Avatar
YunusAtSea⚡️🌊
ce24a8a16368cf09785bc721f2b53cceded479db431d98f2fff58db2bba99d03
Just a pleb on a never ending journey of education and discovery. I love to tinker and try new things. The ocean waves are my second home, this tragically means I keep losing my sats in boating accidents... 🌊🛥🤷🏻‍♂️ GNULinux/FOSS/FOSH enthusiast, BTC maxi, XMR curious, Nostr Maxi.

No, I don't believe that. I am aware of deeper differences, but I don't believe these differences (at least on the macro) have a bearing on the ability to positively contribute towards the progression of the human race. Are you aware that your genetics are different from whoever lives accross the road from you, even if they appear similar to you? Of course... at least I hope so, Humans have been migrating for all of history.

I believe in meritocracy and cooperation. IQ (Even IF the correlation WAS causation in this above infographic, which as I highlighted previously, I don't believe) is not the sole indicator of an individuals ability to positively contribute to humanity.

I could never render an entire group of people as useless due to genetic differences. Nature is not everything, we must also consider nurture and the balance of the two.

Intelligence in itself does not equate good. It was Satans pride in his superiority over man which caused him to fall from heaven, iwhether you're religious or not the wisdom holds true. What you do with intelligence (high or low) and how you benefit your fellow humans defines your moral standing.

Well if you want something clever you should call it Sha, because SHA256 is the Anchor which holds down the Bitcoin network.

As far as I have experienced this has no bearing on an individuals ability to contribute well to society. I can sympathise with the idea that mass migration is not good for a country when it goes to the extremes, but that is mostly due to the clash of culture, not DNA. I grew up in a western mixed race environment and I saw no difference in the performance, potential or ability of any individual based on their "race". I did see a huge difference however coming from their "social status" and how much parents could afford extra tuition. Heck, the picture you posted even mentions in the small print that these results are largely attributed to malnutrition, poverty and lack of possible education. Not to mention that correlation doesn't equal causality.

I think you need to get out of your bubble and experience the real world bro ✌🏼

I pray God show's you the way.

Ok... interesting, how would you back up that idea?

Tell me... do you honestly believe that the colour of someone's skin makes a difference in their ability to contribute to society?

Hey #plebs, listen.

This isn't the first post I've seen goading suspicion. Bare in mind, TPTB never miss an opportunity to stir up paranoia, it puts us in the frame of mind where they need us, contantly wondering if the enemy is behind the corner.

I know the world is a scary place right now and there is definitely some real suspicious stuff going on around the globe but not everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes real big shit happens. Life can be chaotic.

As someone who works on ships and know's the industry very well, this event, despite being tragic, doesn't appear suspicious to me yet. Tragic and ultimately avoidable, yes, but not suspicious. If some evidence to the contrary surfaces I will be willing to change my mind but currently the most likely cause is improper fuel containing too high qauntity of biofuel additive causing the fuel injectors to froth up and choke the engines. This would explain the blackout in both main engine and auxiliary generators. As the industry is being forced to transition to "greener" fuels, issues like this are surfacing. The engines on these older ships generally weren't designed for these newer grades of fuel. This is just a running theory. The reality in these situations is that there is never one single cause but a chain of events that leads up to the failure.

There will be a very thorough investigation and we will know more when the report is released. If there is some conspiracy in all this it will be hard to hide it from the seafaring community, so I will reserve judgment until we know more. ✌🏼

Keep it real, remember occams razor and thanks for reading!

#shipping #plebchain #conspiracytheory

nostr:nevent1qqs0rfw4r5ewu4hc7mspya20l84wmy3gvjhqa2azrgyws7up6shrkmcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzqjrwk6qkjlkeru0d75smzhs9krenexkp5mcv3mrdd4z3ujz7qxfkqvzqqqqqqyvuzwed

"The Ben-e Gessarit sift people to find the humans."

Replying to Avatar jimmysong

# "Free" is Slavery

Thae Young Ho is the highest ranking defector to ever have come out of North Korea. He was an ambassador to Sweden and then to England. At the Oslo Freedom Forum back in 2019, I got to talk to him for a few hours, and it's a conversation I'll never forget.

