Avatar
Rik πŸ”₯ πŸ” πŸƒ 🌊
ca447ffbd98356176bf1a1612676dbf744c2335bb70c1bc9b68b122b20d6eac6
Empower others, kill my daemons and perform together. πŸš€

#nostr, how trustworthy is NIP44 encryption? Would it be wise to store my personal agenda/tasklists as NIP17-messages to myself? On my own relay, of course. #asknostr

Replying to Avatar BitPopArt

Awesome, how does this work? What can I do with it? 😎

GM

And welcome in the #bullish #bitcorner

Yes, have great fun each morning scavenging all parts together! πŸ› 

**Manifesto of Interdependence**

In society, there is a continuous friction between the interests of the individual and the interests of the collective. The individual seeks self-expression; the collective seeks continuity. In our current system, these are represented by neo-liberal, "right-wing" thinking for the individual and socialist, "left-wing" thinking for the collective. These are presented as opposites, yet neither can exist without the other. The individual perishes without the collective; there is no collective without individuals. Although they seem to exist separately, they are two sides of the same coin.

I believe there is a way out of polarization when we acknowledge that we are mutually dependent on the other for our existence (in the broadest sense of the word). This also means that both opposing poles must recognize that their vision is not the absolute truth but, on the contrary, an understanding that is relative to the understanding of the other. As long as we fight the other, we are essentially fighting ourselves. If the other dies, we die as well, for who are we without the other?

I have no guiding principles, for this is a search we should do together, without laying our rules upon the other.

Awesome, thanks for sharing! Know to find me if anything breaks, happy to help!

Focusing on the others, can help overcoming your inner daemons

I don't think these compare in that way. Besides that, based on proper study (referencing "the invisible gorilla" here), human beings are terrible at a lot of cognitive tasks which are fundamental to what you are proposing. So no I am inclined to disbelieve anything which has "common sense" as a basis, or at least I challenge my human reaction to believe it.

Anyway, we know _from research_ that men have, on average, more muscle power. So on average men are stronger, but a lot of women are stronger than a lot of men. And wether that's beneficial depends entirly on the goal you're trying to achieve. How much they work together etc etc. So the statement is arbitrary at its best. Wether or not you vote democrat or republican based on your hormonelevels are, is of quite a different order of impact on society if you ask me.

Wether or not tax dollars should be spent is a political choice.