The idea of it having to be every dev for themselves when it comes to developing clients. Why have 50 devs working on 50 different good, but not really great, clients, when they should be grouping up and focusing on 2-3 bigger and more robust clients. To me, this would create a standard of what NIPs Twitter alternatives should be implementing by default. Then again I'm not a developer so keep my ignorance in mind.

That also leads to this feeling of not really knowing what the hell nostr is supposed to be. I use it exclusively as a Twitter/X alternative. That's what people fleeing X most likely want. But we have 50 devs working on 50 good but not great clients that fill 50 wildly different roles. That's going to confuse the hell out of the normies. My peanut gallery take is devs should focus on establishing a large userbase for the microblogging apps, then figure out what roles nostr tackles next.

Seems intermittent. Hard to provide much details.

For all I know user error.

VPN is a crap experience on the rest of my apps though.

Google: "who dis? Find the find bicycles or U no search."

Etc.

That's a result of the chicken and egg paradox. People aren't joining because most content is centered around bitcoin thus no diversity, and content isn't moving away from bitcoin and becoming more diverse because people aren't joining.