It's rare that we get such a high ranking official to come out of the country to tell us how they operate, but Mr. Thae is one of those people. He was able to enlighten many of us what North Korea's process for the currency revaluation was and why they backtracked. He also told us about how they had to execute someone so that the regime wouldn't get blamed. If you read any works of Rene Girard, that shouldn't surprise you, especially given that it's an atheist country.

## Kim's Rise to Power

But the story that struck me the most was about Kim Il Sung's rise to power. Mr. Thae explained that after being installed as the hand-picked leader of North Korea in 1945, he wasn't that popular. His Korean was marginal as he had grown up mostly in China. His education was a scant 8 years, all of it in Chinese and communist guerrilla tactics weren't exactly beloved by the people. Yet if we look at how he's looked at in North Korea today, he's essentially viewed as a divinity. Somehow, this poorly educated, barely comprehensible puppet of the Soviet Union became the god of North Korea.

So what happened? How did he gain all that power? What did he do to take control? You would think that given what we're generally told about communism that it would be based completely on fear and ruthlessness that consolidated his power. And certainly, there was plenty of that. But according to Mr. Thae, Kim Il Sung relied on something else: free stuff.

## The Cult of Free

Everyone loves free stuff. Think about how popular the free stuff section on your local craigslist is. I'll bet you anything it's the most visited and monitored part of the site and rarely will you find stuff that's that valuable that someone hasn't taken already. It's part of the human instinct to try to get something for nothing and Kim Il Sung exploited it.

As with most socialist/communist programs, the way he won over the North Korean people was with lots of entitlements. They got free health care, free food, free housing, a guaranteed job. They got everything they needed. And with Soviet subsidization, it worked great. People supported him and for a time, a lot of international observers thought that North Korea was doing better than the South.

But there's a darker side to "free stuff." What happens when they run out of a scarce resource? How do you determine who gets it? Say there's medicine that will help two different people, but there's only enough for one. Who gets it?

In a free market, prices help you decide that, and a high price spurs greater production of the scarce resource so that the prices come down. But if it's free, what do you do? When you have a central controller of everything, the answer is obvious. You reward those that are loyal and punish those that are not. Instead of money being your currency, it was loyalty to the regime that was your currency.

## Markets Build Community

Soon, the only people that really got the free stuff were near the top of the ideological hierarchy. Instead of prices determining what you got, it was your perceived compliance and loyalty to the regime that determined it.

In the absence of a market, compliance was what determined who got what. Mr. Thae's point of the story was that there's something sacred about market transactions. Market transactions cause both parties to have obligations to the other. There's a mutual desire to satisfy the other party and it binds us together in a community. That's precisely what they lacked in North Korea and why the regime was so powerful.

It's easy to listen to these stories and think of it as "out" there, that it's got nothing to do with us. But after listening to this story, I started thinking about what stuff I got for free from centralized entities. I get GMail for free. I get Facebook for free. I get YouTube for free. I realized that the cost of getting these things was indeed compliance. In these walled gardens, they can kick you out at any time and that is indeed what they do. The reason why these companies have so much power is because they give you this stuff in exchange for compliance. They give you this stuff to *enslave* you.

## Western Governments

Fact is, there's way more of the communist/socialist system of free embedded in our supposed democracies than we think. Remember during the pandemic how you had to get a vax to keep your job, visit your sick relatives or travel? There were people in the US suggesting that unvaxxed people should be denied health care services. Such tactics really only work when the service is "free." The central controller of the resource extracts its pound of flesh, just not in money. Many governments have gone down this route. We're much closer to communism in western societies than we'd like to believe.

Prices and paying for things are a good thing. They obligate both parties to the trade to satisfy the other. The instinct to get something for nothing is not one that builds civilization. The reason communism has led to tyranny every single time is because the central government ends up with all the resources and wields absolute power through "free" stuff.

Reject free. Pay for value.

Very interesting, thank you!

Ooff... Always though? 😬 like... in EVERY situation? Might wanna rethink your phrasing there buddy... sounds a bit rapey.