My first paid job had a kid, I reply to a note in the bakery, someone was looling for help to "install internet". I went there, follow the steps from the internet provider, tested, it worked, took maybe 30min. The person hand me over 100 bucks, I said thank you and left.

Once at home my parents were made, like, you didn't ask what change you must return?! I said, what change?

1) Is it to be compatible with the new native connect from CLN called rune?

2) Satscard is the same as boltcard or something else?

- I like your straight ignorance.

I check, he has less than 1 ETH on this address, but it's coming from coinbase so hopefully he was clever enough to dedicate one address to his ENS to not leak how much he has on his main wallet, at least not from the public.

Multi-purpose:

1) Waste 689'000 USD of taxpayers' money

2) Show-off at Chrome & coffee

3) heu... look how nice it is!

Core Lightning users were using c-lightning rest, a rest server made by a third party, same fev as RTL, to connect to all wallets. But this will be deprecated now that Core Lightning directly integrate a connector system called rune, which is much more powerful, allow to set limits and advances rules to increase secruity. RTL was the first to be compatible, following by BTC Pay Server I guess and Zeus will implement this soon as well.

I'm not using BTCPay with the provided lightning instance, so I'm not concerned but I assume you can still add c-lightning rest in the meantime, or just wait for Zeus to implement it, no date thus.

I'm wondering how hard it would be to fork Signal to replace their payment feature by Bitcoin Lightning.

#Signal #Bitcoin

That's sweet. But I would love it. So local bottom should be 2.5x from now after 50% from 5x, right?

Who cares?

Yeah, it's still not here I agree. I would also say that Matrix is morr appropriate for public or semi-public groups like most people use on Telegram.

The article is super interesting and I agree that Telegram is really bad and as I said just a day ago I think, I have no idea why so many Bitcoin groups like meetup still insist on using it.

However, as I understand, the breached data are not coming from Telegram, they are exchanged by individuals within groups on Telegram and due to the poor security of Telegram some people manage to access they groups and the files exchanged on them.

Did I understood this correctly?

I still prefer 2013

I really don't get it why so many Bitcoin groups (like local meetups) are on Telegram. Their are so many better options and these people are used to adopt non-mainstream new technologies anyway.

WTF is this? It's a kind of Reddit on Nostr?

Anyone want to revive the SatoshiCap website? It was so cool to look at all the red during bull markets.

https://satoshicap.net/

If it's easy enough, I will be able to setup account for my family and friends.

Imagine they start their own PeerTube instance? Would be neat!

I think I saw the kids playing with them, among the other colors, red, green, golden... it's the super treasure for them.

Knights and Pirates were mostly from my brother but I took every Lego at my place as I got kids before him 😄.

I let my kids play with it, I'm not so much into collecting Lego. Also I don't look for profit by selling them, I know some white feather from the castle are worth 20-50 bucks maybe and I have a Star Wars set sealed that worth maybe hundred, like 2-3 times the purchase price, but the minifigures looks neat, I keep it to build it with my kids once.

Last week my son made our family out of minifigures, and this is pricless!

Are people that bad educated?

I mean, sending sats to an exchange or "service" for yield, I guess some might still fall for it, but it has nothing to do with recovery phrase ("seed") that's getting compromised.

Proper management of the recovery can be tricky at first and some might make mistakes but depending on their threat model and amount involved, that's might still be good enough. When the threat model change and amount get more significant, people can take new measure to improve their strategy.

I would say that most people have a recovery that have been compromised, it means (for me) that someone else got access to it ans make a copy, waiting for the value to be high enough to stell the sats. Or that a copy would theoritically be accessible by a hacker, virus or malware hidden in another software, which should not be the case for a wallet generated offline (on a temporary OS or hardware wallet).

Passphrase, multiple wallet, multisign, miniscript wallets, can all be options to improve and mitigate various risks, with each their pro and cons.

How can we improve users knowleadge to help them figure out what is best for their situation?