Avatar
Rob Hamilton
cedab81be42ef47dbde653f4ba7ab25ac3aa32cfc2b672ee0f89c0faf882f13e

You can walk the network graph and talk to any node in the p2p network graph with ports open and check to see if they have a tx in their mempool.

Something is telling me you’re playing pedantic word games to avoid the point, which is it’s absolutely possible to show someone a tx which has been filtered, because it would be a transaction not in any block, nor none of the reachable networks mempool.

Here - let me even help you out - you can create a 0 fee tx, and that would be a “filtered” transaction. It takes a few minutes to do it on a core node in the console.

You can create a bitcoin transaction, have it as a txhex, and see if it’s in any mempool via the p2p layer, so it’s the collective of all mempools I am referring to

Very odd to apply a moral lens to an anarchic system, if you wanted an ESG monetary system may I suggest Fiat?

They can just submit the tx to slipstream, the failure rate isn’t there. If you pay the fee, filters don’t work

You could share a txhex - but if it pays a competitive fee, and is consensus compatible, it’ll get included in a block

(Hint, there isn’t one, it’s a rhetorical question)

Does anyone have a link to a bitcoin transaction which has actually been filtered?

I’m at btc++ for the rest of the week, come say hi!

Bitcoin Jawn is a tier 1 bitcoin meetup

in short, removing the limit, leave the config option though if people want it to set up their own node settings