Avatar
Momo
be41636e3e6d2fe99e065200dc8a9034f9128064fdcd39b75a6983cae55c4909
The Host of Round the Fire with Momo šŸ§”šŸ’œšŸ„©

ā€œPrice is the ultimate filter,ā€ they say — and they’re right.

So why not raise the bar further? Force them to pay miners out-of-band, making their activity even more expensive.

Just caught up with all the notes posted since I last scrolled through my feed.

I’m not full of rage, I’m not full of hatred, I’m not triggered.

GN, fam!

How do you show love to a woman? You cook for her.

#foodstr

If I follow some so-called maxis on X, and over time they turn into spammers, filling up blocks with their dick pics, X won’t even show me their new content once they reveal their true colors—because the algorithm assumes I’m not interested in pro-dick-pic content. So they stay on my following list without me realizing it. That’s unfortunate.

On Nostr, though, if I follow someone and they later reveal their true colors, I see their posts in the order they’re relayed to me. I notice the change—and I can unfollow them right away.

GM!

Let’s go get some steak for breakfast.

Replying to Avatar Bitcoin FilmFest

Big thanks to nostr:nprofile1qqsq73wtu43r28rjz96zlcpvc0n0j8tv7kesdpeupulflsx9wrfnw8qpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejz7qgkwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezumn9wshsgf43kt for this iconic meme from 2023! Gonna miss you this year 🧔

By the way, drop a comment:

āš”ļø Were you with us back then?

āš”ļø Coming again / first time?

#BFF25 | Warsaw, Poland | May 22-25

It would be great if Sparrow added some public Bitcoin Knots nodes. This would give users who don’t run their own node the option to connect through public Bitcoin Knots nodes.

@craigraw

Yesterday, some friends told me about malicious acid tabs circulating that are deliberately designed to block your receptors and prevent any psychedelic experience.

Honestly, a bad trip scares me less than that does!

#psychedelics

🚨 Live Tomorrow at 17:00 CEST! 🚨

I'm sitting down with writer & Bitcoiner, nostr:nprofile1qyf8wumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetsv9njuetnqythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwv46kzmnrv5hxuet5qqsw756zdga5pmx5rqtff0zqjqpvznehagd72zqgs202phzy06vgs5gwchyuh , to explore storytelling in the Bitcoin era, Nostr, and sci-fi.

šŸ”„ Don’t miss it!

šŸ“ŗ https://www.youtube.com/live/ENYK0ZcK6fo

We're gonna go live on nostr:nprofile1qy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uq3zamnwvaz7tmwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qqsv73dxhgfk8tt76gf6q788zrfyz9dwwgwfk3aar6l5gk82a76v9fgfngn5a too. The link will be posted when we are live!

Bit it increases the cost of running a node for a node-runner who wants to have an archival node.

@Sjors_Provoost is one of the best educators in the Bitcoin space. While I strongly disagree with some of his points in this OP_RETURN episode (see my last 2–3 rant notes for that), it’s still a highly insightful listen—like every episode of Bitcoin Explained.

https://fountain.fm/episode/EyMpDXlQIL1W51z5y566

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqpxquqzq6uxmgfua3wpvf8q29lajal3ew4f23uy8qt8sz7ttpf3ex7rcyuw4v48qe

ā€œPeople can spam the blockchain anyway!ā€

Sure—but then what’s your objection to making it more expensive? If spammers have to pay miners out of band to get their junk included, wouldn’t it work as a deterrent?

Just curious—can you still embed non-transactional data in a fake public key that pretends to be part of a multi-sig, but is actually, say, the Bitcoin whitepaper?

If that’s still possible and it bloats the UTXO set, why open the OP_RETURN floodgate that invites even more spam onto the blockchain?

If you say cost isn’t an issue for projects like Citrea, then even Bitcoin’s ultimate filter—fees—won’t effectively limit their transactions. They can simply pay a miner to include their non-standard TXs with oversized OP_RETURN data.

But cost in fact is a filter, and the more expensive the spam, the more efficient the filter.