Lightning network can do milli-sats... Just saying 😅
Quite literally, Bitcoin treasuries are the next instance of shitcoins
(after altcoins, ICOs, DeFi, NFTs and memecoins)
OUT FUCKING RAGEOUS!
The FT markets columnist, Katie Martin, on bitcoin.
Martin has covered bitcoin for 7 + years at the FT and still, openly, does not get it.
This is 100% real, not ai, (except the gag at the end).
https://blossom.primal.net/2e4600e461b22a6b7c08f563a2f2939922764a75492f21f52fa43843b7441aed.mov
I cut together her comments from a Strategy video below.
Video:
I didn't realize how much I missed the FUD 😅 this is funny
Again, would it not be more useful to start reviewing and contributing to knots then, instead of yelling at strangers on the internet?
Would it not be more useful to start reviewing and contributing to knots then, instead of posting empty rhetoric to socials?
Creating your own boating accident, smart move 😜
Would an increase of the utxo set eat up more of that precious RAM of yours 🤔?
I'm betting on the booger tissue 😂
On the way back from visiting Zelensky, journalists unexpectedly entered the cabin. What are Merz and Macron trying to hide? Looks like a little spoon and a bag with a white substance. The three look like they have been caught doing something wrong. Look very closely...
🧐🤔
https://blossom.primal.net/5b8626556cae111da091696e57e72fd63565233c3be03d6eb6128f697499562a.mp4
Also looks like just a snotty tissue? Or is that not conspiratorial enough?
Bitcoin is indeed technically just a database (multiple actually: it uses LevelDB and SQLite), but that database is also at the heart of an emerging global monetary system.
Todd refused to acknowledge that 2nd part (which is crucial context) and Mechanic almost exclusively spewed empty rhetoric and dogma. It was very disappointing tbh
But I guess this is what "rough consensus" looks like 😅
#gm and a happy mother's day to all the moms out there 💐
I'll stick to core v28 until I better understand the repercussions of v29 and changing the OP_RETURN limit myself, but it's certainly not as straightforward as many people want to make it seem
So far Knots, to me at least, appears to be the worst choice. And most people promoting Knots have no clue about software security
That mean you trust your Bitcoin to a centralized one-man-show software project. A much safer and saner option would be to simply not upgrade to core v29 and stick to v28
Regardless of one's stance on the issue, I don't think it's a good idea to trust my node, vote and money to a hypercentralized software project like Knots. There's 1 person who makes every single decision and just a single pair of eyeballs looking at code before pushing commits directly to main. There's currently a diff of >4000 commits between Core and Knots, that's a big question mark on software security. I don't think anyone who's really serious about software security will run Knots in production tbh
And imagine what'd happen if Luke had to consider other people's opinions about his implementation (which is mostly core code anyway) 😅
That's not what he said though, so it's a bit of a strawman argument you're making. Why? 🤔
We're all created from fetal tissue and every single cell in our body (with the exception of red blood cells) has billions of DNA fragments, so what exactly is the problem here?
And half of all remaining bitcoin will be mined in the next 4 years. The second half will be mined in the ~110 years after that