Why so toxic a response to someone crticising continuation of a war? Are you that immune to the suffering this causes?

I do freedom tech

Kids can't move on their own. Likely many are already doing just that and providing intel and sabotaging infrastructure, trying to undermine or overthrow the regime for years, it just a secret and not shown in media. What now?

Code is speech.

Are you really this stupid? The US was the only country with nukes then.

Yes. Seems you do not understand the point I made. I would have the same conclusion no matter who wants to wipe out whatever country. This is just wrong and disgusting, there is no such thing as 100% evil population, there are kids, women and men that hate what their government is doing (but can't (yet) revolt/oppose what they are doing).

You don't seem to understand what the use of a nuke would mean. It would mean the end of civilization. That is the worst possible tool.

It won't stop current wars, but may avoid future wars.

Someone needs to read Rothbard, maybe two someones.

I'm under the impression that some of your rationalization is coming from the fact you live in Ukraine and current situation means you will justify the most illiberal takes.

Trashy.

"Can someone please explain the difference between the mafia and the government to me"

#Government #Mafia #Liberty #Bitcoin #Meme

It's incomprehensible to me that some Bitcoiners will talk about "low time-preference" and "fiat art" and post images of the gorgeous nature places they have visited and how the world would be so much more beautiful in a Bitcoin standard -- and then in the next second they resume their vomiting of the most ugly "meme" images that are actually trying to be ugly.

You are supporting a lot of murder of human beings over imaginary lines to get on a high horse and belittle my world view.

Iran was not always a theocracy. Neither was Afghanistan. The western world's meddling was a significant driver of their radicalization.

I don't know the path of funding for Irans weapons, too lazy to weed through the misinformation to get an answer. When we went to war with Afghanistan after 911, the weapons they used to fight back were paid for by the US government to help them defend themselves from the Russians.

Government is the problem. A government is attacking another government. Governments killed 100x more people than every other type of murderer combined in the 20th century. Somehow your solution is more government.

This is a stupid argument. I don't need to pay to shoot down rockets if I don't buy them the rockets after paying to install a dictator in place of a democracy then paying to bomb them into radicalization.