Und entscheidet euch endlich mal ob die Linken jetzt "cant meme" oder Propaganda gut können. Da scheint es im deutschen AnCap Lager ständig Widersprüche zu geben.
Der hat mehr Erfahrung mit der Polizei und wie man sich gegen Staatsgewalt behauptet als Du.
This is not a delayed april fools?
Ihr macht ne Social Media Engagement-Aktion für ne Parteiveranstaltung, quatsch dir den Scheiss doch nicht schön. Wenn morgen "viele Plebs" bei ner anderen Partei aktiv sind, stellst du dann dafür auch die Reichweite des Vereinspodcasts zur Verfügung? Ab wieviele Plebs gilt das? https://youtu.be/TRGIQAUHqhM
Episode 277 - Blockzeit 889868 - von und mit nostr:nprofile1qqsx8y4dj9mzt99r9yvd3jklt9s37mta0lhq3rq0mvn3lk2f8szr9vcprfmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68yurvv438xtnrdakszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9ehx7um5wf3ksetrdvhx6egpz4mhxue69uhks6tnwshxummnw3ezumrpdejqu63czl, nostr:nprofile1qqs0ys979d5ylpwvs9tx7gyp8p40s8t5yl4gvfgv300xk759qrrkrwspremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59uq3samnwvaz7tmswfjk66t4d5h8qunfd4skctnwv46qzxnhwden5te0wpuhyctdd9jzuenfv96x5ctx9e3k7mf0e40a3h und nostr:nprofile1qqsx2l58fx0qyec4lqfgvqcypzkqxgq5atuuxs4vtyqhk3rj7qf6g0ccjnmh0
- Erster Public Pool Block - 888989
- NerdNOS Workshop Trier
- SPD will Jahresfrist auf Bitcoin Gewinne abschaffen
- Braiins BCB100 Control Board
- Robosats v0.7.5
- Mempal Android App
- Einundzwanzig Vereins Projekte
Als (laut Satzung) politisch unabhängiger Verein ein Afura Fest supporten welches von einer Partei organisiert wird ist schon grenzwertig. Gewinne ich jetzt die Schallplatte? 
OK I consulted my LLM on that definition. It says to me if its as "public upfront design decision" in a software it is not a backdoor by definition. But I can see your case here. If you come from classic ecash it might feel like a backdoor because its privacy is weakend on one side by design. If you come from PayPal, Visa or SEPA system it still feels like a big privacy improvement .. and would be so much better what mainstream uses right now.
Describe a fashist turned world where GNUTaler would nit work for you? You have perfect sender privacy - your OK. If you wanna support the resistance you trust them anyway and can just give them your tokens (double spend is not relevant here) and now the resistance can spend with perfect sender privacy. So where would be the problem?
Its different from Bitcoin, sure. But in a normal western world where every commercial merchant needs to disclose received payment thru detailed booking to the government anyways its a common model they replicate - tranparency on the merchant side (receiver) and perfect privacy the customer side (sender) is a valid compromise for an commercial payment system. As long as Bitcoin for private to private payments is not illegal on the side .. I have no problem with that.
The "backdoor" is that the receiver has no privacy or has to trust the sender. But thats by public design .. its a public announced feature of the software. Thats not a secret backdoor .. a public front door for the government at best.
And thats OK is people choose that by choice. GNU Taler promises eCash sender privacy .. that is even better compared to Bitcoin onchain (leaving an pseudonym public trace). But is transparent to the givernment on the trustless receiver side. That is still better then any digital payment like Visa, PayPal and a like.
Oh yeah .. they would love the government (or the private cabal of oligarch banks) running their ecash mint. Its open-source and the clients the people using will also be .. so either we can describe the attack how the will backdoor it or we shut up.
Like with Bitcoin, the devs could be the worst opiniated people, the idea is that I dont have to trust them - show me the code/attack or shut up.
What would be worth a theoretical discussion: If they get picked (not likely) as CBDC infratructure, how would they run the backdoor without anybody knowing? What could they do to the server the ECB is running, that would compromise the privacy of a payment?
So far in this thread the talk was about one developers opinion. If there is a backdoor implemented or a general push for it please share the information. Otherwise its gossip.
Can we at least agree that this was the akward opinion of ONE developer of that project and not quickly jump to "they"? I mean you also dont want to play pars pro toto with Bitcoin devs right?
And sorry .. it should be every 21 years, not every 25 years of cause.
All it would require is to move coins once every generation (to a new address) to protect them from redistribution thru mining. I think thats a fair deal if communicated early.
ReDistrubute all coins that were not moved since 25 years would be a way to have tail emissions while keeping the 21M limit .. while you make sure lost coins get reused and old addresses get updated (reducing technical debt and level up security).
