❤️💯❤️💯❤️
Siezing power through coersion, whether its informal through armies, gangs and mafias, or formal through kingdoms, theocracies, republics or democracies, is a persistent threat. The state of anarchy is always temporary until one of those comes along and promises protection in exchange for a fee, voluntarily or not.
Who is still pissed about #daylightsaving two days later?
I never partook
#welcome to The Nostr
Even Elon Musk has realized what is going on at Bluesky: https://fxtwitter.com/elonmusk/status/1767273166374633895
What's the point of a distributed system if its intended to be censorable?
You are imaginging things. I offered a real solution, and your proposal is to continue to fail.
That's exactly what someone would say that has a big hardon for uncle Claus
Fix the problem
Telling people that voting for bitcoin only is fighting FOR the WEF.
The WEF wants you to do nothing.
The WEF will install people like O'biden
The WEF will make bitcoiners criminals
Know who the real enemy is.
Do you work for the WEF nostr:npub1c856kwjk524kef97hazw5e9jlkjq4333r6yxh2rtgefpd894ddpsmq6lkc ?
Question anyone not fighting for your right to vote.
Question those pushing you not to vote even more.
Get over your hardon for the irrelevent WEF.
You can vote all day long and it wont make one iota of a difference. I vote, but I also know its a waste of time, so I waste my time on the off chance it makes a difference this time. You are wrong in many layers:
1) you believe your vote matters, this is like saying your lottery ticket has a chance of winning.
2) one person's vote is miniscule
3) the majority mean nothing when the people in power are reporting who won the untraceable and unauditable election
4) the only people you can vote for are already controlled, either with promises, payments, blackmale or all of the above
5) even if you get someone in that truly represents you and fights to fix the system to your benefit, they are either crowded out, absorbed, or killed by the system
6) to say one election or one person is going to fix anything is hopeless hopium, you might as well be saving in dollars.
7) looking to the government to "fix things" is to turn a blind eye to the fact that all our problems are from the government, including pernicious theft through legal tender laws, central banking, income tax and government taking out debt in our name.
Voting isnt a plan to fix anything. Agreed it needs to be fixed, but voting is simoly passing the reigns to the enemy within.
"Money is a technology for measuring fucks given."
ICYMI: #BitcoinTalk with Sci-Fi author Devon Eriksen, author of Theft of Fire 🔥
Fountain: https://fountain.fm/episode/pEdajMJqHvFOIRXgoXYf
Everywhere else: https://pod.link/1694392423/episode/25a3a86710ab2bd64db537d3a8769968
YouTube: https://youtu.be/TlPpJ45AcX0
#Titcoin
This is a very good interview
Trump and JFK are no different. They are a whole lot of talk but flap in the wind when the time comes to set sail. Bitcoin is the only vote that matters.
I think whoever lent him the money for that bond is lending it at a rate of 0.5% per year, according to his "sneakers" interview. They aren't lending it to him to make money on the 100M, they bought the next president for peanuts.
Trump is for sale, and he only accepts green paper.
Decentralization > uncensorability?
I doubt this is your stand. Nostr is built on IP. Lets suppose they can censor IP and DNS. From what I see, nostr already addresses this risk with its architecture. Again, you jump to solutions but haven't amswered my question.
What is the underlying problem that nostr needs to solve? What are the requirements to that solution? Is it to solve the problem that people want to edit their own posts, is it to optimize relay bandwidth or is it to be a decentralized protocol? I doubt it is any of these.
I see nostr's primary aim is to enable uncensorable communication with a minimalistic protocol design. Tell me why I'm wrong.
#meme #memestr #nostrmeme #bitcoinThere was never any need to pay off the national debt once Nixon left us from the gold standard. We only need to keep paying interest on the debt as long as we want to keep it as our legal tender.
Those are implementatiom details. What is the requirement you intend to fulfill with "no IPs and no DNS"?
Nostr is was never about building the "ideal", it was about building a thing that works well enough.
In the sense of "ideals of uncensorable" I didn't mean the implementation needs to be ideal, only that uncensorability is the ideal to strive for.
I dont know how its implemented or why it adds complexity to the relays, but the very concept of editing or deleting notes shouldn't be contrary to the ideals of uncensorable communication