Avatar
hazeycode
bfbd26dc75540c5ee8be08f0ffaf2191a90c63e37ce066412d25ccfa5104e730

I’ll go all in on an effort that is all in… open from the hardware up... no reliance on propriety firmware blobs. All these projects just change the security model a bit. They are not truly open source platforms.

But “all the assumptions are known” is too strong an assertion for me. How could you ever know?

Regardless of what OS you put on your phone. Everything is back-doored at the hardware and firmware level.

We need truly open source mobile hardware and firmware. People don’t understand that even raspberry pis aren’t really open source, again using closed source firmware blobs.

“Surprisingly, the deGoogled phone's first connection is to google.com. According to Google, the host android.clients.google.com serves the Google Play Store for periodical device registration, location, search for apps and many other functions. This is strange because we have a deGoogled phone without the Google Play Store. Later we found out that this request originates from microG, an open source re-implementation of Google's proprietary core libraries and applications.

Then it connects to connectivity.ecloud.global which, according to /e/OS, replaces Android's Google server connectivity check connectivitycheck.gstatic.com.

He has a lot of blind spots. But he’s human and coming from the right place at least. Shame he’s been trapped into perpetually arguing the same narrative topics. I think he has a lot to offer given his domain of expertise.

Unfortunately hardware and firmware is not.

PWAs aren’t the answer. An truly open, permission-less mobile platform is. It’s been attempted before but always fails to keep up. But now there are more people than ever that want it, more than they want more megapixels in there camera or faster wireless… Who’s going to lead the way?

In fact the best way to discredit bitcoin would be to force premature hyperbitcoinisation