cracked down. These platforms became tools for spying and censoring their users. X and Facebook have helped journalists and human rights activists reach bigger audiences, but they haven't fulfilled their revolutionary promise.

Jack Dorsey's Shift from Bluesky to Nostr

This was a major theme at the 2024 Oslo Freedom Forum, which is put on annually by the Human Rights Foundation, where I serve as chief strategy officer. At this conference for democracy and human rights, Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey told the audience that the problem was, actually, guys like him: The very fact that Twitter, now X, has a CEO makes it a single point of failure. Governments routinely pressured Dorsey to censor content; once the company's offices in India were raided. Dorsey says that under the new Musk regime X complies with whatever governments want.

The X network is proprietary. Known as a "silo," this construct traps a user's identity, followers, and data. X also has the power to evict anyone from the platform and delete what they've written. Several years ago, when he was still running the company, Dorsey became convinced that Twitter should become an application instead, where users could post content to an open, ownerless network. This would make it similar to how bitcoin works, where you use an application called a wallet to interact with the network, but the network itself is neutral and open.

Building a non-proprietary architecture was Dorsey's original vision for Twitter, but over time the need to maximize revenue to build a business and serve shareholders undermined that goal.

Nevertheless, in 2021, Dorsey encouraged the creation of Bluesky—an initiative bootstrapped in-house to create that open neutral base layer. But after Musk bought the company, the managers of Bluesky were afraid they would run out of money and started raising funds from venture capitalists, which undermined the vision of building an open platform. Dorsey grew disenchanted and left the Bluesky board.

At the conference in Oslo, Dorsey explained what happened next:

I asked a question: What open source initiatives should I be funding that would be helpful to the public internet? And people kept tweeting at me that I should be looking at Nostr. I found the GitHub that described it and it was 100 percent what we wanted from Bluesky, but it wasn't developed from a company. It was completely independent. Its paper diagnosed every single problem we saw and had. But did it in a grassroots and dead simple way, that felt like the early Twitter where any developer could get on and really feel it.

Escaping the 'Golden Prisons'

Nostr was created in 2020 by the pseudonymous Brazilian programmer fiatjaf, who describes it as "the simplest open protocol that is able to create a censorship-resistant global 'social' network once and for all."

Though nobody is in charge, Nostr works as promised and is thriving. "It is the solution we've all been looking for," says Miljan Braticevic, founder of Primal, one of the two dozen plus clients now available for the Nostr protocol. "Nostr is not a Twitter competitor or a Mastodon competitor. This is the biggest misconception at the moment. That's just the tip of the iceberg. Nostr is nothing less than the foundation for the new internet. Meaning almost every conceivable app we have today will be built on Nostr."

Braticevic's prediction is echoed by at least a dozen other prominent developers. Martti Malmi, the first coder to work on bitcoin alongside Satoshi Nakamoto, is now a Nostr developer. In a recent talk, he said he had started to work on similar ideas around decentralized identity in 2019, only to come close to giving up. But then he found fiatjaf's invention, which he called a "godsend."

"Bitcoin is freedom of money, and Nostr is freedom of everything else," Malmi said. "I was there" in the earliest days of bitcoin, "and Nostr is even more intense."

For something that could be world-changing, Nostr is quite simple. To join, you sign up with a mobile or desktop client, which helps you to create a public and private key pair. The public key (or "npub") is used as your identifier, and you share it with clients and other users so that people can find your posts or pay you for your content. The private key ("nsec") is hidden by the user, stored safely (just like a bitcoin seed phrase), and is your way to log in to different services. Unlike platforms like X or Facebook, no other information is required to set up and use Nostr.

This gives users a powerful range of sovereignty. You can use a client, for example, that has strong hate speech controls. Or you can choose one that doesn't have any at all. You can use a client with aggressive algorithms, just like the ones X uses today. Or you can use one without any algorithm at all. Today, when you log in to an app like Primal, you can sort your feed by what's the latest, by what's most popular, by what's most zapped, or by customized keywords. It's up to you.

Last month, the macroeconomist Lyn Alden, author of one of the best books on bitcoin, published a long essay about Nostr's potential:

[Nostr] is a simple set of foundational building blocks that, if widely adopted, could gradually reshape "the Web" as we know it. Instead of a separate set of siloed social ecosystems, we could gravitate toward a more interoperable set of ecosystems, with more of the power dispersed to the content creators and to the audience, and away from the middlemen corporations.

The Nostr network is constructed like a spider web that can morph and regenerate, making it almost impossible to censor. When you set up a client on Nostr (perhaps, Primal or Damus on iOS; Amethyst on Android; or Coracle on the web), you choose from a variety of relays to connect to. This architecture ensures no single point of failure: If you are connected to seven or eight relays, and half of them choose to censor posts, your feed remains censorship-free, as your app will display the net sum of everything broadcast from each relay. If the Chinese government decides to attack your relays—as it did in 2023 when Damus launched on the Hong Kong and mainland app store—then more can be spun up. "The enemy," said Damus creator Will Casarin, "is too numerous."

