Lol telling the truth, you mean?

nostr:nprofile1qqsxc56ajk5xtxerf4dqspgrfa0s5elrcr80lnz9nasldq87j3zzf0cc5h4hk enjoying your book "The big print"! I would like to point out that the text regarding the graph " Dan Oliver, Myrmikan Capital, “Weimar Hyperinflation: Gold Performance and Gold Volatility" is inaccurate. It says "The second, more volatile line shows the monthly price of gold measured against Weimar marks." It is not the price of gold, but rather its derivitive, the change in the price of gold.

NATO is defensive in name only (DINO lol). In reality they have clearly been the aggressor in many, many cases. Never on the defensive side, not a single time. Please provide an example if I am wrong. Clearly Ukraine isnt, because they are not in NATO. NATO needs an enemy to keep feeding itself, so they make up enemies. Its one big money laundering scheme and control mechanism. Of course Zelensky doesn't want the war to end, because then there are supposed to be elections and he can't send his wife out shopping anymore from American/EU tax payers money. This war can only be ended through diplomacy: keep the borders more or less at the current front lines.

With that being said, invading was morally wrong.

For some laws there is some overlap with my moral values, indeed. The destruction that comes with the invasion is immoral. Any occupation is immoral, regardless who the occupator is. Also, this war is completely taken out of context by most western media. Zelensky/NATO/America/the military industrial complex want this war more than Russia. Despite all this, I agree the invasion is immoral.

Under whose law anyway?

Illegal vs legal does not define the border between moral and immoral.

She is a he and actually his father

You misspelled husband/father

I will give it a go then

Does it have vimium plugin though?

Foot, because it's lightweight

Not really. One of the parties needs to be online

This is already the case in Holland

Genuine question: do you dispute Jews being targeted? Is it specifically about the gas chambers? Are the numbers inflated? What's the definition of holocaust and what part(s)/of that definition didn't happen?

Complete garbage. Don't waste your time

Bitcoin is the singularity

The monetary premium will go to zero. The price will solely consist of the utility value. Value given by applications such as jewelry, tooth fillings, conductive wires, gold plated toilets, etc.

Wen?

Hitler was apparently very friendly to pet dogs as well

Nothing, but it completely lost its meaning since everything slightly to the right of full blown communism is called far right these days.

"far right'

OK, let's run with the assumption that the earth is not similar to all observable other bodies. What shape do you propose and why? Do you dispute being able to fly around the world in latidunal direction? There are many combinations of flights that cover this whole direction. So, that would rule out a disk like shape, leaving something like a cylinder. Or what other topology do you propose?

All bodies adhere to the same physical laws. It would be an anamoly if the Earth would not be spherical. Also, these same basic physical laws do an excellent job in describing trajectories of missiles, planes, other celestial bodies, etc, under the assumption that the earth is a sphere. Third, if the earth is actually spherical, the relative big diameter would make it look locally as a level plane to the human eye. I haven't heard a single good argument why it would not be spherical, but I am very open to alternatives and what the actual shape then should be and why...

Lol what geometrical shape do you suggest then? A disk like shape?

We can establish that all the visible celestial shapes are 'round'. Let's just stick to the sun and moon, because they can be seen with the naked eye. What would be the odds that, assuming the earth is no exception and behaves exactly like those in terms of shape, they all coincidentally face the earth with their flat side of the disk, at all times?

Moreover, at least locally you can personally confirm that the proposed maps, where the earth is round, are correct. This holds up for all people. Since there is a big overlap of all people's local maps, we can conclude for the inhabited world that the maps are correct. That would leave little room for other geometrical shapes than a sphere like object

I really try to like my family members, but its hard

I have lost nearly all my family and friends. Worth it

Bayesian updating

Try zapstore