Avatar
Gustavo
c3caba20313ab8a447d9aae50f45ef505a8454c5748f60e0ce013541f80e20f2
Replying to Avatar Luxas

😳

We need a new era of 0 to 1 inventions. We've had enough of 1 to n.

My day is done with this:

https://github.com/chep/copilot-chat.el

Chad chep, awesome work

Replying to Avatar UNCLE ROCKSTAR

Now that nostr:npub1getal6ykt05fsz5nqu4uld09nfj3y3qxmv8crys4aeut53unfvlqr80nfm NWC no longer works, what is a comparable wallet that can be used to zap people so that zaps are visible to others?

I've tried sending sats to ln invoice nostr:npub1sn0rtcjcf543gj4wsg7fa59s700d5ztys5ctj0g69g2x6802npjqhjjtws generates as well as nostr:npub1yzvxlwp7wawed5vgefwfmugvumtp8c8t0etk3g8sky4n0ndvyxesnxrf8q wallet (great app btw), but these zaps don't show on other clients ;(

Honest q: does Strike have NWC? If seems not. Does Jack want that eventually?

Replying to Avatar Tim Bouma

Describe how AI and ecash are symbiotic, like lichen. #chatgpt

———-

AI (Artificial Intelligence) and eCash (digital or electronic cash) can be likened to the symbiotic relationship found in lichen, where two distinct entities work together to create a mutually beneficial ecosystem. Here’s how:

1. AI as the “Fungus” (Mycobiont)

• Just as the fungus provides structure and protection in lichen, AI serves as the infrastructure that enables the efficient functioning of eCash systems.

• AI can optimize security protocols (like fraud detection and prevention) and improve efficiency through predictive algorithms, data analytics, and automated transaction processing.

• AI ensures scalability and resilience, much like the fungus protects the photosynthetic partner in harsh environments.

2. eCash as the “Alga/Cyanobacterium” (Photobiont)

• eCash functions as the lifeblood of the system, driving the economic activity that AI supports.

• It generates and facilitates the flow of data, which AI thrives on for training, optimization, and decision-making.

• eCash also benefits AI by providing real-world use cases and applications, such as digital payments, blockchain transactions, and decentralized finance.

3. Mutual Benefit:

• AI benefits from eCash by gaining access to the vast amounts of transactional data required to refine its algorithms and improve its functionality. This data allows AI systems to learn patterns, enhance fraud detection, and personalize financial experiences.

• eCash benefits from AI by becoming more secure, efficient, and user-friendly. For instance, AI-powered systems can verify transactions in real-time, optimize payment processing speeds, and ensure robust cybersecurity.

4. Creating a New Ecosystem:

• Together, AI and eCash create an interdependent ecosystem that fuels innovation in industries like fintech, e-commerce, and decentralized finance (DeFi).

• Similar to how lichen thrive in environments where neither fungus nor algae could survive alone, AI and eCash together enable advances like autonomous financial systems and predictive economic modeling.

In this analogy, AI provides the technological framework (fungus), while eCash provides the transactional “energy” and purpose (alga/cyanobacterium). Together, they revolutionize how digital economies function, thriving symbiotically in an interconnected, data-driven world.

Is it only me not being able to see figures?

The reverse infinite money glitch

Replying to Avatar rabble

The fall of the Assad Regime in Syria seemed to come out of nowhere. After 13 years of civil war, most of which had been a stalemate for years, one group of rebels takes over Aleppo, Homs, and finally Damascus in two weeks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_the_Assad_regime

So who are the rebels? Tahrir al Sham https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tahrir_al-Sham They’re a faction that is opposed to Al-Queda and ISIS with some support from Qatar and Turkey. It seems like it’s mostly a remixing of Islamic groups which had led the civil war for a long time, but when Iran, Russia, Hezbollah, Israel, and The US got distracted elsewhere they were able to use some support from Turkey to finally overthrow Assad and capture Damascus. My guess is once they took Aleppo and discovered Assad wasn’t able to bring in help in a counter offensive then faith in the regime amongst its soldiers collapsed.

I’m personally really concerned about what will happen to the Rojava, the autonomous Kurdish region ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomous_Administration_of_North_and_East_Syria ). At the start of the civil war Kurds who are aligned with the Turkish PKK took over and liberated their own land, then got support from the US to defeat ISIS. The region has been effectively an independent country for the last 12 years. Ideologically the PKK used to be a Marxist group but they shifted to Social Ecology, a branch of left Anarchism founded by Murray Bookchin a couple decades ago. They do not believe in a centralized government and have run their region with a network of independent democratic local governments, associations, businesses, and militias. The US government maintains military bases and cooperation with Rojava. While many people in Rojava are religious the movement is multiethnic and non-Islamist in its political ideology. I find it kind of crazy that such an interesting radical political and economic project can emerge in what is clearly one of the most difficult and conflict ridden places.

