If you don't wanna hang out with Epstein, stop going to his island.

wut?

😂😂😂

I don't understand the intense reaction to market fluctuations from people whose mantra is "never sell your ₿itcoin." More about attention than ₿itcoin. Never trust. Verify.

Spot on. I wish that more people understood the significance of this deep corruption.

Mine called me Diane and pinched me on the ass.

😂

Eres tu?

What are we looking at here?

😴😴😴

😴😴😴

₿itcoin IS the bus.

The allure of Bitcoin has drawn a diverse array of individuals into its orbit. Sometimes I wonder if the most visible proponents of Bitcoin are truly invested in its core ethos, or are they merely capitalizing on the infrastructure it has spawned? It seems that the individuals most readily encountered, those actively engaged in promoting and building the Bitcoin ecosystem, are primarily compensated in the very fiat currency that Bitcoin purports to displace. This observation raises a fundamental paradox: are these individuals genuine believers in Bitcoin's potential, or are they simply leveraging its popularity for lucrative, albeit conventional, employment? Are their roles, in essence, just another form of "fiat job," a means to an end rather than a testament to unwavering conviction?

This line of inquiry is not born of cynicism, but rather a desire to understand the complex dynamics of a nascent financial frontier and some really good weed. The reality is that the Bitcoin ecosystem, like any emerging industry, necessitates a robust infrastructure. Mining operations, exchange platforms, wallet providers, and software developers are all vital components, and their services demand compensation. Consequently, the individuals who build and maintain these services are often paid in traditional fiat currencies. This is not inherently problematic; operational expenses, salaries, and the very necessities of life require a medium of exchange readily accepted within the existing financial framework.

However, this reliance on fiat raises pertinent questions about the motivations of those within the Bitcoin space. While many may hold Bitcoin as a long-term investment or harbor a genuine belief in its transformative potential, their primary income source is often derived from providing services to the ecosystem, not from the direct appreciation of Bitcoin itself. This creates a dichotomy: a decentralized dream being built with the tools of a centralized system.

The prevalence of "fiat jobs" within the Bitcoin sphere is a reflection of the current transitional phase. Fiat remains the dominant global currency, and until Bitcoin achieves widespread adoption, it will continue to play a crucial role in facilitating transactions and sustaining the ecosystem. The growth of the Bitcoin infrastructure is, in itself, a necessary step towards broader acceptance, even if the builders are primarily compensated in fiat.

Ultimately, the Bitcoin ecosystem is a complex tapestry woven from diverse threads. It comprises ideological believers, financial speculators, and service providers, each with their own motivations and perspectives. While the ideal of a purely Bitcoin-based economy may be the ultimate goal for some, the journey towards that future is inevitably intertwined with the realities of the present. The question of whether Bitcoin professionals are truly invested in the currency itself is less a matter of black and white, and more a nuanced exploration of the intricate relationship between innovation and pragmatism. Don't trust, verify.

Freedom of choice. People choosing to get rekt with shitcoins at this particular time. Smart money realizing the value of ₿itcoin was always going to happen.

Oh the irony.

Word

California, New York, Nevada? Arguably the top 3 in the union when it comes to corruption. Go figure. Children of the swamp.

It's the decimal and my OCD.

5.56

Reminds me of Aussie break dancing.