bf
Gabe
bf8218878848340ae670c0ac9faf2941e2eaa3b0b23f230be33546c1ea49aa29

Biden pardoned a bunch of non-violent offenders today… and Ross wasn’t one of them?

#freeross

Workout is a workout. Doesn’t do you any good to get wet in the rain and get sick.

But sometimes working out in the rain is needed. A good balance.

My company just told everyone that if they spoke positively about the guy who killed the UnitedHealth CEO, including on social media, we’d get fired.

Opinion on the killing aside, gross.

#asknostr for a new job

Doing my absolute smallest bit to make sure DC doesn’t forget in the next few weeks.

#freeross

Hunter got pardoned before Ross

Replying to Avatar Guy Swann

It’s simpler than it might seem:

When you normally buy stock, you do so at today’s price, then you could sell it at tomorrow’s price right? You make or lose based on the difference.

A short, or a bet that it will fall, makes money because it’s actually an agreement to BUY it tomorrow, and a promise to sell it at today’s price. So if today’s price is $90 and tomorrow it’s $85, someone just agreed to buy at $90 what you can now buy for $85 (pocket the $5).

Now a typical option contract is a super exaggerated version of that. In the simple example above, you need $85 in order to make $5. And you could be on the hook for $90 or more. So what if you said, “let’s make that short bet, but I only want to put up $5 for the $90 price, so if it falls more than that $5, I get auto closed out of the trade and lose everything, but this way I can make that same $5 by only betting $5” - ie. He gets like 16X exaggerated gains or losses.

So in this case you do the same thing, but have a limit to the option that it can’t hit because you are betting on way more shares than you actually have the money for. So if you have that same $85 to bet in total, you could make $85 (or double your money) if it simply goes up to $90 (obviously assuming you bet that it goes up, a “call”). However you lose ALL of your $85 if it merely falls back down to $80.

This is how someone can bet $10 million on a “long” (i bet its gonna go up), at $97K, but then lose EVERYTHING if it just falls back down to $95K, because they thought they could MAKE $10 million if it only went up to $99K instead.

This is pretty simplified, but the gist of the idea.

TL;DR It’s basically just a hyper leveraged contract with very strict limits on what the price can do and how much time things have to happen in, meaning both your gains and your losses are insanely exaggerated. So you mostly either get rich, or get rekt.

Im confused, if they long don’t they have the right to exercise the contract? If they aren’t in the money, they wouldn’t exercise it and would just lose the premium. Is this saying this degen paid a premium of 92 BTC???

Hasn’t he called food like this poison? So eating a little poison every now and then is ok?

I think I’ve realized why it seems like American liberals in my life are struggling so much with the outcome of the election.

I think the majority of people in the US are living under the presumption that their lives are static with the occasional blip of randomness.

In reality we are living in a massive experiment of existence with constant change.

And I believe that most people lack the ability to sit down and think about that.

Im not sure what this means, but probably true in a variety of settings