lets play a game

guess the usd bitcoin price exactly a month from now

sep 26th 2025 - 0414 UTC

closest guess will be zapped 5555 sats

only guesses made within the next 24 hours qualify

(if i think you are a bot you are disqualified)

This is why #nostr is so important. nostr:note1xedvcaed908rjt2t3cay5f80k0m6mq63mmdy5yw955rk9j326kgqt9u6w8

free ross ⏳

With a scarce asset like Bitcoin, I don't want to share anything. Orange Pill is from the spooks 😁 I'm probably paranoid... 🫣

Stay humble, stack Sats 🫂

😈demonic fucks

Lightweight, baby!

Ok. I admit it. In parts I train lighter these days because with age comes wisdom and I don't need to add any injuries to the list. But one major contributor is also that you just can't squat really heavy and assure at the same time that your family doesn't wake up due to the noise when you're training in the basement 😁🏋‍♂️

I promised, if #Bitcoin dumps to $60,000 I will give $10,000 BTC to 5 people

So as promised I will be giving away $10,000 to 5 person today.

Rules: like, retweet, follow me with A

* If you're not following, you will be disqualified.

Proof will be posted in 24 hours

Doing this for my community #btc #eth

you are misunderstanding me, we are talking about the software repository where bitcoin development runs.

The software repository is github which belongs to Microsoft, Microsoft can cancel the repository whenever it wants, Microsoft can provide the ips of the developers to the authorities, etc.

The code published at a given time, yes, but not its future development.

There is no point in bitcoin being censorship-resistant and distributed if the code is not.

- they can censor the repository because it is in a centralized service.

- They can censor, coerce, imprison and kill developers because many are not anonymous and use a centralized service.

The code is as important as the executable.

Make the code also uncensorable and distributed.

FYI (with reference to #Durov case and beyond):

In France, the use and provision of #cryptographic tools and services are indeed subject to regulation. The relevant legal framework is primarily governed by the “Code de la défense” and the “Code monétaire et financier”.

Under French law, certain cryptographic tools are classified as "dual-use" items, meaning they have both civilian and military applications. This classification stems from historical concerns over national security and the use of strong encryption in military communications.

The importation, exportation, and provision of cryptographic services in France often require prior authorization from the French authorities. Specifically, the use of cryptography for securing communications and data may require either a declaration or an authorization depending on the strength and purpose of the encryption. This is governed by the “Agence nationale de la sécurité des systèmes d'information” (ANSSI), the French National Cybersecurity Agency.

The use of cryptographic systems is regulated under the 1996 decree (modified in 2007) which distinguishes between cryptographic tools that require a simple declaration and those that require prior authorization. For instance:

- #declaration: required for cryptographic tools with basic security measures, such as SSL/TLS for secure website communications;

- #authorization: required for more advanced or military-grade cryptographic tools, where the encryption strength and the potential impact on national security are higher.

French regulations on cryptography are linked to the broader European Union framework on dual-use goods, which includes cryptographic technologies. Specifically, the European Dual-Use Regulation (2021/821), which is a part of the EU’s export control regime, governs the trade of dual-use items, including encryption tools, that can be used for both civilian and military purposes.