I'm half way through. Also give this a listen: https://fountain.fm/episode/SLMx9q20zffvOgbYSaEz
I know someone (ex-colleague) who's just become architect of a project building on BSV. When I brought to their attention the history and prominent figures such as CW and CA they ignored me. I do not understand why they think building on BSV is a good idea, other than it's easier and funding (same argument I hear for other L1s such as SOL). How do we get folks to understand the dangers of their actions.
Are you even a real Lynhead if you didn’t get the hard copy??
Mine comes tomorrow 🧡
nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a nostr:note1dlpuyp3nrkuar7wuzl5tfhhmwygqqs9ghn9fea6rpjafryrjstvqyrdzh9
I got the soft, no hard copy available on amazon here 😔
Get some rice straws, they are chewable.
can you give an explanation or reference to what eventID1 eventnID2 are?
It doesn't apply due to bitcoin's difficulty adjustment. Bitcoin has a target rate of inflation. More miners and cheaper energy does not increase bitcoin's issuance over the long term.
nostr:npub1l2vyh47mk2p0qlsku7hg0vn29faehy9hy34ygaclpn66ukqp3afqutajft brought up in this interview that one of the big problems with Nostr he acknowledges is the fact it is very data intensive which translates to cost on mobile networks.
I'm trying to get him interested in adding something to the base protocol that could drastically reduce the amount of network chatter between relays and clients, reducing cost, time and energy. I'm not a developer though so I don't know how to do this through the proper channels, please talk to me if you want to take it forward.
The proxy Pablo made is a good solution. Not everyone will run their own node but it could be offered as a temporary service for those travelling with data restrictions. Although, battery consumption is also a reason to optimise.