Prominent bitcoin developer and educator Gigi—who switched to Nostr and deleted his X account—says that what helped it become so resilient is that it has zero exit cost. If the Chinese Communist Party bans YouTube, its domestic users lose everything. There's no way to get back their profiles and followers. The same is true if a user voluntarily closes an account.

Gigi calls these corporate silos "golden prisons" with no escape. Nostr's spider-like architecture makes escaping easy. If one client goes down, or you fail to connect to one relay, you just find another client or connect to another relay. You keep your posts, photos, preferences, contacts, and even algorithms of choice. If you use X, you are an X creator. But if you use Primal, you aren't a Primal creator, you are a Nostr creator.

https://reason.com/2024/08/13/can-nostr-make-twitters-dreams-come-true/

Finally, an article to share with non-nostr friends.

nostr:note1xgg3ltnfapp05v37s7dx4z23hjgxnqfudycatl0q0yrdkf5ty6fsvvjxja

Technology that exploits is darkness. Seek tools that bring light.

"We need to find God, and he cannot be found in noise and restlessness. God is the friend of silence."

~ Thomas R. Kelly, #Quaker

Community is where we practice being human.

Let your life speak louder than your words.

God speaks in whispers. Learn to listen.

Simplicity isn't about having less, but appreciating more.

Replying to Avatar Trey Walsh

Had a long conversation with my wife about this this morning.

X has been a life suck for me recently. So, I’m deleting it off my phone. I’ve felt the need to be connected to it to get out more diverse content and messaging around Bitcoin. But it’s severely impacting my mental health.

My next step is to delete my personal X account and take a step back from engaging with the community there. We’ll still have nostr:npub1fpcd25q2zg09rp65fglxuhp0acws5qlphpg88un7mdcskygdvgyqfv4sld account everywhere. I used to tell myself it’s letting Elon’s echo-chamber win if I take a step back, that I want people to see a different perspective with my account being visible there. But none of it fucking matters, nor is worth the negative impact it’s having on my mental health. It’s gotten pretty bad recently.

Thankfully nostr, whether it’s size, lack of rage algorithm, etc doesn’t make me feel that way at all. And also, I’ll have more time and attention to devote to real interactions, working on a nonprofit idea for bitcoin publishing, expanding more pods and supporting projects/communities with nostr:npub18jgxqshg38cgzcv43zvqhnc7hjn223psy2kkmkpqt2azd9thyy4sxjc5gt and more.

Set boundaries, live your life, you are in control 💜 nostr:note1eqxg3suq6qwjpzzd59rgsypyuyywa0ct7lrnnl4v30ctnyzep7vsqvutum

After leaving Twitter a couple years ago, I feel better and more informed. Even on nostr, I limit my time, but the experience is noticeably different. All in all, you really need to be intentional about social media and clear about your objectives. Otherwise, it swallows you whole.

I'm really impressed with the @nostrudel web app. I switch between Primal, Iris, Coracle, and noStrudel in a single night, with noStrudel quickly becoming my go to.

In the silence, we find our loudest truths.

9 Core Quaker Beliefs by Arthur Larrabee

1. There is a living, dynamic spiritual presence (God) that is both within us and outside of us.

2. There is that of God (the divine) in everyone. All life is sacred and interconnected.

3. Each person can directly experience God without intermediaries.

4. Our understanding of God grows in community. Coming together brings diverse experiences of the divine.

5. The Bible is an important spiritual resource. The life and teachings of Jesus are relevant today.

6. God's revelation continues beyond the Bible. God reveals truth to people in all times.

7. Truth comes from many sources. Diverse spiritual truths enrich our experience.

8. Inward experience of God leads to outward expressions of faithful living, witness and action.

9. Modeling God's presence through our lives is more important than espousing beliefs. "Let your life speak."

#Quaker

https://youtu.be/3H08cyXVYDw

The Apostles' Creed, a common statement of belief for Christians, leaps from "born of the virgin Mary" to "suffered under Pontius Pilate," skipping Jesus' entire ministry. I've often wondered why people sidestep the Sermon on the Mount with elaborate justifications to avoid its demands. Too many see it as Faith OR Works. For me, it's BOTH.

I've been in this place for a few years now. I quietly let people know I'm interested in Bitcoin. If they're curious, they ask for more information. I don't try to convert anyone. Instead, I listen more than I talk and find common ground. When necessary, I gently correct misconceptions. But most of my life isn't spent discussing it.