Subnostr

c1

LuisSP

c141120a216331099f7450b05441ac3040dcf71a8393e42a0684dbe7535c7f4d

já fui professor por aí....

>Christianity predates the Bible

In the sense that Adam and Eve were Christians, sure. But if you're suggesting the Bible was created by the Church, your own councils disagree with you. Vatican I explicitly condemns what you're trying to say. The Church is a witness to something that already existed, nothing more.

>Additionally, the original KJV includes the deuterocanon

I know, mine does too. It has books that the Council of Trent removed, like 3 Esdras. Why would the Pope remove books from the Bible?

>My point stands that KJVOnlyism is a subset of Sola Scriptura

They literally aren't the same thing. They're two completely unrelated claims. I'm also not a strict KJVO in the way someone like Steven Anderson, but it's undoubtedly the most important English version, for more reasons than you can count on one hand.

I make it a point not to argue sola scriptura. Not because it's wrong, understood properly, but because people on both sides refuse to understand it properly, so it's a useless hill to die on.

>The Latin never changes

Buy a critical edition. It does. You have old Latin, and tons of variation within the Latin tradition, often referred to as the Western text type. It's actually famous for being the most inaccurate text family that gets any serious consideration.

In current day, Latin editions have the exact same problems as modern Greek critical texts. Though an Old Vulgate only position will get you better results than following modern text critics, due to the nature of what a translation is, it's inherently inferior to my position. Eastern Orthodox have it better, they have their own version of a Greek Received Text that's different from ours, although on internal analysis, it doesn't hold up as well. Romans has a false ending after chapter 14, for example. It's also missing the Comma.

>that full translation predates the Canon

Roman Catholics really need to read the studies of Roger Beckwith. This idea is disproven. The Old Testament canon was decided 200 years before Christ was born. The fact that later Christians (and some jews) were misinformed and got it wrong does nothing to disprove this. Although most of the early Fathers actually do agree that the canon is only 22 books (by the Hebrew numbering) so no matter how you look at it, the Roman Catholic theory of canon doesn't hold up. Nevermind the blatant historical errors in the books.

>Original manuscripts of Greek, Aramaic, and Hebrew are not always available, so when they aren't we always have the Latin.

The Latin is better than nothing, but once printed editions become a relatively affordable thing, there's no reason to use it as a primary source anymore. It has a lot of problems.

>"biblical study" is not Christianity

It's literally the word of God. It doesn't encompass the entirety of the Christian life, but you can't have orthodoxy without it.

there is a religion of the book, where the printed word is everything. It is called Islam. And even it has hadith.

no normative text may function without an authority, not just to decide what is cannon, but also how to interpret it.

that is not a limitation of God, it is a limitation of human language.

no law works without judges - no law can be universal, cover all cases beyond reasonable doubt, without an authority to read it under some tradition, considering some sources and precedents, etc..

we can not make a self-referential universal law for a golf club, without leaving space for "disputes and doubtfull cases will be settled by , or the civil courts of ..."

I even doubt God could do it in a reasonable size using human language.

The Bible is not just a historical text... from it comes normative stuff. A text, even written by God, can not tell by itself what we ought to do without an authority to interpret and confirm it.

Who decided we should move the sabath to sunday? Or forget the Jewish Temple? These are on the Bible, and we do not follow them.

Mike Dilger ☑️

I think we could improve the quality of debate by orders of magnitude with a recipe something like this:

1) The debate is moderated by A.I.

2) As soon as the A.I. detects a person is not directly answering a question, it cuts off their mic and they lose that turn.

3) Everybody has a fixed time to answer, and only one microphone is active at a time so people cannot talk over each other

bad-faith actors will quick learn to ask "Have you stopped beating your wife?" questions.

when the victim tries to explain he loves his wife.... mic is cut....

"do you think combustion vechicles should be banned in 2040, or earlier?"

when the victim starts to say climate change is fake... mic is cut...

and so on...

besides biased AI, we have always to remember that 5th grade boys will always trick the AI in no time.

