It can also be evidence of the mint losing connextion with its lightning node. You would be able to transact ecash, but minting new tokens or redeeming them would fail.

There is only one server, the mint.

Ah, thats interesting. Generally it happens when you lose contact with the server, or it goes down while youre trying to redeem nuts. It could be some timeout issue you need to wait for. In the past, it fixes itself when they reboot the server/mint

Its the server

This is normal. It clears up when they unfuck their server.

The surest way to ossify #bitcoin is to create a gigantic welfare program for anyone who wields the scepter of commit access and his cronies.

I'm not siding with Saylor because I trust his judgement, but because we happen to agree about this.

This "going back to 1800's abortion laws" tactic is generally what happens when you have a democrat governor and democrat attorney general, even if there are clear and more modern laws on the state's books, to instill FUD into the medical community (usually loaded with cowardly liberals). This is to turn them into pawns of the left agenda to actually deprive women of necessary and moral medical treatments so that women die for their cause and they can then publicize it for their agenda of absolute and total compelled control over our bodies (for both men and women) by the central federal government

Women need to get on the ball with the constitution. Read the 9th and 10th ammendment. The best possible outcome is when SCOTUS says the feds have no business legislating medical procedures and criminal law within a state. We all should see this is as a restoration of the fundamental agreement made between the states in 1788.

Its the go-to for shitcoining

No thanks, I am just surprized that I'm not joansing for it at 10pm like usual

No, but usually thats after 36 hours

I think we should ask companies with billions lying around to write checks to some kid that did something several years ago because they got a patch into mainline of bitcoin. In fact, they should create an enormous incentive to get in the club of people that can claim some of those checks, and create a protectorate around any patches making it into production code in the "official" repository lest the corporate donatioms are further diluted to outsider developers. We really need a group of people to claim ownership of the "official" codebase that have so much donated money they can hire PR firms and strategists to market their "contributions to the open source community" to generate more interest in donating to their "selfless activities." This way we won't be flapping in the wind, like today, rudderless and without a central standardizing organization to tell us the proper direction for bitcoin. I really don't understand Saylor's gripe with Kathy.

No coffee in 12 hours, and I ain't even sick

Women ALWAYS tailgate

Your website is down

The test could be run on an internal private network fairly easily. Each client could be on a separate VM, possibly even all 20 clients could be on one machine and it done with the bridge interfaces of docker containers.

Yes

Change the name of roundabouts to jungle circles and people will love them

Was twitter taken over by government pension fund managers, intelligence agencies, or international drug cartels as a result of going public?

Decentralized anticensorship Nostriches