Avatar
S!ayer
cdecc31c6d9406e9a7d6b0067412aa661d9d31c8035c3fd65c06301d1cac3b92
I tend to make weird noises when I see dogs. Always making jokes. XMR: 88wzRKPrXho9Z3LKbbhDskaBnmo8rYdweSj6uMgenFEvEsFpkThU2wZL87R4GxkghJ5qmCrMGZNX4T2JpPpVCGCs94RoVYN

100%. It's subjective really, but that's why I wanted to know.

I feel that Grok is the most egregious of the pack, but there's open source LLMs and community ones too which are much better.

The more i see the less i know

the more i like to let it go

not saying all LLMs don't carry bias or misinformation datasources, but Grok is an explicit case of egregious use where it, not only, openly admits to it, but has inserted the misinfomation content into unrelated replies making it stand out even more.

Yet, I still see it here on Nostr, and more importantly, people are still okay with using it.

I didn't even know; damn. I guess a lot of the stuff is getting lost in the weeds out here. Do you know how to call the LLM? was it an @ or a # ? I wonder if they are still active

"The more energy is produced, the more people will consume."

Do you know how the system works? I don't think you do.

Learn about how electricity is produced and transmitted then we can have a viable conversation otherwise this is pointless

because I'm a realist. fossil fuel extraction, coal and oil and gas is what drives our world's growing demand.

We don't run ships on solar. We run them on oil and gas. We don't burn coal like we did in the 40's - 'clean' coal is a thing because we reprocess plume and harvest that materials into sulphur and other things. It's a lot cleaner and get's 'cleaner' everyday. It provides a huge amount of jobs vs solar and wind.

I am a full supporter of renewables too. I invested in companies that do solar, wind and gas from methane.

Energy is energy kiddo, you're being the child here stop hou jou bek and stop assuming shit

so if Nostr had an LLM, people would opt to use that instead?

cause and effects:

when i say your borders are open in part because of cheap labour, well, here is the reason why.

That's also why ICE isn't heading to the South or to the plantations in Montana or elsewhere to 'hunt illegals' but only in cities? why not the farmlands?

No doubt we'll see some border policy changes in the next administration. It's why they're so keen on pulling in Boers this administration but getting IT support staff instead 🤣 .

The problem is you still need farmhands and that's generally PoC immigrants who have no rights and no recourse so they can be underpaid, overworked and abused. Farmers LOVE illegals more than crack cocaine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pjOAUSN9-I&ab_channel=KPAX-TV

GM

let's get the Ciabatta

I guess so. I wonder if Nostr has an LLM implementation? Does it even really need one?

Maybe a replybot would be kind of great as you call the LLM with a question and tag or @ and then it replies with the content.

nostr:npub1de6l09erjl9r990q7n9ql0rwh8x8n059ht7a267n0q3qe28wua8q20q0sd what do you think?

You want to build on your LLM models and hook it up?

FYI this is a common thing in lower GDP countries. Higher childbirth rates are higher because infant mortality is higher (or was, I working on decade old info here)

So imagine, if you had 10 kids, and 6 died, you would at least have 4 survive past the age of 10 and take care of you as you get older. They also need more hands to work to bring in incomes in low income areas. More hand = more work = more income

It's the same reason why 150 years ago people were having so many more kids, bigger families.

Now no one fucks because they are career driven, no time to fuck and make kids when you're fucking and making money.

and yet Grok has notoriously been cooked to lie and spread misinformation?

Nice to have it. I setup an n8n process to run vulnerability checks on existing sites

Lagarde saw Tether and now she's frothing

Why do people use grok?

yeah and that's where I think the core devs see the value in on-chain data I guess. One only sees memes and jpeg spam, others see smart contracts or mortgages etc.

but then again, it's just taking off one wheel and putting on another, what changes? you replace fiat with bitcoin and still do fiat things, but just with bitcoin?

This is what I'm not having a hard time getting over since I realised this

it's the same thing. This is the problem when you don't understand these things, you think I'm shifting the talking points but you don't realise it's part of the same mechanism.

btw gold is immutable, so irrespective of what happens - nuclear winter, emp blasts, the second coming of our lord and saviours - whatever

it'll still be around, it'll still be valued.

12k years of history is nothing to scoffed at. The US only moved away from this like 70 years ago... but that's another conspiracy for another day.

yeah I know this but the only thing stopping people from switching to another fork or node is what principal exactly? loyalty? cultism?

Already you people are moving from core to knots. 2017 was another whole thing that happened that i'm still catching up on. Sound money on the fragility of the developers is not an investment risk I want to carry tbh.

I honestly see sats as a payment in gold. tokenised digital gold.

bro imagine 😭

yeah, you must consider the cost to extract/process/refine/market aka the total mining difficulty. Yield are around that generally, some years more, some years less.

"give me the actual number"

GPT: "There have been over 100 Bitcoin forks total, but only a handful (under 10) have any real relevance or market activity today. Most are dead or inactive."

what's the difficulty to do the work?

China found deposits too. They even created gold in the Large Hadron collider but that requires immense work.

You see, when we speak about Gold we talk about purity of gold, fine gold. Deposits around the world vary- South Africa has some of the finest gold coming out the ground at 99.98% purity, other places, 10%, 30%, 2% etc. and then on top of that there is the oz/tonne of ore after processing and refining.

It's a hard, cumbersome, capital intensive process.

Also, adding to the Gold supply is not bad at all, it means there is economic growth at a flat 1% or 2% per year if it is the case. More gold to go around means more developments

Gold is scarce. Extraction levels are roughly 1oz per 1ton of ore extracted. That's a LOT of work and cost. That creates a annual yield of around 1 to 2% p.a.

Bitcoin's scarcity was arbitrarily hardcapped by Satoshi at 21 million whole coins, subdivision of 21 quantillian satoshis - enough for everyone in a p2p electronic cash system.

It's a human hard cap and thus can, and has already been, changed in other chains i.e. Litecoin

The math and energy is just the mining difficulty. What, you think excavators come for free? Back to work MyPath you have ore to extract!

Confucius older than Europe itself 😂

Like when he was alive, Europe didn't even exist as a concept and was just prehistoric Bushmen roaming the plains hunting and gathering.

It's actually insane hold old and ancient China is.

nostr:nevent1qqs9kyr5m4fw5jch030xw34rragvktv05en8r6gcmx5wsch42pxlakqpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygq5pzadqjd6hz3ch9mqwkhlusfux5smhmhk9nzvud249x05ju0jegpsgqqqqqqsrut70u

Replying to Avatar 𝕞ptf

The church of Bitcoin

He's not wrong though 😂

Replying to Avatar 𝕞ptf

And yet hashcash was explicitly invented to stop email spam and Satoshi liked that.

Yet here we are.