kinda true. people run lightning nodes of their api :|
🤯
just use a pseudonym dawg
The destiny of the world depends on these men and other, just as unlikely, heroes. What time to be alive lol. 
Well, I should say, there may someday be such a computer. For the time being, you’re right.
Yes there is. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive private keys from public keys.
Yeah, they’re always trying butt into projects and lure them into censorship (or safety or moderation or whatever your nice euphemism is). Competent people believe in freedom but are a minority. We can win if we have a common point to organize around. Nostr is good for that. The only way to effectively censor it, is to censor the internet itself. Whatever our differences, I think we can all get behind an uncensored internet.
Again:
You are in the dark about these things just like everyone else. There’s no evaluation to do. You don’t know. That’s the point of conspiring.
No one is asking you to prove anything. No one is claiming there are red teapots in the orbit of pluto.
Epistemic humility is the only thing I would urge you to consider. Why proclaim something you cannot possibly verify or invalidate?
“It is not a global conspiracy.”
How could you possibly know this? Isn’t the whole point of conspiring to keep something secret?
It’s like a mempool for nostr events
If you had read carefully I was not defending using coincidences, I was merely saying that even this low level of “reasoning” is above your strategy of “just making a totally unwarranted confident statement”.
Live again since yesterday! https://ourchan.org nostr:note184dmpht95ey0wp7lg0waplyq87tth70ptv6ts4ue5kefr4phv08qpu6vp3
😅 shoulda checked. awesome!
I miss ourchan #[0]
Talking about these things like you’re in a position to know anything is foolish.
You don’t know, just like the people speculating about conspiracies don’t know. But at least they usually cite some suspicious coincidence, all you’ve done is make a confident statement about something you have no right to be confident about.
