Ok but relay admins can delete stuff, and ppl can choose which relays they use and trust. Relay admins shouldn’t have special authority to remove content that users don’t.
Not necessarily. Someone could choose to just run their own relay and restrict access to it for example.
Yes, definitely. I know ppl say everything on the internet is there forever, but that’s not true at all, fedi is a good example of that.
I meant specifically about blocking each other like crazy. A ton of lemmy instances defed each other over nothing, it’s ridiculous.
Not at all, that’s not what decentralised means or implies, and that violates the law in the EU so say goodbye to EU relays.
Ideally relay admins would be upfront with their policies so you could make a decision about this. But they shouldn’t have special authority, it should still be possible to request a delete esp considering the laws in some countries which require it.
I’m listening nostr:npub1sg6plzptd64u62a878hep2kev88swjh3tw00gjsfl8f237lmu63q0uf63m
I believe delete is necessary… for various reasons. People can & will change views over time. Views & ideas which they shouldn’t be punished for cause society changes & adapts over time. Culture is evolving, it’s fluid.
Change my mind.
He’s right that you can’t deny having said something on nostr because it’s verifiable and signed. But that isn’t the only issue. Like the GDPR regulations for example.
Not to mention that many countries have laws regarding allowable speech, and if they were to order someone to take down a post and they literally can’t, it could turn out much worse for them. The entire world isn’t the US Jack, far from it.
Someone can keep them and say “you said this” because they’re signed, but that doesn’t mean relay admins should be the only ones that can delete them.
It’s sold already ground?
Notes literally aren’t permanent, relay admins can delete them, making them “permanent” is a fantasy. Jack needs to snap back into reality.