Always start a new feature branch by always branching off origin/master using `git switch -c feature/branch origin/master` (previous git fetch required obviously).
Then after pushing it remotely, reviewal and approval, you can merge it directly to origin/master or, if your repo policy is avoiding merges, you can push the feature branch directly to origin/master using `git push feature/branch: master`
You don't ever really need to have a 'local master'
#git confession: I work without a local master/main branch
Any clients that do temporary mutes? Muting someone forever is kinda harsh when you just want to do feed curation. And then I just forget I muted them.
Yeah, key derivation is hard. Wallets that went through a lot of whirlpool mixes are very deep in their address derivations which causes most electrum server implementations to be very slow in those cases.
That's why Fulcrum was recomended, or even Samourai built another backend (the dojo) which was just a wrapper sql DB for fast lookups from an xpub.
We can't, the more people that come in, the less intimate it gets.
New version of `rust-ntfy` is out!
https://github.com/shadowylab/ntfy
#rustlang #programming #rust #ntfy
ntfy rocks
Yes I do. There's only notifications for zaps and dms
Doesn't that mean relays would have to index events by xpub and thus they can deanonymize any note author?
The computational load would be crazy. Imagine checking each note to see if the author key *is derived* from one of your follows' xpub...
I thought all dating apps were for virgins. Does not sound very compelling
There's the same stereotype for arch users, hence the meme.
When something is good, the internet will attack through some other angle. Not saying the stereotypes are untrue, but their truthness is besides the point.
Tutanova (email)
VPS servers
Domain names
Monezon (amazon proxy)
silent.link esims
Giftcards
Thereby disrupting "perfect competition", which as I said, is unstable. No disagreement here
Yes but who initially wrote it down. A lot of stuff seems obvious in hindsight but it took a bright might to notice it and formalize it.
I remember reading somewhere that perfect competition under a free market was not really stable nor desirable.
This is because it causes profit margins to tend to 0 which has 2 negative effects:
* makes companies more fragile to externalities
* does not allow companies to accumulate treasuries that enable them to do research, innovate, take risks, etc
The end result is a stale stagnated balkanized economy. The corollary is that some market imbalances and assymetries are healthy.
Anyone knows where this reasoning comes from? Did I dream it up?
You're not supposed to read pseudo-intelectual maxi BS just to feel better. It's a tool. If you find it useful, use it, if you don't, move on. That's all there is to it.
So you decided to str the pot
I was just sharing my real world PoV. GPL code is untouchable since it forces a major change whereas MIT gives you the freedom to grow and contribute back.
Sure, there will always be assholes. But no software license fixdd that.