Se Milei for eleito, em menos de 5 anos vai ter muito brasileiro imigrando para Argentina.

Comprar um imovel lá agora, é, ao meu ver, uma boa aposta.

duvida sincera

vc acha q milei terá cabeça, apoio, time, etc, pra conseguir governar?

ou sera engolido pelo sistema, um novo JB?

mas melhor q os peronistas, até uma árvore consegue ser.

Pergunta aos bolsonaristas: Voces querem mesmo ficar mais 4 anos ouvindo discursinho de 4 linhas? Sério?

JB virou um simbolo.

se existia algum referente, sumiu logo. Mas seguem o simbolo vazio de referente, sem deixar espaco pra ninguem.

veja quem tentou se candidatar contra a ditatura sanitaria, e.g.

ou o weintraub e outros que tentaram via Brasil35

outros deputados q trabalharam, perderam (douglas garcia e cia.)

nao teve voto fora do circulo do simbolo

nao surgiu mais nada pra aglomerar esforcos.

Robôs. Essas linhas do tempo não mostra rigorosamente as postagens no tempo que foi mostrado e somente o que você curtiu mas sim o que está em “alta". Aqui no Nostr não, só mostra o que você decidiu visualizar e na cronologia exata em que foi postado. Isso sim é uma rede social que respeita o usuário fora os outras grandes vantagens como descentralização e anonimato por padrão. Afinal a sua conta é uma chave aleatória apenas. Nem e-mail pede.

há clientes nostr que mostram 'trending' posts, algo como posts com mais iteracoes em uma lista de relays.

nada impede que relays e clientes implementem qq algoritmo de favorecimento q quiserem.

enquanto a maioria teme escalada, WWIII, Irã, blablabla, esse cara tá otimista... achando q o Irã + Hamas perdeu.

sei lá. é uma visão diferente. Mas depende de Israel entrar lá com sucesso, e engolir as baixas q sofrerá.

https://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htwin/articles/20231015.aspx

nao entendi nem achei noticias sobre as desapropriações e conflitos no PA / AM além de vídeos aleatorios do twitter.

já é por causa do fim do marco temporal?

ou é treta antiga, mas o estado só foi pro pau agora?

look at this article about non-german language students in Berlin ~ 40%

as he explains, "non-german language" do NOT include a turk boy whose parents speak german at home.

on the other hand, 'non-german' may include other european immigrants.

https://gatesofvienna.net/2023/10/no-speakee-deutsch/

(there is a link to original german)

Mike Dilger ☑️

You make good points. But I'm a problem-solver by nature and so I'm gonna keep trying to come up with solutions. Please forgive any naivity on my part.

nothing to forgive... that is the nature of brainstorming solutions.

Mike Dilger ☑️

Maybe Argentina should consider bitcoin

I've read BTC usage is increasing there. 10% or something.

And Millei did not promise to "dollarize"

he promised to allow people to use whatever they want in contracts, be US$ or BTC. he says "dollarize" because it will be the most common choice.

That was added in the 500's by a benedictine monk.

the vulgate was closed by st jeronime... and there are a few surviving original exemplars from constantine...

And this is dangerous for Christians. But how did the priests convince the Christians to participate in the Crusades?

the muslins destroyed half of christemdom, getting countries piece by piece, for centuries.

most of the muslim world west of Arabia/Persia was christian before.

even switzerland was briefly sacked by muslims from Fraxinetum (near Marselle). Rome was fully sacked.

there were no international organizations, no UN or NATO, the only supranational organization was the Church -

which took centuries of bad news until it tried to organize a response.

actually, some french nobles were going to Iberia to fight muslims - non-inheriting nobles, mostly, hoping to carve a county for themselves instead of being the brother of the Duke. The first good news for centuries, coming from long distance collaboration.

after centuries of seeing churches destroyed, people reduced to slavery and dhimmitude.