Despite the US and Turkish governments being close allies and the US providing military support to the Kurds in Rojava, the Turkish government hates the Kurdish sovereignty movement. Turkey wants to prevent the emergence of any independent Kurdish country, even one without a state as such like exists in Rojava.

Will Turkey turn on and invade Rojava now that they have something like allies in power in Damascus? It doesn’t seem to make like Tahrir al Sham is an agent of Turkey, there are militias directly under the control of Turkey occupying land which is nominally Syrian, plus regular Turkish troops, but more like Tahrir al Sham is just getting support where it can. So we shall see.

One last thing I find interesting is the positive statements put out by governments around the world about the fall of the Assad regime to an organization that those same governments have declared a terrorist group. Does a terrorist grouping become a military when it gains control of a nation state?

Gotta love black swams

Replying to Avatar Tim Bouma

The Rules of St. Benedict and the Cypherpunk Manifesto: A Blueprint for a New Digital Order

In an age where digital systems are redefining human interaction, governance, and privacy, the ancient Rule of St. Benedict and the modern Cypherpunk Manifesto seem to share unlikely parallels that could inspire a new digital order. Both texts, separated by more than a millennium, offer frameworks for creating resilient communities built on discipline, transparency, and autonomy.

The Rule of St. Benedict: A Blueprint for Monastic Life

Written in the 6th century by Benedict of Nursia, the Rule of St. Benedict provided guidelines for monastic communities to thrive amid the political and cultural chaos of the early Middle Ages. It emphasized a balance of prayer, labor, and study, underpinned by strict discipline and shared governance. The Rule sought to create self-sustaining communities where individuals contributed to the collective good while maintaining personal spiritual growth.

Key principles include:

1. Obedience and stability: Members adhered to the Rule to foster collective order and harmony.

2. Self-sufficiency: Monasteries aimed to operate independently of external powers, ensuring autonomy.

3. Transparency and accountability: Regular councils and feedback ensured decisions were made in the community’s best interest.

The Cypherpunk Manifesto: A Call for Digital Privacy and Freedom

In 1993, Eric Hughes penned the Cypherpunk Manifesto, calling for the use of cryptography to preserve individual freedoms in the digital era. It rejected centralized control and surveillance, advocating for tools that empower individuals to maintain privacy and autonomy.

Key tenets include:

1. Decentralization: A commitment to systems that operate without reliance on central authorities.

2. Privacy as a right: Cryptography as a shield against intrusion and misuse of personal data.

3. Transparency through code: Open-source tools as a means to ensure accountability and trust.

Parallels Between the Rule and the Manifesto

At their core, both texts strive to create systems that balance the needs of individuals with the stability of the collective. Their parallels are striking:

1. Self-Sustaining Ecosystems

Just as Benedictine monasteries thrived by being self-sufficient, the cypherpunk vision emphasizes decentralized systems that minimize dependency on external authorities. Blockchain, for example, mirrors the monastic emphasis on autonomy, with its immutable ledgers fostering trust without intermediaries.

2. Transparency and Governance

Benedictine monasteries held regular councils where all voices were heard, a precursor to today’s democratic and transparent governance models in decentralized digital communities. Similarly, the cypherpunk ethos champions open-source technologies that anyone can audit or improve.

3. Discipline and Collective Responsibility

Monks were bound by a disciplined structure, contributing to the common good. This is echoed in the cypherpunk movement’s commitment to collectively building cryptographic tools and protocols that protect individual freedoms.

Toward a New Digital Order

The synthesis of these two frameworks could inspire a new digital order—one where discipline and autonomy coexist in harmony. This order might manifest in:

• Decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) that operate like monasteries, with self-governing rules encoded in smart contracts.

• Privacy-focused digital communities that prioritize security and individual rights while fostering collaboration.

• Resilient digital economies modeled after the Benedictine ideal of self-sufficiency, reducing dependency on centralized platforms or governments.

As the digital landscape evolves, looking to history’s resilient frameworks like the Rule of St. Benedict alongside forward-thinking philosophies like the Cypherpunk Manifesto offers a path to balance freedom and order in a rapidly changing world. The fusion of ancient wisdom with modern technology may well be the foundation for a more equitable and secure digital age.