Ah, so I'm aparat...lame. He sucks
It's a trio? Fml
I guess npub can be guy on left π€
I have no idea which one does what. Just gave myself who I think is the bigger contributor of the duo, so that it'd make more sense
"Slightly imperfect" I think they would call it in fine print
I had this one pale blue shirt with a random canoe silhouette print that I loved, but the seam around the bottom was somehow off so that it had a permanent kink you couldn't iron out π₯²
Ladies and gentlemen we got the swooshing effect! nostr:npub1s3grn8hq3zhfuedrm4c9z2ljukp36x0lsakhwgqqavl2nsk0q0lqpv2tvy you seeing this
My coaching is clearly helping. We make good music together π€
I went there a couple times as a kid, ngl. But results were mixed and I wouldn't be caught dead there today π
Oh yeah, we slappin' the bass good on this one. The ride serves as good swooshing type effect here in the middle, big ups. Crisp hi hat work doing it for me at 2:30. This is flowing well, groovin.
Still listening but sending reply
Came up in convo with someone other day. Was huge I think
This media campaign from back in day...
Speaking of ear bleeds, I just learned that the old guy who got pushed down in some riots a couple or more years ago, who had blood coming out of his ear etc., was grifting the whole thing and set it up to get famous/paid.
Why am I just now hearing this?!
4 seconds in and my ears are bleeding! Great content
I put yellow letter in same place twice
I prefer that explanation over the truth, just a bonehead
Not so much logical as aesthetic or in spirit of game, but agree
I pulled an npub ( nostr:npub1s3grn8hq3zhfuedrm4c9z2ljukp36x0lsakhwgqqavl2nsk0q0lqpv2tvy ) on my second guess, but wasn't gonna admit it
I'm going with it for similar intuition
Oh right! I've still been guessing plurals now and then. Don't think I'd picked up on that informal rule. And yeah, it's never those longshot guess-words that go through
Me too! I almost never scroll the Notes only tab. Think we're in the minority
Replies too? If so, my apologies
Damn! I was close too
#Wordle 1,523 6/6
β¬β¬β¬π¨β¬
β¬β¬π¨π¨β¬
π¨π¨β¬β¬β¬
β¬π©π©π©β¬
β¬π©π©π©β¬
π©π©π©π©π©
nostr:npub132ny9cnwv5rjzw0ppk6ev34gn2n48zjejed2k0kcjxgawxt86mps7f9u95 calling in the big guns
Not bad. I've played with AI for math stuff before and it does ok. Been a few months since I have, so maybe it's gotten better, but early experience was that it quickly gets lost if you go too deep; mine started spewing incoherent sounds a few times lol
Not bad, though a bit verbose. I think the question may be a bit off for getting the best response. One of the more important properties, and what distinguishes them from the rationals the most, is the properties of them as a linear order (every bounded subset contains a least upper bound inside the real set itself). And I think something like containing a dense countable subset (the rationals) yields their unique/categorical property. This is mentioned in the book, as you know.
So you have these desirable properties your intuition wants them to have, and are able to prove that the description given uniquely captures it. So if two people were to discuss them, you can be sure that their conceptions are identical. There's a little nuance im hesitant to even mention, but I will, and that's that these canonical model proofs rely on second order logic. Which is fine, but when you get to completeness theorem it might confuse a bit since there you are restricting to first order logic.
Ah, I see. Of course
Haha, assumed you weren't a gamer, which made the rec extra enticing. Will let you know how/if it goes
Now to hold off starting until I have a day to burn. Shouldn't be long, but must resist a couple more days π
I may be missing a reference here. Have sinking suspicion something is going over my head π€
Just seeing this lol. That's an excellent idea. Came to me for similar reasons this morning
Nostr vpn sounds smart, but I'm too ignorant of how things work to know for sure.
Thanks for splainin
YouTube is up to all sort of fucktardery, I was watching this the other day about them automatically adding AI touchups to shorts:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86nhP8tvbLY
I don't use Audible nor do I have an account with them, so that was particularly noticeable. I simply followed a .com link somebody posted here and it redirected me to the .co.uk site despite me being VPN'd to Belgium at the time.
I suspect they are using cookies or Mac addresses or injection testing to identify your real location. These are relatively complex things to do, but if you are incentivised to do it, very possible.
Bastards!
Is at least the promise (I think it's the case anyway) that using a vpn encrypts your traffic? π₯²
I googled each just as a test and showed someone just now. They guessed food both times and were wrong. Too nasty to post
I trust you know what you're talking about, but for YouTube specifically I've noticed changed functionality with in US vs out, using vpn. It's hard to recreate exactly each time, as there's also some interplay with being signed in possibly that I'm foggy on, but pretty sure PiP on free accounts doesn't work for me outside US but does inside (vpn used each way).
Is audible, in ur opinion, using knowledge of your account, or somehow defeating the vpn?
I definitely don't trust the one I use, and have been meaning to up my game