After Manzikert, the Eastern Romans asked for help, even if they were schismatics.

then the pope went to France to push the french idea further.

make the nobles swear not to attack the feufs of the crusaders while they are away (a very important promise even if not always fulfilled).

make them swear to take the cross, build an army, spend sometime there.

the crusades were not successfull in the long term, but they mounted a defense bringing the fight to the mediterranean. No muslim polity in France afterwards, mediteranean islands recovered, etc. To achieve that, the divided kingdoms needed some supranational help that only the Church could provide.

I am confused now. It seems that you are from two different Christian faiths.

The Jews avoided the word "God". So Jesus would not say "I am God" - it would appear a blasphemy inside a blasphemy.

Instead, he choose expressions of even well-known formulas to mean the same thing.

As the passages cited by Finrod show, the jews got the message, so much they tried to stone Him.

Another example:

Jo 14,6 "Jesus saith to him: I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No man cometh to the Father, but by me."

Imagine a leader saying "I am" those things, not "I tell about", "I know about" or "I received a message from God about"

or he is god, or crazy

Regis Pessolano

Qual o verdadeiro problema das microtransações? Até onde deixa de ser um método a mais de se fazer dinheiro e se torna algo predatório e ganancioso?

Conversamos sobre isso no último episódio do Musubi Podcast: "A Criatividade nos Jogos Morreu?"

Ouça agora, link na bio!

https://video.nostr.build/562dc7f4b6d6907f04eb7b53ae394b079786006004bd24cd55676da3c8f47c9f.mp4

encontrei recem formado. disse q trabalhava c/ games. perguntei "o q vc faz lá?" Datamining.

BD com a resposta de cada estimulo. Quais "bosses" geram mais compras de "ajudas". Quais promoções, músicas e estímulos visuais estimulam mais microtransações e/ou tempo de jogo. Tudo cruzado com todos os dados do usuário. Promoção "ganhe 10 moedas no seu aniversário", serve para users entrarem idade. Avatares e itens rosa, femininos, servem para identificar mulheres. Itens cosméticos associados a clubes, correlacionam com a localidade do usuario.

Tudo virando uma máquina de datamining, todos os dados à venda.

Perguntei:

- então o seu trabalho é descobrir como enganar criançinha?

the payment is a distraction - verifying the identity of all users the goal

nostr fixes this 🫡

Obvious... Who charges $1/year is going for the money? it is not worth the hassle.

preparing for universal digital ID or fighting bots...? Or both?

I would kill accounts that do not post in human like patterns.

Yep, there are robots who post in human-like patterns, but if somebody cares enough to keep them, he will pay for them, even if via a thirdparty or front operation.

nostr:nevent1qqsx0zlj53yx2rnnd6dq6n55wpv24adr70k9h43py2vxl5ze4mq3x8cppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyv9kh2uewd9hj7t82h5a

I agree, cutting off the water is too extreme. The bombing bit is debatable, Hamas deliberately surrounds themselves with civilians. They are responsible for those deaths more than the Israelis are. It's a bit like challenging another dude to a fight and then hiding behind your girlfriend or a child when he starts throwing punches at you.

Hamas aren't a group of isolated terrorists. They are the government of Gaza. The vast majority of people in Gaza support their actions. It's not as clear cut between civilians and the baddies.

I understand the curring of water/energy. Israel declared war.

Sending freebies to enemy territory in war is... in principle... treason. I would not do it before lawyering up strongly.

but, exchanging something for something, like energy for hostages... that is negociation.

Also, if they really want to invade soon, water and energy would help the enemy to prepare himself.

Anyway, it appears they returned water to south gaza - which they said would not be invaded

Mike Dilger ☑️

Hamas was voted in in 2006 or something like that. Only 22% of people alive now (I think) were part of that vote, so they should probably have another one. They may have changed their minds. At the time of the original vote, there is evidence Israeli leaders wanted Hamas to win so they could treat them militarily instead of needing to continue the peace process, and starved Fatah of campaign funds... but maybe that's just what some idiot said. Surely many of them still support violence.

