Bitcoin is the righteous fury of one block after another forever, no matter what.
They actually don't get it.
Not getting bitcoin is 99% of the time because they can't/ don't want to see the problem.
The 1% are the gold bugs, they get the problem but refuse to see the real solution.
The other 99% includes all normies and shitcoiners.
They don't think the money is broke, they're just broke themselves and want more of it.
Why don't they think the money is broken?
Maybe they're just stupid, or busy, or maybe they're morally deficient.
The idea of 21M ONLY is after all just a codification of THOU SHALT NOT STEAL.
This moral principle is why bitcoin exists.
The shitcoiners actually don't understand why bitcoin exists.
How fucking retarded is that? Their scam token is better but somehow they can't even grasp why all this came to exist in the first place.
There's going to be a reckoning and it will be so sweet.
The pathetic attempts to try to make it sound like there was some broader agreement made me 🤮
Seriously watch @jeffbooth keep bringing this crypto degen scammer discussion back to what's important. I love this man.
Crypto is just normies and scammers trying to make it rich.
Bitcoin is ideology. Only 21 million. Ever.
Crypto people just don't get it.
Like I said, normies.
Who wants to hear the, hands down, most retarded explanation for the for year cycle ever uttered? Well, here it is...
First run up - excitement about Bitcoin
Second run up - excitement about Ethereum
Third run up - defi, nfts and stable coins
Not kidding https://youtube.com/clip/Ugkxd3ULcluNW5DIODc63OymYKRYrTw3YCt9
I made a few bets that I won. Not sure if it was with you. I've never made a bearish bet though 😉
Once when Deater got banned from Twitter I set up an account and pretended to be him. It was super easy to just be a cunt and call people bishes until someone spoke to him on telegram and he said it wasn't him 😂😂😂
#[0]
My wife loved that account 🙂
Ah, you're thinking about the comments? I was only considering the feed. Hmm.
I suppose my answer still holds, but within the comments rather than the feed. Not as easy though.
I agree, but does it matter? It still acts as that, but lots of acknowledgements mean that it's of greater interest and will probably be of interest to even more people.
I'm just thinking about the feed and the ability of smaller accounts with quality content to get seen. All a like does here is shows that you have liked it, but doesn't help the content to be seen more.
If the like actually acted like a retweet, then it would allow more people to see the content.
They'd have to make the client combine them though, so you don't end up with lots of the same tweet in your feed. It would just be chronologically in the feed where the latest person liked it. I assume this is possible and its quite transparent as an idea.
Just throwing it out there.
Let me know how you get on 😅
Nah, just throws the note in the feed in the order it was boosted, I think.
My issue is, likes don't do what they did on Twitter. On there it acted like a kind of retweet and that was fine.
When I like something, I'm voting for it, I want more people to see it. Same with a boost. Why do we need both?
With Zaps I was too reward someone.
With quotes I want to let people know what I think about the note via my own feed.
Am I wrong?