The question is semantically invalid. Logic guaeantees itself since otherwise, it could not exist.
Why not voice it? There's a sense of liberation in knowing there's no plan and that you can make your own.
It's very reasonable from our human perspective but not at all a logical guarantee.
If I were this crazy, I would use termux + neovim
I'll patiently wait for the DVM that uncaps it then
If by dev you mean reviewing PRs, reading/writing docs or chatting with the team, no, you're not crazy.
If you mean editing source code, compiling, running tests, using git and debugging, then yes, you are crazy.
It's not. Polls get no traction even among amethyst users. We need zapless polls yesterday
I can create a virtual world with my own laws on a computer. It could still be meaningless.
Intelligent design does not imply a specific intent.
Even if it did, it is in no way guaranteed that such an intent would be at all related to the cocerns of humans. The same way we breed animals but don't concern ourselves with their morality.
Chaos is just the recognition of our human failure to assimilate enough information. There is no chaos on a fundamental level otherwise there would no consistency.
Just because the fundamental laws are consistent on a physical level, does not mean the Universe has a meaning on a human level.
I disagree. Chaos is just a macro effect. On a fundamental level, there is still order.
I accept that logic if one accepts the axiom that there is an ulterior motive to the universe and our existence.
What you said would not be truth if we happen to live in a chaotic meaningless void.
New #GrapheneOS update adds builtin support for a Duress PIN that makes all data on your device unrecoverable! 👌
https://grapheneos.org/releases#2024053100
Don't forget to donate them, they absolutely deserve it.
Again, I have no idea what you're talking about. Not that it matters, I gave you more than a fair chance to back it up.
Time is too scarce to keep wasting in these unproductive nonsense talks. I enjoyed following you while it lasted, your journaling on your progress with replicatr were interesting reads.
I don't know why you chose to seemingly antagonize me. Bye 🫂
I will zap you 250k sats if you find a note of me attacking you
Why do you think morality is about the why and not the how?
I have no idea what you are talking about. When did I attack you?
The only thing I remeber discussing with you was concurrency, inheritance and compile times.
Human weapons provide an asymmetric advantage towards self defense.
As long as individuals have access to it, aggression is naturally punished since every individual is capable of defending itself.