In any case, Israel has legitimate security concerns. But so does Gaza. So IMHO Israel should not be the one enforcing the peace, a third party should step in and do it. And I know the U.N. is a dumpster fire, but it is all the world has, even Putin still works with it because there is no alternative. So maybe a U.N. peacekeeping force could be utilized. Israel would not agree, so it would have to be forced upon them.

I support Israel's right to exist, but only if they support Palestine's right to exist. They've had a long time to work that out, and when pressed they just point to the one part of the negotiations where Arafat rejected a bad deal, as though that was the end of all possible negotiations. At some point someone has to call it full-time on this delaying and revoke recognition of Israel as a state. Yes, that's hardball, but they don't respond to anything other.

do you know that peacekeepers don't stop whoever wants to fight?

they just separate the parties and watch to avoid unintentional scalation, accidents, etc.

At most, they avoid no-warning attacks and "the other side started shooting" blame wars because the parties are supposed to ask them to leave before attacking.

Before the 1967 war, Egypt asked the peacekepers to leave, and they left.

Last week, peacekeepers on Lebanon-Israel border stopped patrols and returned to their bases on their own volition - they are not going to work if one of the parties want to start shooting.

last month, russian peacekeepers did not fight Azerbaijan. Nagorno-Karabakh is gone for Armenia.

why would soldiers from 3rd countries accept to die?

if you mean having UN soldiers controlling Gaza, that is not peacekeeping, that is a territorial mandate, which is costlier and riskier. Who wants to run a neo-colony, have their own soldiers hunt terrorists, besides being blamed by every adminstrative or security trouble? And who is going to convince Hamas to leave?

Hahahhahaha

Já, já vão estar bradando: imposto é roubo!!!👏👏👏👏

Lula, nunca te critiquei.

Kkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

https://video.nostr.build/6bff6f0bffa29b481e38e0334fccc59a18bdf1081047d88c7126f35af2fad487.mp4

Caralho, até a mina de cabelo azul entendeu e explicou direitinho!

Mas esse imposto não é pra arrecadar nem tanto pra defender o Magazine Luisa...

quem ganhará mesmo é o contrabando em escala industrial que abastece camelôs e "galerias populares" abraçados com o resto do crime organizado.

Fiat Lux⚡️🔐🐧🔎

SOBRE BOICOTES - Um passo à frente

- Ponto positivo:

Os conservadores perceberam o poder do boicote, isso é ótimo.

Agora, vem o condicionamento para evoluir dentro dessa importante estratégia de guerra cultural.

1) Por definição, o BOICOTE consiste na interrupção do consumo de um produto ou serviço como forma de protesto.

2) O boicote não prevê indicar um produto substituto, sob o risco de promover uma marca ainda pior que aquela boicotada.

Ou seja, é o famoso pular da panela para cair no fogo.

Exemplo:

Há pessoas recomendando, por inocência ou má-fé, o consumo de Kit-Kat (Nestlé) ou da Hersheys no lugar do Bis.

Ora, tratam-se de duas empresas que promovem a ideologia de gênero e o terrorismo ambiental no mundo todo.

Como proceder?

Na dúvida, fique apenas com o boicote, e ponto final.

Ou você corre o risco de fazer propaganda para aqueles que almejam te destruir.

https://t.me/rafaelfontananews/3457

o melhor é promover marcas locais menores, não controladas pelos mesmos globalistas.

o boicote serve pra assustar a publicitaria de cabelo azul e não deixar fechar a janela de overton,

mas não pra diminuir o lucro, se os concorrentes pertencem ao mesmo oligopolio.

makomichi the wolf of weeb street

Japan will fall if the ESG doesn't fall. Japanese executives have been trying to follow trends in the last few years, including NFTs and shitcoins, they will take the bait.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWjreAb6GGI

I was scared seing Toyota kicking Toyoda out (the grandson of the founder) due to his refusal to focus on eletric-only.

And another car maker (Nissan or Hyunday?) closing their research faciltiies on combustion motors.

The japs see west starting to jump from a bridge, then they jump tied with a rocket to go faster.

Load More