The first step in realistic kindness and real empathy is to recognize reality. And working to eradicate, or allowing the eradication of, existing races by mixing them is definitely not kindness.

No, you're totally wrong about that. Most people, when left alone, tend to form kinship-based (that is, race-based) societies -- unless men with guns stop them. The fact that there are exceptions to this does not invalidate the premise, and the descendants of any mixed population eventually feel themselves to be a race and act according to Nature anyway.

Here's how you see the _really_ long term trend I am talking about (and this applies not only to humans, but to other creatures too): Once upon a time, many many millennia ago, all existing human races had a common ancestor. There were no racial differences between them then. But, since then, many, many differences have developed. They have racially diverged. This is how new species are eventually born. Evolution cannot take place without this process.

To answer your question: It is better for people to maintain their racial integrity because 1) there is great value in what Nature has created over tens of millennia (and there is great evil in destroying it), and 2) because panmixia is anti-evolution.

They may indeed do all those things that you say. But the facts remain: Forced multiracialism is genocide. And voluntary multiracialism is suicide.

I should add that monoracial nations are definitely not something only of the past. Ideologies (most of them harmful or insane or both) come and go. Evolution (and the race-creation it entails) is eternal. Nature and evolution cannot be suppressed forever.

The long-term trend is that the races are becoming _more different_ as time passes. A blip in the other direction caused by Christianity and liberalism cannot change that for long.

I could put it another way, too. If you live in a place in which you are more or less guaranteed to have great-grandchildren of your own race -- then you live in a true nation. On the other hand, if you live a place where this is far from certain, then you have been conquered and live as a subject in an empire.

People move for many different reasons. There is conquest. There is infiltration. There is takeover. There is crass materialism (I want more money!). There is escape from tyranny. But, whatever the reason, it is better for all peoples to maintain their racial integrity.

Yes, you can do things that decrease human differences. But this is equivalent to forcing wolves and beagles to live in the same enclosure. It is unnatural and oppressive, and can only happen when men with guns enforce it. (And it really doesn't matter if the men with guns pretend they are supporting the divine right of kings or the divine right of "the majority.") When people are left to their own devices, they tend to form kinship-based (that is, race-based) societies. And that is a natural and good thing.

If you violate DEI, you are punished by centralized authorities. Therefore it it is enforcing multiracialism. The people are given no choice.

People naturally want to live with people who are of the same or similar background. Ancient Greece, for example, was a kinship-based state. To a large extent, Japan is one today. Kinship-based states are the kind of states that people naturally make when men with guns don't stop them.

I think you're wrong about that. Very small percentage differences in DNA can have massive biological consequences. The percentage difference is almost irrelevant. For an analogy, I can change one line of code in a 500,000-line program and change it from a functioning Bitcoin node into a program that displays a picture of Donald Trump with a cat on his head.

Reading things on X now feels like monitoring enemy transmissions.

What a bunch of worthless murderers, criminals, and parasites there are in Langley. That's not to say DeepSeek is any good. It's almost as heavily censored and programmed with "woke" nonsense as Jewish-run LLMs. in the US. I honestly expected better from the Chinese, but I was wrong.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzp6xkv5v7gwcjzjkx370jhk7y8pk5rtrxkgx95fstnvzpqfuyqa8fqqsz9leu3gg7de7lv5cwamc0pme3y294yljpqtwdywl6ye7jhtwz5wqftj6vc

I want my race to continue existing, and it cannot do so in a world order of centrally enforced multiracialism, with the essential banning of kinship-based states for European-descended people. Does that make me a racist by your definition?

Preventing one race from ruling over another is a worthy goal. Ending centralized empires and instituting kinship-based states solves this problem. For those too deeply infected with the multiracialist mind-virus, I suspect there will always be some multiracial states.

Evolution cannot happen without racial divergence. And evolution is happening. Therefore races exist, as much among humans as any other species.

DeepSeek just told me that there are no human races or subspecies "because gene flow happens." Uh -- no. All subspecies are interconnected by gene flow. That's why they are subspecies, not species yet. Sheesh, what a stupid argument. I thought Chinese scientists were far more intelligent than that!

Realists and honest people acknowledge that human races exist and are different. No one is saying racial or even species boundaries are "rigid." That's a straw man. No serious person ever said that they are. The Pacific Ocean gradually changes into the Indian Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico and the Mississippi River. And the Mississippi River gradually connects to a tiny spring in Itasca, Minnesota. But no sane person would assert that, because of that, the spring behind my house is the same as the Pacific Ocean, or that the Pacific Ocean does not exist.

Mice, for example, diverge into subspecies, and races or varieties, which are precursors in many cases to speciation. So do hippos, sea stars, and sequoias. No species that has ever existed or will ever exist is exempt from this principle. But many humans (including the trainers of DeepSeek, to my great astonishment) refuse to acknowledge that this applies to human beings. This is a bizarre and absurd quasi-religious belief, no more valid than belief in demons or dragons.

Setting up authoritarian centralized systems like DEI to enforce multiracialism is suppressing the natural evolutionary process, and is hence an unnatural evil of an unparalleled scale.

Human races exist and are part of the evolutionary process. They are becoming more different over time. (This is quite obvious when you take the long-term view: They all had a common ancestor, so at one time there were no differences between them. Now there are many differences. Hence, the logic that _the differences have increased_ is irrefutable.)